Loading…

Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment

Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 1990-04, Vol.4 (2), p.226-234
Main Authors: Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada), Deschamps, R.J.A, McDermott, M.R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493
container_end_page 234
container_issue 2
container_start_page 226
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 4
creator Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)
Deschamps, R.J.A
McDermott, M.R
description Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0890037X00025318
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00025318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3987065</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3987065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoWKsfoLjID4y-TOZNMkspWgsFF7XgbshM3tgUJ6NJKvTvnVJx4-pyOZy7uIxdC7gTINT9CnQFINUbAOQohT5hE4EIWa4KOGWTA84O_JxdxLgFEGWew4TNFn2_84OJ0ewjTwO3lKhN3HjLv3bGJ5dMIr6h0LjWWYrceZ42xMl_uzD4nny6ZGed-Yh09ZtTtn56fJ09Z8uX-WL2sMzaXGDKEKk0lQYhZVtZFAat0qSExrEUhGXXKGo7pTQqCVaDGVnRCdsYqJqiklMmjrttGGIM1NWfwfUm7GsB9eGF-t8Lo3N7dLYxDeFPkJVWUOKIb464M0Nt3oOL9XpVCUDQKH8ArsZhNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) ; Deschamps, R.J.A ; McDermott, M.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) ; Deschamps, R.J.A ; McDermott, M.R</creatorcontrib><description>Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0890037X00025318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO ; ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE ; ANTIBODIES ; ANTICORPS ; ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL ; ANTICUERPOS ; ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES ; Antigens ; B lymphocytes ; CHEMISTRY ; CHIMIE ; DETECTION ; direct elisa ; ELISA ; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ; Feature ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDES ; Immunoassay ; IMMUNOLOGIE ; IMMUNOLOGY ; indirect elisa ; INMUNOLOGIA ; Molecules ; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES ; Pesticides ; PICLORAM ; PICLORAME ; PICLORAN ; polyclonal antibodies ; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ; QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES ; QUIMICA ; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY ; RESIDU ; RESIDUES ; RESIDUOS ; Spleen cells ; TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE ; TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS ; TEST ELISA</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1990-04, Vol.4 (2), p.226-234</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3987065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3987065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, R.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, M.R</creatorcontrib><title>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO</subject><subject>ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE</subject><subject>ANTIBODIES</subject><subject>ANTICORPS</subject><subject>ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL</subject><subject>ANTICUERPOS</subject><subject>ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>B lymphocytes</subject><subject>CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>CHIMIE</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>direct elisa</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Feature</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>IMMUNOLOGIE</subject><subject>IMMUNOLOGY</subject><subject>indirect elisa</subject><subject>INMUNOLOGIA</subject><subject>Molecules</subject><subject>MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>PICLORAM</subject><subject>PICLORAME</subject><subject>PICLORAN</subject><subject>polyclonal antibodies</subject><subject>QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>QUIMICA</subject><subject>RADIOIMMUNOASSAY</subject><subject>RESIDU</subject><subject>RESIDUES</subject><subject>RESIDUOS</subject><subject>Spleen cells</subject><subject>TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE</subject><subject>TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS</subject><subject>TEST ELISA</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoWKsfoLjID4y-TOZNMkspWgsFF7XgbshM3tgUJ6NJKvTvnVJx4-pyOZy7uIxdC7gTINT9CnQFINUbAOQohT5hE4EIWa4KOGWTA84O_JxdxLgFEGWew4TNFn2_84OJ0ewjTwO3lKhN3HjLv3bGJ5dMIr6h0LjWWYrceZ42xMl_uzD4nny6ZGed-Yh09ZtTtn56fJ09Z8uX-WL2sMzaXGDKEKk0lQYhZVtZFAat0qSExrEUhGXXKGo7pTQqCVaDGVnRCdsYqJqiklMmjrttGGIM1NWfwfUm7GsB9eGF-t8Lo3N7dLYxDeFPkJVWUOKIb464M0Nt3oOL9XpVCUDQKH8ArsZhNA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</creator><creator>Deschamps, R.J.A</creator><creator>McDermott, M.R</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</title><author>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) ; Deschamps, R.J.A ; McDermott, M.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO</topic><topic>ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE</topic><topic>ANTIBODIES</topic><topic>ANTICORPS</topic><topic>ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL</topic><topic>ANTICUERPOS</topic><topic>ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>B lymphocytes</topic><topic>CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>CHIMIE</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>direct elisa</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Feature</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>IMMUNOLOGIE</topic><topic>IMMUNOLOGY</topic><topic>indirect elisa</topic><topic>INMUNOLOGIA</topic><topic>Molecules</topic><topic>MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>PICLORAM</topic><topic>PICLORAME</topic><topic>PICLORAN</topic><topic>polyclonal antibodies</topic><topic>QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>QUIMICA</topic><topic>RADIOIMMUNOASSAY</topic><topic>RESIDU</topic><topic>RESIDUES</topic><topic>RESIDUOS</topic><topic>Spleen cells</topic><topic>TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE</topic><topic>TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS</topic><topic>TEST ELISA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, R.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, M.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</au><au>Deschamps, R.J.A</au><au>McDermott, M.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>226-234</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.</abstract><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/S0890037X00025318</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 1990-04, Vol.4 (2), p.226-234
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00025318
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects 2,4-D
ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO
ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE
ANTIBODIES
ANTICORPS
ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL
ANTICUERPOS
ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES
Antigens
B lymphocytes
CHEMISTRY
CHIMIE
DETECTION
direct elisa
ELISA
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
Feature
HERBICIDAS
HERBICIDE
HERBICIDES
Immunoassay
IMMUNOLOGIE
IMMUNOLOGY
indirect elisa
INMUNOLOGIA
Molecules
MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES
Pesticides
PICLORAM
PICLORAME
PICLORAN
polyclonal antibodies
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
QUIMICA
RADIOIMMUNOASSAY
RESIDU
RESIDUES
RESIDUOS
Spleen cells
TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE
TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS
TEST ELISA
title Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunoassays%20to%20detect%20and%20quantitate%20herbicides%20in%20the%20environment&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Hall,%20J.C.%20(Univ.%20Guelph,%20Guelph,%20Ont.,%20Canada)&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=226-234&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0890037X00025318&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3987065%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3987065&rfr_iscdi=true