Loading…
Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr
Sixteen applications of imazapyr and other herbicides were made to field bindweed from 1982 to 1986. Control with imazapyr was 89% or more 1 yr after treatment at 0.14 kg ai ha-1when plants were growing vigorously at application. Only 1 of 16 applications of imazapyr at 0.56 kg ha-1controlled less t...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Weed technology 1990-10, Vol.4 (4), p.771-775 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173 |
| container_end_page | 775 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 771 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX) Wiese, A.F Wood, M.L |
| description | Sixteen applications of imazapyr and other herbicides were made to field bindweed from 1982 to 1986. Control with imazapyr was 89% or more 1 yr after treatment at 0.14 kg ai ha-1when plants were growing vigorously at application. Only 1 of 16 applications of imazapyr at 0.56 kg ha-1controlled less than 90% regardless of plant vigor. Control at 0.56 kg ha-1was usually superior to that obtained with dicamba at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ae ha-1, and 2,4-D at 1.1 kg ae ha-1, as well as combinations of picloram with either 2,4-D or dicamba. All herbicides were less effective when applied to field bindweed with poor vigor. Winter wheat planted in the fall up to 122 days after application was injured 20 to 88% by imazapyr at 0.14 kg ha-1. Sorghum planted the next spring was injured 15% or less by imazapyr at 0.14 and 0.28 kg ha-1. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0890037X00026373 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00026373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3986744</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3986744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj0FLwzAYhoMoOKc_QPGQox6q35c0TYonGZsKAw9z4K2kTaIdtRlJ1zF_vRsVL57ew8Pz8r6EXCLcIaC8X4DKAbh8BwCWccmPyAiFgITJFI7J6ICTAz8lZzGuADBjDEbkYVbbxtCybs3WWkNvJr7tfdNvmk2kOvS2jXW8pZVvu-Abuq27T1p_6W-93oVzcuJ0E-3Fb47JcjZ9mzwn89enl8njPKkYii7hYEqlIGXIpcO8BAOlylil0QhhXSm0NdZWQkp0Is0FVE5YBopzzpRDyccEh94q-BiDdcU67DeEXYFQHN4X_97vnevBWcXOhz-B5yqTabrHVwN22hf6I9SxWC5yDioTOf8B6U5eQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX) ; Wiese, A.F ; Wood, M.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX) ; Wiese, A.F ; Wood, M.L</creatorcontrib><description>Sixteen applications of imazapyr and other herbicides were made to field bindweed from 1982 to 1986. Control with imazapyr was 89% or more 1 yr after treatment at 0.14 kg ai ha-1when plants were growing vigorously at application. Only 1 of 16 applications of imazapyr at 0.56 kg ha-1controlled less than 90% regardless of plant vigor. Control at 0.56 kg ha-1was usually superior to that obtained with dicamba at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ae ha-1, and 2,4-D at 1.1 kg ae ha-1, as well as combinations of picloram with either 2,4-D or dicamba. All herbicides were less effective when applied to field bindweed with poor vigor. Winter wheat planted in the fall up to 122 days after application was injured 20 to 88% by imazapyr at 0.14 kg ha-1. Sorghum planted the next spring was injured 15% or less by imazapyr at 0.14 and 0.28 kg ha-1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0890037X00026373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; APPLICATION RATES ; CHEMICAL CONTROL ; CONTROL QUIMICO ; CONVOLVULACEAE ; CROP DAMAGE ; CROP LOSSES ; DESHERBAGE ; DICAMBA ; DOSE D'APPLICATION ; DOSIS DE APLICACION ; EFECTOS RESIDUALES ; EFFET RESIDUEL ; ESCARDA ; FITOTOXICIDAD ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDE MIXTURES ; HERBICIDES ; LUTTE CHIMIQUE ; MADUREZ ; MATURITE ; MATURITY ; MATURITY STAGE ; PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA ; Perennial weeds ; PERTE DE RECOLTE ; PHYTOTOXICITE ; PHYTOTOXICITY ; PICLORAM ; PICLORAME ; PICLORAN ; Planting ; Planting seasons ; Plants ; RESIDUAL EFFECTS ; Soil treatment ; Soil water ; Sorghum ; SORGHUM BICOLOR ; Summer ; TEXAS ; TRITICUM AESTIVUM ; WEED CONTROL ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1990-10, Vol.4 (4), p.771-775</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3986744$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3986744$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiese, A.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, M.L</creatorcontrib><title>Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Sixteen applications of imazapyr and other herbicides were made to field bindweed from 1982 to 1986. Control with imazapyr was 89% or more 1 yr after treatment at 0.14 kg ai ha-1when plants were growing vigorously at application. Only 1 of 16 applications of imazapyr at 0.56 kg ha-1controlled less than 90% regardless of plant vigor. Control at 0.56 kg ha-1was usually superior to that obtained with dicamba at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ae ha-1, and 2,4-D at 1.1 kg ae ha-1, as well as combinations of picloram with either 2,4-D or dicamba. All herbicides were less effective when applied to field bindweed with poor vigor. Winter wheat planted in the fall up to 122 days after application was injured 20 to 88% by imazapyr at 0.14 kg ha-1. Sorghum planted the next spring was injured 15% or less by imazapyr at 0.14 and 0.28 kg ha-1.