Loading…
Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment
Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 1990-04, Vol.4 (2), p.226-234 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493 |
container_end_page | 234 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 226 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) Deschamps, R.J.A McDermott, M.R |
description | Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0890037X00025318 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00025318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3987065</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3987065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoWKsfoLjID4y-TOZNMkspWgsFF7XgbshM3tgUJ6NJKvTvnVJx4-pyOZy7uIxdC7gTINT9CnQFINUbAOQohT5hE4EIWa4KOGWTA84O_JxdxLgFEGWew4TNFn2_84OJ0ewjTwO3lKhN3HjLv3bGJ5dMIr6h0LjWWYrceZ42xMl_uzD4nny6ZGed-Yh09ZtTtn56fJ09Z8uX-WL2sMzaXGDKEKk0lQYhZVtZFAat0qSExrEUhGXXKGo7pTQqCVaDGVnRCdsYqJqiklMmjrttGGIM1NWfwfUm7GsB9eGF-t8Lo3N7dLYxDeFPkJVWUOKIb464M0Nt3oOL9XpVCUDQKH8ArsZhNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) ; Deschamps, R.J.A ; McDermott, M.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) ; Deschamps, R.J.A ; McDermott, M.R</creatorcontrib><description>Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0890037X00025318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO ; ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE ; ANTIBODIES ; ANTICORPS ; ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL ; ANTICUERPOS ; ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES ; Antigens ; B lymphocytes ; CHEMISTRY ; CHIMIE ; DETECTION ; direct elisa ; ELISA ; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ; Feature ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDES ; Immunoassay ; IMMUNOLOGIE ; IMMUNOLOGY ; indirect elisa ; INMUNOLOGIA ; Molecules ; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES ; Pesticides ; PICLORAM ; PICLORAME ; PICLORAN ; polyclonal antibodies ; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ; QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES ; QUIMICA ; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY ; RESIDU ; RESIDUES ; RESIDUOS ; Spleen cells ; TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE ; TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS ; TEST ELISA</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1990-04, Vol.4 (2), p.226-234</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3987065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3987065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, R.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, M.R</creatorcontrib><title>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO</subject><subject>ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE</subject><subject>ANTIBODIES</subject><subject>ANTICORPS</subject><subject>ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL</subject><subject>ANTICUERPOS</subject><subject>ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>B lymphocytes</subject><subject>CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>CHIMIE</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>direct elisa</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Feature</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>IMMUNOLOGIE</subject><subject>IMMUNOLOGY</subject><subject>indirect elisa</subject><subject>INMUNOLOGIA</subject><subject>Molecules</subject><subject>MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>PICLORAM</subject><subject>PICLORAME</subject><subject>PICLORAN</subject><subject>polyclonal antibodies</subject><subject>QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>QUIMICA</subject><subject>RADIOIMMUNOASSAY</subject><subject>RESIDU</subject><subject>RESIDUES</subject><subject>RESIDUOS</subject><subject>Spleen cells</subject><subject>TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE</subject><subject>TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS</subject><subject>TEST ELISA</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoWKsfoLjID4y-TOZNMkspWgsFF7XgbshM3tgUJ6NJKvTvnVJx4-pyOZy7uIxdC7gTINT9CnQFINUbAOQohT5hE4EIWa4KOGWTA84O_JxdxLgFEGWew4TNFn2_84OJ0ewjTwO3lKhN3HjLv3bGJ5dMIr6h0LjWWYrceZ42xMl_uzD4nny6ZGed-Yh09ZtTtn56fJ09Z8uX-WL2sMzaXGDKEKk0lQYhZVtZFAat0qSExrEUhGXXKGo7pTQqCVaDGVnRCdsYqJqiklMmjrttGGIM1NWfwfUm7GsB9eGF-t8Lo3N7dLYxDeFPkJVWUOKIb464M0Nt3oOL9XpVCUDQKH8ArsZhNA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</creator><creator>Deschamps, R.J.A</creator><creator>McDermott, M.R</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</title><author>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada) ; Deschamps, R.J.A ; McDermott, M.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO</topic><topic>ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE</topic><topic>ANTIBODIES</topic><topic>ANTICORPS</topic><topic>ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL</topic><topic>ANTICUERPOS</topic><topic>ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>B lymphocytes</topic><topic>CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>CHIMIE</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>direct elisa</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Feature</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>IMMUNOLOGIE</topic><topic>IMMUNOLOGY</topic><topic>indirect elisa</topic><topic>INMUNOLOGIA</topic><topic>Molecules</topic><topic>MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>PICLORAM</topic><topic>PICLORAME</topic><topic>PICLORAN</topic><topic>polyclonal antibodies</topic><topic>QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>QUIMICA</topic><topic>RADIOIMMUNOASSAY</topic><topic>RESIDU</topic><topic>RESIDUES</topic><topic>RESIDUOS</topic><topic>Spleen cells</topic><topic>TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE</topic><topic>TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS</topic><topic>TEST ELISA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, R.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, M.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, J.C. (Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada)</au><au>Deschamps, R.J.A</au><au>McDermott, M.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>226-234</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Immunochemical techniques offer many advantages over chromatographic methods used for pesticide trace analysis of substrates such as soil, water, plants, urine, and blood. These advantages include speed of processing samples, high specificity for detecting a pesticide, reduced amount of preparation and cleanup of the sample before analysis, and a dramatic increase in the number of samples that can be analyzed. Immunoassays are based on the principle that antibodies to pesticides can be prepared, in animals, that can recognize and attach with exquisite specificity to certain chemical configurations displayed on the surface of a molecule. Small molecules such as herbicides usually are not immunogenic but can be made so by chemically bonding them to a large immunogenic protein such as bovine serum blbumin before injection into an animal. Development of herbicide-specific antibodies and their use in direct and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA or ELISA) as well as radioimmunoassays (RIA) are discussed. The principles behind monoclonal antibody production are outlined, and immunoassays using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are compared. Specific reference is made to the development and use of indirect ELISA and RIA procedures for trace analysis of 2,4-D and picloram.</abstract><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/S0890037X00025318</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 1990-04, Vol.4 (2), p.226-234 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00025318 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | 2,4-D ANALISIS CUANTITATIVO ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE ANTIBODIES ANTICORPS ANTICORPS MONOCLONAL ANTICUERPOS ANTICUERPOS MONOCLONALES Antigens B lymphocytes CHEMISTRY CHIMIE DETECTION direct elisa ELISA Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay Feature HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE HERBICIDES Immunoassay IMMUNOLOGIE IMMUNOLOGY indirect elisa INMUNOLOGIA Molecules MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES Pesticides PICLORAM PICLORAME PICLORAN polyclonal antibodies QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES QUIMICA RADIOIMMUNOASSAY RESIDU RESIDUES RESIDUOS Spleen cells TECHNIQUE RADIOIMMUNOLOGIQUE TECNICAS RADIOINMUNOLOGICAS TEST ELISA |
title | Immunoassays to detect and quantitate herbicides in the environment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunoassays%20to%20detect%20and%20quantitate%20herbicides%20in%20the%20environment&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Hall,%20J.C.%20(Univ.%20Guelph,%20Guelph,%20Ont.,%20Canada)&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=226-234&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0890037X00025318&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3987065%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-55e6a980133c9d51a5d78e7185d514e56fb7ecf7785730d80a7184f1dba09b493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3987065&rfr_iscdi=true |