Loading…
Successive treatments with ivermectin (3.15%) to control the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment
This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, the potential accumulation in the body of treated animals and the efficacy of ivermectin long-acting formulation (3.15%) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a scheme of three successive treatments. Fifteen 12-month-old hei...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ticks and tick-borne diseases 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.101848, Article 101848 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101848 |
container_title | Ticks and tick-borne diseases |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Sarli, Macarena Miró, María Victoria Rossner, María Victoria Nava, Santiago Lifschitz, Adrián |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, the potential accumulation in the body of treated animals and the efficacy of ivermectin long-acting formulation (3.15%) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a scheme of three successive treatments. Fifteen 12-month-old heifers, naturally infested with R. microplus, were divided into two groups (G). Cattle from GI (n = 10) were subjected to three treatments with ivermectin 3.15% (IVOMEC GOLD®, Merial Argentina S.A.) at a rate of 1 mL/50 kg on days 0, 35, and 70. Cattle from GII (n = 5) were not treated. From day 1 to 202 post-treatment blood samples were taken to measure ivermectin concentrations by HPLC and female ticks (4.5–8 mm) were counted to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The level of tick resistance to ivermectin was evaluated before and after finishing the scheme of successive treatments by larval immersion test (LIT) bioassay from engorged females collected from GI. The area under the concentration vs. time curves (AUC0–35d) obtained post-second treatment was 1.51 ± 0.39-fold higher than those observed post-first treatment (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101848 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ttbdis_2021_101848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877959X21002016</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1877959X21002016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLHEEQhRuJqBj_gUi_BPRhN32Z6Z3JQ0AlNxAUk4BvTW1NNdPrzoXuXsV_kp-bHkbzmH7p4lDn1OFj7FSKpRTSfNwsU1o3Pi6VUHKSqqLaY0eyWq0WtRH63dtc1g-H7CTGjchPy6JaqQN2qAtTGlGUR-zPzx0ixeifiKdAkDrqU-TPPrU8a6EjTL7n53opyw8XPA0chz6FYctTmx0eH_l960ePNLaw3UV-fjUMY-vzeME7j2EYJzVHIKS0pU_8roXQAQ6Pvqfs59A3nJzzCPjCIcZcZurwnu072EY6ef2P2e-vX35df1_c3H77cX15s0BtVFoYQFWRqHKChhrqAuQKC9EoJwvC2qmqLtdOglJSgsHKKELtnKpNqaEpa33Mijk3V40xkLNj8B2EFyuFnVjbjZ1Z24m1nVln29lsG3frjpp_pjeyeeHzvEC5_JOnYCN66pEaHzJT2wz-_xf-AmGalOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successive treatments with ivermectin (3.15%) to control the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Sarli, Macarena ; Miró, María Victoria ; Rossner, María Victoria ; Nava, Santiago ; Lifschitz, Adrián</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarli, Macarena ; Miró, María Victoria ; Rossner, María Victoria ; Nava, Santiago ; Lifschitz, Adrián</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, the potential accumulation in the body of treated animals and the efficacy of ivermectin long-acting formulation (3.15%) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a scheme of three successive treatments. Fifteen 12-month-old heifers, naturally infested with R. microplus, were divided into two groups (G). Cattle from GI (n = 10) were subjected to three treatments with ivermectin 3.15% (IVOMEC GOLD®, Merial Argentina S.A.) at a rate of 1 mL/50 kg on days 0, 35, and 70. Cattle from GII (n = 5) were not treated. From day 1 to 202 post-treatment blood samples were taken to measure ivermectin concentrations by HPLC and female ticks (4.5–8 mm) were counted to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The level of tick resistance to ivermectin was evaluated before and after finishing the scheme of successive treatments by larval immersion test (LIT) bioassay from engorged females collected from GI. The area under the concentration vs. time curves (AUC0–35d) obtained post-second treatment was 1.51 ± 0.39-fold higher than those observed post-first treatment (P<0.05). The mean plasma concentrations of ivermectin 3.15% at 20 days after the first, second and third treatment were 17.0, 27.5 and 37.8 ng/mL, respectively (P<0.01). The elimination half-life of ivermectin post-third treatment was significantly longer than that was previously reported after a single dose (P<0.01). Values of therapeutic efficacy percentage reached 75.6% post-first treatment and between 95.9 and 100% after