Loading…

Optimal compliance choices for ocean carriers under the sulphur regulation

This paper investigates how carriers adapt to the sulphur regulation by choosing between sulphur scrubber (SS) and fuel switching (FS). A cost minimization model is proposed to determine the optimal compliance choices, considering factors such as fuel prices, capital cost difference between SS and F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment Transport and environment, 2023-03, Vol.116, p.103639, Article 103639
Main Authors: Sheng, Dian, Jiang, Jiehui, Wang, Hua, Tan, Zhijia, Wang, Yadong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103639
container_title Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment
container_volume 116
creator Sheng, Dian
Jiang, Jiehui
Wang, Hua
Tan, Zhijia
Wang, Yadong
description This paper investigates how carriers adapt to the sulphur regulation by choosing between sulphur scrubber (SS) and fuel switching (FS). A cost minimization model is proposed to determine the optimal compliance choices, considering factors such as fuel prices, capital cost difference between SS and FS, and shipping service profile. We find that the optimal choice depends on the tradeoff between the capital cost advantage of FS and the fuel cost advantage of SS. And such a tradeoff is moderated by the vessel’s annual fuel consumption. Ignoring the speed differentiation behavior of FS vessels would exaggerate the benefits of SS. But whether it can cause a wrong compliance choice depends on the extent of overestimation, which depends on the presence in emission control areas and fuel prices. When fuel price volatility is factored in, a portfolio of FS and SS might be better than simply choosing either one for all vessels.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103639
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trd_2023_103639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1361920923000366</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1361920923000366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHa-QMLYjp1ErFAFFFSpG1hbjjOhrtI4shMkbo-rsGY1fxZvNP8Rcs8gZ8DUwzGfQptz4CLtQon6gqxYVdYZFwVcpiwUy2oO9TW5ifEIAFJKtSLv-3FyJ9NT609j78xgkdqDdxYj7Xyg3qIZqDUhOAyRzkOLgU4HpHHux8McaMCvuTeT88MtuepMH_Hub67J58vzx2ab7favb5unXWaFgCnrQCJT2JQpAArkpVQKVcGxkcwYgVXVFGXDjQBZ2aJFI-tKVpASF3VbiDVhy10bfIwBOz2GVCH8aAb6LEMfdZKhzzL0IiMxjwuD6bHvVEVH6zCVbV1AO-nWu3_oXzYIaB4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal compliance choices for ocean carriers under the sulphur regulation</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Sheng, Dian ; Jiang, Jiehui ; Wang, Hua ; Tan, Zhijia ; Wang, Yadong</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Dian ; Jiang, Jiehui ; Wang, Hua ; Tan, Zhijia ; Wang, Yadong</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates how carriers adapt to the sulphur regulation by choosing between sulphur scrubber (SS) and fuel switching (FS). A cost minimization model is proposed to determine the optimal compliance choices, considering factors such as fuel prices, capital cost difference between SS and FS, and shipping service profile. We find that the optimal choice depends on the tradeoff between the capital cost advantage of FS and the fuel cost advantage of SS. And such a tradeoff is moderated by the vessel’s annual fuel consumption. Ignoring the speed differentiation behavior of FS vessels would exaggerate the benefits of SS. But whether it can cause a wrong compliance choice depends on the extent of overestimation, which depends on the presence in emission control areas and fuel prices. When fuel price volatility is factored in, a portfolio of FS and SS might be better than simply choosing either one for all vessels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1361-9209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2340</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Compliance portfolio ; Fuel switch ; Sulphur regulation ; Sulphur scrubber</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, 2023-03, Vol.116, p.103639, Article 103639</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Dian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jiehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Zhijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yadong</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal compliance choices for ocean carriers under the sulphur regulation</title><title>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment</title><description>This paper investigates how carriers adapt to the sulphur regulation by choosing between sulphur scrubber (SS) and fuel switching (FS). A cost minimization model is proposed