Loading…

Response of wheat to the geometry and proximity of lime slotting in an acidic soil profile

Lime slotting is a strategy for the amelioration of acidic soil profiles, whereby vertical seams of lime-amended soil traverse the acidic horizon. Two experiments characterized the above-ground and below-ground response of wheat to the lime amendment of 4 cm or 8 cm wide slots traversing the 7–40 cm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil & tillage research 2022-03, Vol.217, p.105269, Article 105269
Main Authors: Damon, Paul M., Azam, Gaus, Gazey, Chris, Scanlan, Craig A., Rengel, Zed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105269
container_title Soil & tillage research
container_volume 217
creator Damon, Paul M.
Azam, Gaus
Gazey, Chris
Scanlan, Craig A.
Rengel, Zed
description Lime slotting is a strategy for the amelioration of acidic soil profiles, whereby vertical seams of lime-amended soil traverse the acidic horizon. Two experiments characterized the above-ground and below-ground response of wheat to the lime amendment of 4 cm or 8 cm wide slots traversing the 7–40 cm deep acidic (pH = 3.9), Al-toxic subsoil horizon in an 80 cm deep constructed acidic soil profile. The growth of wheat rows responded to the proximity, but not the width of the limed slots. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to limed slots had greater shoot growth than those in the non-amended soil profile, whereas rows positioned 4 cm or more away from a limed slot were not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile, regardless of the width of the 4 cm or 8 cm wide limed slots. Growth responses to the limed slots were realized at the early stages of plant growth and sustained until anthesis: rows positioned above the limed slots had 83% more tillers at 28 days after sowing, 58% greater green canopy area 35 days after sowing and 13% more spikelets per ear at anthesis compared to those in the non-amended profile. A rubidium tracer within the limed slots revealed that the proximity of wheat rows to the limed slots strongly influenced the timing at which the wheat roots exploited them. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to a limed slot accumulated the rubidium tracer within 21 days after sowing, whereas wheat rows positioned 4, 9 or 11 cm away from the limed slot did not access it until 35, 42 or 49 days after sowing, respectively. The uptake of a rubidium tracer from acidic or lime amended soil sections was strongly correlated with the length of roots within the respective soil sections. The limed slots traversing the acidic subsoil horizon functioned in two ways. Firstly, as discrete sanctuaries for root proliferation within the acidic layer, root length density was 3–7-fold greater than in non-amended soil sections, primarily due to the proliferation of fine (≤ 2 mm diameter) roots that were inhibited in the acidic soil sections. Greater root proliferation within the limed slots enabled greater uptake of nutrients and, to a lesser extent, water from the 7–40 cm deep acidic subsoil horizon. Secondly, the limed slots acted as conduits for roots to traverse the acidic, Al-toxic horizon. Uptake of water and a strontium tracer from the 40–80 cm deep subsoil horizon (beneath the 7–40 cm deep acidic layer) dem
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.still.2021.105269
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_still_2021_105269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167198721003421</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0167198721003421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMoWKu_wEv-wNZ87GY3Bw9S_IKCIHrxErLZSTtluylJUPvv3bWePQ0M7w3DI-SaswVnXN1sFylj3y8EE3zcVELpEzLjTa0LWZblKZmNVF1w3dTn5CKlLWOslKKZkY9XSPswJKDB068N2ExzoHkDdA1hBzkeqB06uo_hG3eYDxPW4w5o6kPOOKwpDiNBrcMOHU0B-wn22MMlOfO2T3D1N-fk_eH-bflUrF4en5d3q8JJJnPRKdcKr7zVDTS-bbUuRVdLKRUrXdP6igvFGHhQCqyW3lnVWA1V3QmtKhByTuTxroshpQje7CPubDwYzsyUx2zNbx4z5THHPKN1e7RgfO0TIZrkEAYHHUZw2XQB__V_AOidcK8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of wheat to the geometry and proximity of lime slotting in an acidic soil profile</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Damon, Paul M. ; Azam, Gaus ; Gazey, Chris ; Scanlan, Craig A. ; Rengel, Zed</creator><creatorcontrib>Damon, Paul M. ; Azam, Gaus ; Gazey, Chris ; Scanlan, Craig A. ; Rengel, Zed</creatorcontrib><description>Lime slotting is a strategy for the amelioration of acidic soil profiles, whereby vertical seams of lime-amended soil traverse the acidic horizon. Two experiments characterized the above-ground and below-ground response of wheat to the lime amendment of 4 cm or 8 cm wide slots traversing the 7–40 cm deep acidic (pH = 3.9), Al-toxic subsoil horizon in an 80 cm deep constructed acidic soil profile. The growth of wheat rows responded to the proximity, but not the width of the limed slots. