Loading…

An analysis of program evaluation course content in CSHSE–accredited human services baccalaureate programs

•Professional evaluation competencies are well-aligned with undergraduate programs.•Human Services programs have higher program evaluation credit hour requirements.•Some gaps exist between evaluation course content and professional competencies. This study examines evaluation course content for unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Studies in educational evaluation 2018-12, Vol.59, p.187-194
Main Author: Thomas, Najmah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Professional evaluation competencies are well-aligned with undergraduate programs.•Human Services programs have higher program evaluation credit hour requirements.•Some gaps exist between evaluation course content and professional competencies. This study examines evaluation course content for undergraduate Human Services programs. Evaluation is not generally considered to be an undergraduate topic, and as a result, there is limited understanding of evaluation course content for undergraduate programs. The increased focus on evaluation in the human service field warrants a targeted review of the preparation and training provided to potential members of the profession, particularly at the baccalaureate degree level. This research examines syllabi for program evaluation courses in baccalaureate level Human Services Programs accredited by the Council for Standards in Human Services Education (CSHSE) to determine whether there is alignment between professional evaluation competencies and human services program evaluation course content. Content analysis of program evaluation course syllabi and cross-case analysis reveals how Human Services program evaluation course content compares with Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE)-based standards for professional program evaluators. Implications for education, practice and future research are discussed.
ISSN:0191-491X
1879-2529
DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.08.001