to determine the optimal compliance choices, considering factors such as fuel prices, capital cost difference between SS and FS, and shipping service profile. We find that the optimal choice depends on the tradeoff between the capital cost advantage of FS and the fuel cost advantage of SS. And such a tradeoff is moderated by the vessel’s annual fuel consumption. Ignoring the speed differentiation behavior of FS vessels would exaggerate the benefits of SS. But whether it can cause a wrong compliance choice depends on the extent of overestimation, which depends on the presence in emission control areas and fuel prices. When fuel price volatility is factored in, a portfolio of FS and SS might be better than simply choosing either one for all vessels.</description><subject>Compliance portfolio</subject><subject>Fuel switch</subject><subject>Sulphur regulation</subject><subject>Sulphur scrubber</subject><issn>1361-9209</issn><issn>1879-2340</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHa-QMLYjp1ErFAFFFSpG1hbjjOhrtI4shMkbo-rsGY1fxZvNP8Rcs8gZ8DUwzGfQptz4CLtQon6gqxYVdYZFwVcpiwUy2oO9TW5ifEIAFJKtSLv-3FyJ9NT609j78xgkdqDdxYj7Xyg3qIZqDUhOAyRzkOLgU4HpHHux8McaMCvuTeT88MtuepMH_Hub67J58vzx2ab7favb5unXWaFgCnrQCJT2JQpAArkpVQKVcGxkcwYgVXVFGXDjQBZ2aJFI-tKVpASF3VbiDVhy10bfIwBOz2GVCH8aAb6LEMfdZKhzzL0IiMxjwuD6bHvVEVH6zCVbV1AO-nWu3_oXzYIaB4</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Sheng, Dian</creator><creator>Jiang, Jiehui</creator><creator>Wang, Hua</creator><creator>Tan, Zhijia</creator><creator>Wang, Yadong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Optimal compliance choices for ocean carriers under the sulphur regulation</title><author>Sheng, Dian ; Jiang, Jiehui ; Wang, Hua ; Tan, Zhijia ; Wang, Yadong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Compliance portfolio</topic><topic>Fuel switch</topic><topic>Sulphur regulation</topic><topic>Sulphur scrubber</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Dian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jiehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Zhijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yadong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheng, Dian</au><au>Jiang, Jiehui</au><au>Wang, Hua</au><au>Tan, Zhijia</au><au>Wang, Yadong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal compliance choices for ocean carriers under the sulphur regulation</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>103639</spage><pages>103639-</pages><artnum>103639</artnum><issn>1361-9209</issn><eissn>1879-2340</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates how carriers adapt to the sulphur regulation by choosing between sulphur scrubber (SS) and fuel switching (FS). A cost minimization model is proposed to determine the optimal compliance choices, considering factors such as fuel prices, capital cost difference between SS and FS, and shipping service profile. We find that the optimal choice depends on the tradeoff between the capital cost advantage of FS and the fuel cost advantage of SS. And such a tradeoff is moderated by the vessel’s annual fuel consumption. Ignoring the speed differentiation behavior of FS vessels would exaggerate the benefits of SS. But whether it can cause a wrong compliance choice depends on the extent of overestimation, which depends on the presence in emission control areas and fuel prices. When fuel price volatility is factored in, a portfolio of FS and SS might be better than simply choosing either one for all vessels.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trd.2023.103639</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1361-9209
ispartof Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, 2023-03, Vol.116, p.103639, Article 103639
issn 1361-9209
1879-2340
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trd_2023_103639
source Elsevier
subjects Compliance portfolio
Fuel switch
Sulphur regulation
Sulphur scrubber
title Optimal compliance choices for ocean carriers under the sulphur regulation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20compliance%20choices%20for%20ocean%20carriers%20under%20the%20sulphur%20regulation&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20D,%20Transport%20and%20environment&rft.au=Sheng,%20Dian&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=103639&rft.pages=103639-&rft.artnum=103639&rft.issn=1361-9209&rft.eissn=1879-2340&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103639&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1361920923000366%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f05e16eb7f050e3e27566e642eb51aa3e88b47b2a3058c4dea5985804de239d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true