the second treatment. Ticks evaluated by LIT showed a significant increase in lethal concentrations after treatments. Although the efficacy level was high, the successive treatments with long-acting ivermectin formulation generate a significant accumulation of drug in plasma and could increase the levels of resistance to this drug in the tick population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-959X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-9603</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101848</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34656045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Drug residues ; Ivermectin 3.15 ; Pharmacokinetics ; Rhipicephalus microplus ; Therapeutic efficacy</subject><ispartof>Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.101848, Article 101848</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7605-9744 ; 0000-0002-6359-7794 ; 0000-0001-8592-6635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarli, Macarena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, María Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossner, María Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifschitz, Adrián</creatorcontrib><title>Successive treatments with ivermectin (3.15%) to control the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment</title><title>Ticks and tick-borne diseases</title><addtitle>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, the potential accumulation in the body of treated animals and the efficacy of ivermectin long-acting formulation (3.15%) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a scheme of three successive treatments. Fifteen 12-month-old heifers, naturally infested with R. microplus, were divided into two groups (G). Cattle from GI (n = 10) were subjected to three treatments with ivermectin 3.15% (IVOMEC GOLD®, Merial Argentina S.A.) at a rate of 1 mL/50 kg on days 0, 35, and 70. Cattle from GII (n = 5) were not treated. From day 1 to 202 post-treatment blood samples were taken to measure ivermectin concentrations by HPLC and female ticks (4.5–8 mm) were counted to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The level of tick resistance to ivermectin was evaluated before and after finishing the scheme of successive treatments by larval immersion test (LIT) bioassay from engorged females collected from GI. The area under the concentration vs. time curves (AUC0–35d) obtained post-second treatment was 1.51 ± 0.39-fold higher than those observed post-first treatment (P<0.05). The mean plasma concentrations of ivermectin 3.15% at 20 days after the first, second and third treatment were 17.0, 27.5 and 37.8 ng/mL, respectively (P<0.01). The elimination half-life of ivermectin post-third treatment was significantly longer than that was previously reported after a single dose (P<0.01). Values of therapeutic efficacy percentage reached 75.6% post-first treatment and between 95.9 and 100% after the second treatment. Ticks evaluated by LIT showed a significant increase in lethal concentrations after treatments. Although the efficacy level was high, the successive treatments with long-acting ivermectin formulation generate a significant accumulation of drug in plasma and could increase the levels of resistance to this drug in the tick population.</description><subject>Drug residues</subject><subject>Ivermectin 3.15</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus microplus</subject><subject>Therapeutic efficacy</subject><issn>1877-959X</issn><issn>1877-9603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFtLHEEQhRuJqBj_gUi_BPRhN32Z6Z3JQ0AlNxAUk4BvTW1NNdPrzoXuXsV_kp-bHkbzmH7p4lDn1OFj7FSKpRTSfNwsU1o3Pi6VUHKSqqLaY0eyWq0WtRH63dtc1g-H7CTGjchPy6JaqQN2qAtTGlGUR-zPzx0ixeifiKdAkDrqU-TPPrU8a6EjTL7n53opyw8XPA0chz6FYctTmx0eH_l960ePNLaw3UV-fjUMY-vzeME7j2EYJzVHIKS0pU_8roXQAQ6Pvqfs59A3nJzzCPjCIcZcZurwnu072EY6ef2P2e-vX35df1_c3H77cX15s0BtVFoYQFWRqHKChhrqAuQKC9EoJwvC2qmqLtdOglJSgsHKKELtnKpNqaEpa33Mijk3V40xkLNj8B2EFyuFnVjbjZ1Z24m1nVln29lsG3frjpp_pjeyeeHzvEC5_JOnYCN66pEaHzJT2wz-_xf-AmGalOY</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Sarli, Macarena</creator><creator>Miró, María Victoria</creator><creator>Rossner, María Victoria</creator><creator>Nava, Santiago</creator><creator>Lifschitz, Adrián</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-9744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-7794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8592-6635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Successive treatments with ivermectin (3.15%) to control the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment</title><author>Sarli, Macarena ; Miró, María Victoria ; Rossner, María Victoria ; Nava, Santiago ; Lifschitz, Adrián</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Drug residues</topic><topic>Ivermectin 3.15</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus microplus</topic><topic>Therapeutic efficacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarli, Macarena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, María Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossner, María Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nava, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifschitz, Adrián</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ticks and tick-borne diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarli, Macarena</au><au>Miró, María Victoria</au><au>Rossner, María Victoria</au><au>Nava, Santiago</au><au>Lifschitz, Adrián</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successive treatments with ivermectin (3.15%) to control the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment</atitle><jtitle>Ticks and tick-borne diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101848</spage><pages>101848-</pages><artnum>101848</artnum><issn>1877-959X</issn><eissn>1877-9603</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, the potential accumulation in the body of treated animals and the efficacy of ivermectin long-acting formulation (3.15%) against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a scheme of three successive treatments. Fifteen 12-month-old heifers, naturally infested with R. microplus, were divided into two groups (G). Cattle from GI (n = 10) were subjected to three treatments with ivermectin 3.15% (IVOMEC GOLD®, Merial Argentina S.A.) at a rate of 1 mL/50 kg on days 0, 35, and 70. Cattle from GII (n = 5) were not treated. From day 1 to 202 post-treatment blood samples were taken to measure ivermectin concentrations by HPLC and female ticks (4.5–8 mm) were counted to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The level of tick resistance to ivermectin was evaluated before and after finishing the scheme of successive treatments by larval immersion test (LIT) bioassay from engorged females collected from GI. The area under the concentration vs. time curves (AUC0–35d) obtained post-second treatment was 1.51 ± 0.39-fold higher than those observed post-first treatment (P<0.05). The mean plasma concentrations of ivermectin 3.15% at 20 days after the first, second and third treatment were 17.0, 27.5 and 37.8 ng/mL, respectively (P<0.01). The elimination half-life of ivermectin post-third treatment was significantly longer than that was previously reported after a single dose (P<0.01). Values of therapeutic efficacy percentage reached 75.6% post-first treatment and between 95.9 and 100% after the second treatment. Ticks evaluated by LIT showed a significant increase in lethal concentrations after treatments. Although the efficacy level was high, the successive treatments with long-acting ivermectin formulation generate a significant accumulation of drug in plasma and could increase the levels of resistance to this drug in the tick population.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>34656045</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101848</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-9744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-7794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8592-6635</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-959X |
ispartof | Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.101848, Article 101848 |
issn | 1877-959X 1877-9603 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ttbdis_2021_101848 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Drug residues Ivermectin 3.15 Pharmacokinetics Rhipicephalus microplus Therapeutic efficacy |
title | Successive treatments with ivermectin (3.15%) to control the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy assessment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A23%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successive%20treatments%20with%20ivermectin%20(3.15%25)%20to%20control%20the%20tick%20Rhipicephalus%20(Boophilus)%20microplus%20in%20cattle:%20Pharmacokinetic%20and%20efficacy%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Ticks%20and%20tick-borne%20diseases&rft.au=Sarli,%20Macarena&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101848&rft.pages=101848-&rft.artnum=101848&rft.issn=1877-959X&rft.eissn=1877-9603&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101848&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1877959X21002016%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-6ac28e08eff3a9a94a17c40d2f14ec9f2895bf1a2211a6c862ec3ff29653ad593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34656045&rfr_iscdi=true |