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to limed slots had greater shoot growth than those in the non-amended soil profile, whereas rows positioned 4 cm or more away from a limed slot were not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile, regardless of the width of the 4 cm or 8 cm wide limed slots. Growth responses to the limed slots were realized at the early stages of plant growth and sustained until anthesis: rows positioned above the limed slots had 83% more tillers at 28 days after sowing, 58% greater green canopy area 35 days after sowing and 13% more spikelets per ear at anthesis compared to those in the non-amended profile. A rubidium tracer within the limed slots revealed that the proximity of wheat rows to the limed slots strongly influenced the timing at which the wheat roots exploited them. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to a limed slot accumulated the rubidium tracer within 21 days after sowing, whereas wheat rows positioned 4, 9 or 11 cm away from the limed slot did not access it until 35, 42 or 49 days after sowing, respectively. The uptake of a rubidium tracer from acidic or lime amended soil sections was strongly correlated with the length of roots within the respective soil sections. The limed slots traversing the acidic subsoil horizon functioned in two ways. Firstly, as discrete sanctuaries for root proliferation within the acidic layer, root length density was 3–7-fold greater than in non-amended soil sections, primarily due to the proliferation of fine (≤ 2 mm diameter) roots that were inhibited in the acidic soil sections. Greater root proliferation within the limed slots enabled greater uptake of nutrients and, to a lesser extent, water from the 7–40 cm deep acidic subsoil horizon. Secondly, the limed slots acted as conduits for roots to traverse the acidic, Al-toxic horizon. Uptake of water and a strontium tracer from the 40–80 cm deep subsoil horizon (beneath the 7–40 cm deep acidic layer) demonstrated that the limed slots enabled plant rows positioned above them to acquire water and nutrients from the 40–80 cm deep horizon 1–2 weeks earlier and in greater quantities than in the non-amended profile. However, for plant rows positioned 4 cm or more away from the limed slots, root activity in the 40–80 cm deep horizon was not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile. Therefore, responses to lime slotting amendments are likely to be greatest where limed slots are positioned beneath wheat rows, and least where they are positioned in the interrow. •Lime slotting in an acidic soil profile increased wheat growth.•Wheat growth responded to the proximity, but not the width of limed slots.•Proximity to a limed slot influenced the timing at which roots intercepted it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-1987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Contest competition ; Deep tillage ; Heterogeneous ; Liming</subject><ispartof>Soil &amp; tillage research, 2022-03, Vol.217, p.105269, Article 105269</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Damon, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azam, Gaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazey, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rengel, Zed</creatorcontrib><title>Response of wheat to the geometry and proximity of lime slotting in an acidic soil profile</title><title>Soil &amp; tillage research</title><description>Lime slotting is a strategy for the amelioration of acidic soil profiles, whereby vertical seams of lime-amended soil traverse the acidic horizon. Two experiments characterized the above-ground and below-ground response of wheat to the lime amendment of 4 cm or 8 cm wide slots traversing the 7–40 cm deep acidic (pH = 3.9), Al-toxic subsoil horizon in an 80 cm deep constructed acidic soil profile. The growth of wheat rows responded to the proximity, but not the width of the limed slots. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to limed slots had greater shoot growth than those in the non-amended soil profile, whereas rows positioned 4 cm or more away from a limed slot were not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile, regardless of the width of the 4 cm or 8 cm wide limed slots. Growth responses to the limed slots were realized at the early stages of plant growth and sustained until anthesis: rows positioned above the limed slots had 83% more tillers at 28 days after sowing, 58% greater green canopy area 35 days after sowing and 13% more spikelets per ear at anthesis compared to those in the non-amended profile. A rubidium tracer within the limed slots revealed that the proximity of wheat rows to the limed slots strongly influenced the timing at which the wheat roots exploited them. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to a limed slot accumulated the rubidium tracer within 21 days after sowing, whereas wheat rows positioned 4, 9 or 11 cm away from the limed slot did not access it until 35, 42 or 49 days after sowing, respectively. The uptake of a rubidium tracer from acidic or lime amended soil sections was strongly correlated with the length of roots within the respective soil sections. The limed slots traversing the acidic subsoil horizon functioned in two ways. Firstly, as discrete sanctuaries for root proliferation within the acidic layer, root length density was 3–7-fold greater than in non-amended soil sections, primarily due to the proliferation of fine (≤ 2 mm diameter) roots that were inhibited in the acidic soil sections. Greater root proliferation within the limed slots enabled greater uptake of nutrients and, to a lesser extent, water from the 7–40 cm deep acidic subsoil horizon. Secondly, the limed slots acted as conduits for roots to traverse the acidic, Al-toxic horizon. Uptake of water and a strontium tracer from the 40–80 cm deep subsoil horizon (beneath the 7–40 cm deep acidic layer) demonstrated that the limed slots enabled plant rows positioned above them to acquire water and nutrients from the 40–80 cm deep horizon 1–2 weeks earlier and in greater quantities than in the non-amended profile. However, for plant rows positioned 4 cm or more away from the limed slots, root activity in the 40–80 cm deep horizon was not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile. Therefore, responses to lime slotting amendments are likely to be greatest where limed slots are positioned beneath wheat rows, and least where they are positioned in the interrow. •Lime slotting in an acidic soil profile increased wheat growth.•Wheat growth responded to the proximity, but not the width of limed slots.•Proximity to a limed slot influenced the timing at which roots intercepted it.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Contest competition</subject><subject>Deep tillage</subject><subject>Heterogeneous</subject><subject>Liming</subject><issn>0167-1987</issn><issn>1879-3444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMoWKu_wEv-wNZ87GY3Bw9S_IKCIHrxErLZSTtluylJUPvv3bWePQ0M7w3DI-SaswVnXN1sFylj3y8EE3zcVELpEzLjTa0LWZblKZmNVF1w3dTn5CKlLWOslKKZkY9XSPswJKDB068N2ExzoHkDdA1hBzkeqB06uo_hG3eYDxPW4w5o6kPOOKwpDiNBrcMOHU0B-wn22MMlOfO2T3D1N-fk_eH-bflUrF4en5d3q8JJJnPRKdcKr7zVDTS-bbUuRVdLKRUrXdP6igvFGHhQCqyW3lnVWA1V3QmtKhByTuTxroshpQje7CPubDwYzsyUx2zNbx4z5THHPKN1e7RgfO0TIZrkEAYHHUZw2XQB__V_AOidcK8</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Damon, Paul M.</creator><creator>Azam, Gaus</creator><creator>Gazey, Chris</creator><creator>Scanlan, Craig A.</creator><creator>Rengel, Zed</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Response of wheat to the geometry and proximity of lime slotting in an acidic soil profile</title><author>Damon, Paul M. ; Azam, Gaus ; Gazey, Chris ; Scanlan, Craig A. ; Rengel, Zed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Contest competition</topic><topic>Deep tillage</topic><topic>Heterogeneous</topic><topic>Liming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Damon, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azam, Gaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazey, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rengel, Zed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Soil &amp; tillage research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Damon, Paul M.</au><au>Azam, Gaus</au><au>Gazey, Chris</au><au>Scanlan, Craig A.