Loading…
Evaluating method and potential risks of chlorine-resistant bacteria (CRB): A review
•Summarized the over-growth risks of non-pathogenic CRB.•Presented the genus, sources and chlorine resistance of all the isolated CRB strains.•Demonstrated the lack of widely-accepted method to evaluate chlorine resistance.•Proposed a recommended evaluating method for chlorine resistance.•Proposed a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2021-01, Vol.188, p.116474, Article 116474 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Summarized the over-growth risks of non-pathogenic CRB.•Presented the genus, sources and chlorine resistance of all the isolated CRB strains.•Demonstrated the lack of widely-accepted method to evaluate chlorine resistance.•Proposed a recommended evaluating method for chlorine resistance.•Proposed a quantitative definition of chlorine-resistant bacteria.
Chlorine-resistant bacteria (CRB) are commonly defined as bacteria with high resistance to chlorine disinfection or bacteria which can survive or even regrow in the residual chlorine. Chlorine disinfection cannot completely control the risks of CRB, such as risks of pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance and microbial growth. Currently, researchers pay more attention to CRB with pathogenicity or antibiotic resistance. The microbial growth risks of non-pathogenic CRB in water treatment and reclamation systems have been neglected to some extent. In this review, these three kinds of risks are all analyzed, and the last one is also highlighted. In order to study CRB, various methods are used to evaluate chlorine resistance. This review summarizes the evaluating methods for chlorine resistance reported in the literatures, and collects the important information about the typical isolated CRB strains including their genera, sources and levels of chlorine resistance. To our knowledge, few review papers have provided such systematic information about CRB. Among 44 typical CRB strains from 17 genera isolated by researchers, Mycobacterium, Bacillus, Legionella, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas were the five genera with the highest frequency of occurrence in literatures. They are all pathogenic or opportunistic pathogenic bacteria. In addition, although there are many studies on CRB, information about chlorine resistance level is still limited to specie level or strain level. The difference in chlorine resistance level among different bacterial genera is less well understood. An inconvenient truth is that there is still no widely-accepted method to evaluate chlorine resistance and to identify CRB. Due to the lack of a unified method, it is difficult to compare the results about chlorine resistance level of bacterial strains in different literatures. A recommended evaluating method using logarithmic removal rate as an index and E. coli as a reference strain is proposed in this review based on the summary of the current evaluating methods. This method can provide common range of chlorine resistance of each genus and it is con |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116474 |