Exploring Arbitrariness Objections to Time Biases

There are two kinds of time bias: near bias and future bias. While philosophers typically hold that near bias is rationally impermissible, many hold that future bias is rationally permissible. Call this normative hybridism . According to arbitrariness objections, certain patterns of preference are r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2024-09, Vol.10 (3), p.588-614
Main Authors: LATHAM, ANDREW J., MILLER, KRISTIE, OH, JORDAN, SHPALL, SAM, YU, WEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There are two kinds of time bias: near bias and future bias. While philosophers typically hold that near bias is rationally impermissible, many hold that future bias is rationally permissible. Call this normative hybridism . According to arbitrariness objections, certain patterns of preference are rationally impermissible because they are arbitrary. While arbitrariness objections have been leveled against both near bias and future bias, the kind of arbitrariness in question has been different. In this article we investigate whether there are forms of arbitrariness that are common to both kinds of preferences and, hence, whether there are versions of the arbitrariness objection that are objections to both near bias and future bias. If there are, then this might go some way toward undermining normative hybridism and to defending thoroughgoing time-neutralism.
ISSN:2053-4477
2053-4485
DOI:10.1017/apa.2023.14