</au><au>Rengel, Zed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of wheat to the geometry and proximity of lime slotting in an acidic soil profile</atitle><jtitle>Soil &amp; tillage research</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>217</volume><spage>105269</spage><pages>105269-</pages><artnum>105269</artnum><issn>0167-1987</issn><eissn>1879-3444</eissn><abstract>Lime slotting is a strategy for the amelioration of acidic soil profiles, whereby vertical seams of lime-amended soil traverse the acidic horizon. Two experiments characterized the above-ground and below-ground response of wheat to the lime amendment of 4 cm or 8 cm wide slots traversing the 7–40 cm deep acidic (pH = 3.9), Al-toxic subsoil horizon in an 80 cm deep constructed acidic soil profile. The growth of wheat rows responded to the proximity, but not the width of the limed slots. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to limed slots had greater shoot growth than those in the non-amended soil profile, whereas rows positioned 4 cm or more away from a limed slot were not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile, regardless of the width of the 4 cm or 8 cm wide limed slots. Growth responses to the limed slots were realized at the early stages of plant growth and sustained until anthesis: rows positioned above the limed slots had 83% more tillers at 28 days after sowing, 58% greater green canopy area 35 days after sowing and 13% more spikelets per ear at anthesis compared to those in the non-amended profile. A rubidium tracer within the limed slots revealed that the proximity of wheat rows to the limed slots strongly influenced the timing at which the wheat roots exploited them. Wheat rows positioned above or adjacent (0–4 cm) to a limed slot accumulated the rubidium tracer within 21 days after sowing, whereas wheat rows positioned 4, 9 or 11 cm away from the limed slot did not access it until 35, 42 or 49 days after sowing, respectively. The uptake of a rubidium tracer from acidic or lime amended soil sections was strongly correlated with the length of roots within the respective soil sections. The limed slots traversing the acidic subsoil horizon functioned in two ways. Firstly, as discrete sanctuaries for root proliferation within the acidic layer, root length density was 3–7-fold greater than in non-amended soil sections, primarily due to the proliferation of fine (≤ 2 mm diameter) roots that were inhibited in the acidic soil sections. Greater root proliferation within the limed slots enabled greater uptake of nutrients and, to a lesser extent, water from the 7–40 cm deep acidic subsoil horizon. Secondly, the limed slots acted as conduits for roots to traverse the acidic, Al-toxic horizon. Uptake of water and a strontium tracer from the 40–80 cm deep subsoil horizon (beneath the 7–40 cm deep acidic layer) demonstrated that the limed slots enabled plant rows positioned above them to acquire water and nutrients from the 40–80 cm deep horizon 1–2 weeks earlier and in greater quantities than in the non-amended profile. However, for plant rows positioned 4 cm or more away from the limed slots, root activity in the 40–80 cm deep horizon was not significantly different (at α = 0.05) to those in the non-amended profile. Therefore, responses to lime slotting amendments are likely to be greatest where limed slots are positioned beneath wheat rows, and least where they are positioned in the interrow. •Lime slotting in an acidic soil profile increased wheat growth.•Wheat growth responded to the proximity, but not the width of limed slots.•Proximity to a limed slot influenced the timing at which roots intercepted it.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.still.2021.105269</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-1987
ispartof Soil & tillage research, 2022-03, Vol.217, p.105269, Article 105269
issn 0167-1987
1879-3444
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_still_2021_105269
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Acidity
Contest competition
Deep tillage
Heterogeneous
Liming
title Response of wheat to the geometry and proximity of lime slotting in an acidic soil profile
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A42%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20wheat%20to%20the%20geometry%20and%20proximity%20of%20lime%20slotting%20in%20an%20acidic%20soil%20profile&rft.jtitle=Soil%20&%20tillage%20research&rft.au=Damon,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=217&rft.spage=105269&rft.pages=105269-&rft.artnum=105269&rft.issn=0167-1987&rft.eissn=1879-3444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.still.2021.105269&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0167198721003421%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d6cb2f6fa98e8fbb9942d7333604c8bf512600efe66ea93fca68a9e57d2965e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true