Response to V. A. Marichev's reply [Surf. Sci. 605(2011)2097] to the comments written by E. M. Gutman [Surf. Sci. 605(2011)1923]

For the first time, it is shown that the first and second Gokhshtein equations were originally derived by him from false fundamental equations violating criteria for applications of Maxwell relations and Legendre transforms. These equations are erroneous. For example, the direct connection between t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surface science 2012-04, Vol.606 (7-8), p.772-775
Main Author: Gutman, Emmanuel M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Condensed matter: electronic structure, electrical, magnetic, and optical properties
Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties
Cross-disciplinary physics: materials science
rheology
Exact sciences and technology
Physics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:For the first time, it is shown that the first and second Gokhshtein equations were originally derived by him from false fundamental equations violating criteria for applications of Maxwell relations and Legendre transforms. These equations are erroneous. For example, the direct connection between the electrode potential and charge density is actually independent of the tangential elastic strain of flat ideally polarizable electrode. The sequence of equations of Shuttleworth–Herring–Eriksson–Couchman–Jesser–Everet–Davidson–Rusanov has a common mathematical defect which consists of illegally equating the total differential to the partial differential.
ISSN:0039-6028
1879-2758
DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2011.11.036