Loading…

The relationship between people's activities and values with the protection level and biodiversity

We investigated how people's recreational activities, values, and land use preferences are related to the protection level, biodiversity and cultural heritage values of nature-based tourism areas in northern Finland. We assessed peoples' opinions using a public participation geographic inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tourism management (1982) 2020-12, Vol.81, p.104141, Article 104141
Main Authors: Tolvanen, Anne, Kangas, Katja, Tarvainen, Oili, Huhta, Esa, Jäkäläniemi, Anne, Kyttä, Marketta, Nikula, Ari, Nivala, Vesa, Tuulentie, Seija, Tyrväinen, Liisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We investigated how people's recreational activities, values, and land use preferences are related to the protection level, biodiversity and cultural heritage values of nature-based tourism areas in northern Finland. We assessed peoples' opinions using a public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) and analyzed the data together with spatial biodiversity and cultural heritage data from the same area. Associations between the PPGIS place markings with the protection level and biodiversity values were quite low, and for the cultural heritage sites they were altogether missing. Negative preferences were often marked in areas with high numbers of sites rated as pleasant and they overlapped with each other, indicating conflicting preferences. Since most activities are not noticeably related to the protection level or biodiversity values of a site they can be planned so as to protect the biodiversity of the area. •We merged PPGIS data with spatial biodiversity and cultural heritage data in a nature-based tourism area.•Associations between PPGIS markings with protection level and biodiversity were low and for cultural heritage missing.•Negative preferences towards tourism, protection and forestry often overlapped, indicating conflicting preferences.•Since most activities were not related to protection level or biodiversity they can be placed to protect biodiversity.•Differences between opinions among respondents can be used to manage the area to fulfil the needs of various users.
ISSN:0261-5177
1879-3193
DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104141