Loading…

Extraction of antioxidants from winery wastes using subcritical water

[Display omitted] ► Subcritical water extraction of phenolic compounds from grape pomace was performed. ► The effects of pressure and temperature on phenolics extraction were evaluated. ► Higher contents of polyphenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity were achieved. ► Subcritical water extractio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of supercritical fluids 2012-05, Vol.65, p.18-24
Main Authors: Aliakbarian, Bahar, Fathi, Ali, Perego, Patrizia, Dehghani, Fariba
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] ► Subcritical water extraction of phenolic compounds from grape pomace was performed. ► The effects of pressure and temperature on phenolics extraction were evaluated. ► Higher contents of polyphenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity were achieved. ► Subcritical water extraction was more efficient than conventional aqueous system. Subcritical water extraction of phenolic compounds from grape pomace was performed. The combined effects of extraction temperature (100, 120 and 140°C) and pressure (8MPa, 11.5MPa and 15MPa) were investigated using a 32 full factorial design and response surface methodology. Extractions with significantly higher polyphenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity were achieved when using subcritical water extraction compared to conventional methods. The optimum extraction conditions and the desirability of model were at 140°C and 11.6MPa (0.9550). At this operating condition, 31.69mgGAE/gDP and 15.28mgCE/gDP of total polyphenols and flavonoids were recovered, respectively. The extracts showed antiradical power of 13.40μgDPPH/μlextract. Subcritical water extraction was more efficient than using water and ethanol at atmospheric pressure for the extraction of these compounds.
ISSN:0896-8446
1872-8162
DOI:10.1016/j.supflu.2012.02.022