Loading…

Influence of Flue Gas Conditions on Mercury Removal by Activated Carbon Injection in a Pilot-Scale Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion System

The synergistic removal of mercury by injecting activated carbon between the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and fabric filter (FF) as well as some influencing factors were investigated in a pilot-scale 0.3 MWth circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustion system. The Ontario Hydro Method (OHM) wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2019-08, Vol.58 (34), p.15553-15561
Main Authors: Huang, Tianfang, Duan, Yufeng, Luo, Zhengkang, Zhao, Shilin, Geng, Xinze, Xu, Yifan, Huang, Yaji, Wei, Hongqi, Ren, Shaojun, Wang, Hu, Gu, Xiaobing
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The synergistic removal of mercury by injecting activated carbon between the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and fabric filter (FF) as well as some influencing factors were investigated in a pilot-scale 0.3 MWth circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustion system. The Ontario Hydro Method (OHM) was used to sample mercury in the coal-fired flue gas. The gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0), gaseous oxidized mercury (Hg2+), particle-bound mercury (Hgp) in the flue gas after the boiler, SCR, activated carbon injection (ACI) device, FF, and wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) were sampled simultaneously, and the flue gas components were monitored online. The results showed that the mercury removal efficiency of the SCR+ACI+FF system (SAFs) and the proportion of HgP after ACI increased with the increase of the flue gas temperature. The mercury removal efficiency decreased with incremental SO2 concentration probably due to its suppressive effect on the combination of mercury and halogen and its competitive adsorption with mercury. The higher NO concentration can improve the mercury removal efficiency resulting from Hg0 oxidation by NO2, which could counteract its adverse effect on mercury oxidation in SCR. The FF device not only could capture all HgP but also had a considerable effect on gaseous mercury. The synergistic mercury removal efficiency of the ACI and air pollution control devices (APCDs) system was more than 97.4%. The presented work could provide useful information and guidance for the optimization of the operational parameters of the ACI+APCDs mercury removal technology.
ISSN:0888-5885
1520-5045
DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02982