Loading…

Searching for quality: Examining Pinterest as a resource for teachers of science

Teachers use Pinterest for instructional ideas and lessons, yet little is known about the quality of the curriculum resources teachers access on Pinterest. This study analyzed 1588 Pinterest pins related to adaptations and forces and their linked websites for characteristics about the pins, websites...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Teaching and teacher education 2023-10, Vol.132, p.104207, Article 104207
Main Authors: Navy, Shannon L., Nixon, Ryan S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Teachers use Pinterest for instructional ideas and lessons, yet little is known about the quality of the curriculum resources teachers access on Pinterest. This study analyzed 1588 Pinterest pins related to adaptations and forces and their linked websites for characteristics about the pins, websites, and the website authors. It was found that the pins and websites contained few inaccuracies, but also little science content. Websites portrayed instruction that was incoherent, that focused on low-level memorization, and that lacked science investigations. Authors of pinned websites were often individuals, few of whom claimed expertise in either education or science. Higher quality websites did not contain science inaccuracies and were created by authors affiliated with professional organizations who claimed science expertise. Implications are for science teachers, science teacher educators, professional organizations, and the Pinterest community. •This study analyzed 1,588 science Pinterest pins and their linked websites.•Pins and websites contained few inaccuracies, but also contained little science content.•Websites portrayed instruction that was not connected and focused on low level memorization.•Authors of pinned websites were individuals who rarely claimed science or education expertise.•Higher quality websites were linked to accurate pins and created by authors who claimed expertise.
ISSN:0742-051X
1879-2480
DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104207