The Strong 'Dual-Necessity’ principle for ranking social progress

• Published in: World development perspectives 2024-03, Vol.33, p.100559, Article 100559
• Main Author: Cohen Kaminitz, Shiri
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Capabilities; Concepts; Development; Rankings; Social progress; Subjective well-being
• ISSN: 2452-2929; 2452-2929
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2023.100559

•The paper introduces a concept of social progress termed “strong dual necessity” (SDN).•SDN requires both subjective and objective components, with no compensation between them.•The paper assesses the coherence, distinctiveness, operationalization and resonance of SDN.•A demonstration of how the SDN principle is operationalized is provided.•The demonstration showsthat the middle-ranked countries are the most impacted. How should we understand social progress, and how should it be measured? These questions have engaged social thinkers and scientists for many decades. In the context of the growing dominancy of national and international indices, the paper advances a strong dual-necessity principle in the conceptualization and measurement of social progress. At the heart of the strong dual-necessity principle is a profound yet neglected conviction that, from a political-normative point of view, the two components of the concept – subjective (representing people’s actual attitudes) and objective (representing external standards of development) – are necessary and only jointly sufficient. The paper defines the principle and initiates assessment and evaluation of it. The paper demonstrates ‘concept structuring’ and exhibits how the distinctive strong dual necessity structure may result in different rankings of countries’ social progress. Hence, it highlights the advantage of having this principle readily available and accessible for researchers, politicians, bureaucrats, and other interested agents and institutions.