</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>APPLICATION RATES</subject><subject>CHEMICAL CONTROL</subject><subject>CONTROL QUIMICO</subject><subject>CONVOLVULACEAE</subject><subject>CROP DAMAGE</subject><subject>CROP LOSSES</subject><subject>DESHERBAGE</subject><subject>DICAMBA</subject><subject>DOSE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>DOSIS DE APLICACION</subject><subject>EFECTOS RESIDUALES</subject><subject>EFFET RESIDUEL</subject><subject>ESCARDA</subject><subject>FITOTOXICIDAD</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDE MIXTURES</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>MADUREZ</subject><subject>MATURITE</subject><subject>MATURITY</subject><subject>MATURITY STAGE</subject><subject>PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA</subject><subject>Perennial weeds</subject><subject>PERTE DE RECOLTE</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITE</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITY</subject><subject>PICLORAM</subject><subject>PICLORAME</subject><subject>PICLORAN</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Planting seasons</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>RESIDUAL EFFECTS</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>SORGHUM BICOLOR</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>TEXAS</subject><subject>TRITICUM AESTIVUM</subject><subject>WEED CONTROL</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj0FLwzAYhoMoOKc_QPGQox6q35c0TYonGZsKAw9z4K2kTaIdtRlJ1zF_vRsVL57ew8Pz8r6EXCLcIaC8X4DKAbh8BwCWccmPyAiFgITJFI7J6ICTAz8lZzGuADBjDEbkYVbbxtCybs3WWkNvJr7tfdNvmk2kOvS2jXW8pZVvu-Abuq27T1p_6W-93oVzcuJ0E-3Fb47JcjZ9mzwn89enl8njPKkYii7hYEqlIGXIpcO8BAOlylil0QhhXSm0NdZWQkp0Is0FVE5YBopzzpRDyccEh94q-BiDdcU67DeEXYFQHN4X_97vnevBWcXOhz-B5yqTabrHVwN22hf6I9SxWC5yDioTOf8B6U5eQw</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX)</creator><creator>Wiese, A.F</creator><creator>Wood, M.L</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr</title><author>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX) ; Wiese, A.F ; Wood, M.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>APPLICATION RATES</topic><topic>CHEMICAL CONTROL</topic><topic>CONTROL QUIMICO</topic><topic>CONVOLVULACEAE</topic><topic>CROP DAMAGE</topic><topic>CROP LOSSES</topic><topic>DESHERBAGE</topic><topic>DICAMBA</topic><topic>DOSE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>DOSIS DE APLICACION</topic><topic>EFECTOS RESIDUALES</topic><topic>EFFET RESIDUEL</topic><topic>ESCARDA</topic><topic>FITOTOXICIDAD</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDE MIXTURES</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>MADUREZ</topic><topic>MATURITE</topic><topic>MATURITY</topic><topic>MATURITY STAGE</topic><topic>PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA</topic><topic>Perennial weeds</topic><topic>PERTE DE RECOLTE</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITE</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITY</topic><topic>PICLORAM</topic><topic>PICLORAME</topic><topic>PICLORAN</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Planting seasons</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>RESIDUAL EFFECTS</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>SORGHUM BICOLOR</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>TEXAS</topic><topic>TRITICUM AESTIVUM</topic><topic>WEED CONTROL</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiese, A.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, M.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schoenhals, M.G. (Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Bushland, TX)</au><au>Wiese, A.F</au><au>Wood, M.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>771-775</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Sixteen applications of imazapyr and other herbicides were made to field bindweed from 1982 to 1986. Control with imazapyr was 89% or more 1 yr after treatment at 0.14 kg ai ha-1when plants were growing vigorously at application. Only 1 of 16 applications of imazapyr at 0.56 kg ha-1controlled less than 90% regardless of plant vigor. Control at 0.56 kg ha-1was usually superior to that obtained with dicamba at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ae ha-1, and 2,4-D at 1.1 kg ae ha-1, as well as combinations of picloram with either 2,4-D or dicamba. All herbicides were less effective when applied to field bindweed with poor vigor. Winter wheat planted in the fall up to 122 days after application was injured 20 to 88% by imazapyr at 0.14 kg ha-1. Sorghum planted the next spring was injured 15% or less by imazapyr at 0.14 and 0.28 kg ha-1.</abstract><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/S0890037X00026373</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 1990-10, Vol.4 (4), p.771-775 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00026373 |
| source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
| subjects | 2,4-D APPLICATION RATES CHEMICAL CONTROL CONTROL QUIMICO CONVOLVULACEAE CROP DAMAGE CROP LOSSES DESHERBAGE DICAMBA DOSE D'APPLICATION DOSIS DE APLICACION EFECTOS RESIDUALES EFFET RESIDUEL ESCARDA FITOTOXICIDAD HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE HERBICIDE MIXTURES HERBICIDES LUTTE CHIMIQUE MADUREZ MATURITE MATURITY MATURITY STAGE PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA Perennial weeds PERTE DE RECOLTE PHYTOTOXICITE PHYTOTOXICITY PICLORAM PICLORAME PICLORAN Planting Planting seasons Plants RESIDUAL EFFECTS Soil treatment Soil water Sorghum SORGHUM BICOLOR Summer TEXAS TRITICUM AESTIVUM WEED CONTROL Wheat |
| title | Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20bindweed%20(Convolvulus%20arvensis)%20control%20with%20imazapyr&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Schoenhals,%20M.G.%20(Texas%20Agric.%20Exp.%20Stn.,%20Bushland,%20TX)&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=771-775&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0890037X00026373&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3986744%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-30db88042137f19b0d0b862ca1d55efb5aedeec5771f54950cf5e20833328f173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3986744&rfr_iscdi=true |