Loading…
Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984
Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 3...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiocarbon 1990, Vol.32 (1), p.59-79 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63 |
container_end_page | 79 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Radiocarbon |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Bowman, S G E Ambers, J C Leese, M N |
description | Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 300 radiocarbon years. The individual revised results are tabulated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0033822200039953 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033822200039953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033822200039953</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0033822200039953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwFsOXleTTbJJjrb-K1SFquflbfKiW9rdknQVv727tHgRPL2BmfnBG0LOObvkjOurF8aEMHmes15Yq8QBGXErVaa0UodkNNjZ4B-Tk5SWjOW8MHpEnhaY3X7CqoNt3Ta0DXQS622dPuhjl7Bb0wX4unUQq969gS0mOkupQ08nuP1CbCi3hlFo_CDkKTkKsEp4tr9j8nZ3-zp9yObP97Pp9TyD3GqRCci1EZUUzgb0BTopjFUQLFTacYasAmYQbK688N4YJ3URTACHSqLGQowJ33FdbFOKGMpNrNcQv0vOymGQ8s8gfedi19lAcrAKERpXp99iwaVUhvcxsUfDuoq1f8dy2Xax6d_5B_4DRYhtkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984</title><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bowman, S G E ; Ambers, J C ; Leese, M N</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowman, S G E ; Ambers, J C ; Leese, M N</creatorcontrib><description>Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 300 radiocarbon years. The individual revised results are tabulated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-5755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033822200039953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Dating ; Excavation and methods ; Laboratory methods ; Methodology and general studies ; Prehistory and protohistory</subject><ispartof>Radiocarbon, 1990, Vol.32 (1), p.59-79</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1990 The American Journal of Science</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6144581$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowman, S G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambers, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leese, M N</creatorcontrib><title>Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984</title><title>Radiocarbon</title><addtitle>Radiocarbon</addtitle><description>Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 300 radiocarbon years. The individual revised results are tabulated.</description><subject>Dating</subject><subject>Excavation and methods</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><issn>0033-8222</issn><issn>1945-5755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwFsOXleTTbJJjrb-K1SFquflbfKiW9rdknQVv727tHgRPL2BmfnBG0LOObvkjOurF8aEMHmes15Yq8QBGXErVaa0UodkNNjZ4B-Tk5SWjOW8MHpEnhaY3X7CqoNt3Ta0DXQS622dPuhjl7Bb0wX4unUQq969gS0mOkupQ08nuP1CbCi3hlFo_CDkKTkKsEp4tr9j8nZ3-zp9yObP97Pp9TyD3GqRCci1EZUUzgb0BTopjFUQLFTacYasAmYQbK688N4YJ3URTACHSqLGQowJ33FdbFOKGMpNrNcQv0vOymGQ8s8gfedi19lAcrAKERpXp99iwaVUhvcxsUfDuoq1f8dy2Xax6d_5B_4DRYhtkg</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Bowman, S G E</creator><creator>Ambers, J C</creator><creator>Leese, M N</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Arizona</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984</title><author>Bowman, S G E ; Ambers, J C ; Leese, M N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Dating</topic><topic>Excavation and methods</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowman, S G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambers, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leese, M N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiocarbon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowman, S G E</au><au>Ambers, J C</au><au>Leese, M N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984</atitle><jtitle>Radiocarbon</jtitle><addtitle>Radiocarbon</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>59-79</pages><issn>0033-8222</issn><eissn>1945-5755</eissn><abstract>Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 300 radiocarbon years. The individual revised results are tabulated.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0033822200039953</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8222 |
ispartof | Radiocarbon, 1990, Vol.32 (1), p.59-79 |
issn | 0033-8222 1945-5755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033822200039953 |
source | Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Dating Excavation and methods Laboratory methods Methodology and general studies Prehistory and protohistory |
title | Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A48%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-Evaluation%20of%20British%20Museum%20Radiocarbon%20Dates%20Issued%20Between%201980%20and%201984&rft.jtitle=Radiocarbon&rft.au=Bowman,%20S%20G%20E&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=59-79&rft.issn=0033-8222&rft.eissn=1945-5755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033822200039953&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S0033822200039953%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2973-3a2783b43c9fed6ec43895af9ab7c10e0ba08ea925d3dd88c476f8face54e7e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033822200039953&rfr_iscdi=true |