Loading…

Binary and Ternary Blends of Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)

Binary and ternary blends of polystyrene-block-poly(p-hydroxystyrene) (MW = 1 × 104−1 × 104) with various homopolymers were studied. In binary blends, in which the homopolymers poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(p-vinylpyridine) (PVPy), and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) had attractive interactions via...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Macromolecules 1997-11, Vol.30 (23), p.7119-7126
Main Authors: Zhao, J. Q, Pearce, E. M, Kwei, T. K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793
container_end_page 7126
container_issue 23
container_start_page 7119
container_title Macromolecules
container_volume 30
creator Zhao, J. Q
Pearce, E. M
Kwei, T. K
description Binary and ternary blends of polystyrene-block-poly(p-hydroxystyrene) (MW = 1 × 104−1 × 104) with various homopolymers were studied. In binary blends, in which the homopolymers poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(p-vinylpyridine) (PVPy), and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) had attractive interactions via hydrogen-bonding with the poly(p-hydroxystyrene) block but were immiscible with the polystyrene block, microphase separation played a dominant role in morphology development. The attractive interaction parameter appeared to be the major factor that influenced the phase separation mechanism. The results obtained with three different molecular weights of PEO suggested that the molecular weight effect was not important when the attractive interaction parameter was sufficiently strong. In PVPy/copolymer blends, microphase separation was also prevalent, but phase separation in PnBA/copolymer blends seemed to follow the macro−micro mechanism. In blends of the diblock copolymer with poly(vinyl methyl ether), which was miscible with both blocks, the latter acted as a polymeric solvent for the copolymer and gave a single-phase mixture when present in sufficient amount. The addition of the block copolymer reduced the domain size in PS/poly(ethyloxazoline) blends. In PS/poly(methyl methacrylate) and PS/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) blends, the morphology changed to a cocontinuous pattern upon incorporation of the copolymer.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ma970735x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_ma970735x</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>b067705206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_8EeFOwhmu9sjrZUqxasWEG8hGya4Lbb3ZKs0P33bl3tydMM8z7z8Q4A5xhdY0TwzdooiSTl2wPQw5wgyFPKD0EPIcKgIkoeg5MYlwhhzBntgfEwL01oElMukrkLP_mwcOUiJpVPZlXRxLoJrnQwKyq7grvK1QZ-NotQbf-0wSk48qaI7uw39sHb3Xg-msDp8_3D6HYKDVWohhZnTGTcIEeIxchTmUmeOWsyjw3hhCmaMeKEVUJ6SoVMUyc98lJ4lgqpaB8Murk2VDEG5_Um5Ov2Zo2R3vnXe_8te9GxGxOtKXwwpc3jvoEgiQmnLQY7LI-12-5lE1ZaSCq5ns9e9Qt-f2KTR6E_Wv6y442Nell9tS8r4j_rvwFHY3Vp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Binary and Ternary Blends of Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Zhao, J. Q ; Pearce, E. M ; Kwei, T. K</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, J. Q ; Pearce, E. M ; Kwei, T. K</creatorcontrib><description>Binary and ternary blends of polystyrene-block-poly(p-hydroxystyrene) (MW = 1 × 104−1 × 104) with various homopolymers were studied. In binary blends, in which the homopolymers poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(p-vinylpyridine) (PVPy), and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) had attractive interactions via hydrogen-bonding with the poly(p-hydroxystyrene) block but were immiscible with the polystyrene block, microphase separation played a dominant role in morphology development. The attractive interaction parameter appeared to be the major factor that influenced the phase separation mechanism. The results obtained with three different molecular weights of PEO suggested that the molecular weight effect was not important when the attractive interaction parameter was sufficiently strong. In PVPy/copolymer blends, microphase separation was also prevalent, but phase separation in PnBA/copolymer blends seemed to follow the macro−micro mechanism. In blends of the diblock copolymer with poly(vinyl methyl ether), which was miscible with both blocks, the latter acted as a polymeric solvent for the copolymer and gave a single-phase mixture when present in sufficient amount. The addition of the block copolymer reduced the domain size in PS/poly(ethyloxazoline) blends. In PS/poly(methyl methacrylate) and PS/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) blends, the morphology changed to a cocontinuous pattern upon incorporation of the copolymer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-9297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5835</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ma970735x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MAMOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Organic polymers ; Physicochemistry of polymers ; Properties and characterization ; Thermal and thermodynamic properties</subject><ispartof>Macromolecules, 1997-11, Vol.30 (23), p.7119-7126</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2071253$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, J. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwei, T. K</creatorcontrib><title>Binary and Ternary Blends of Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)</title><title>Macromolecules</title><addtitle>Macromolecules</addtitle><description>Binary and ternary blends of polystyrene-block-poly(p-hydroxystyrene) (MW = 1 × 104−1 × 104) with various homopolymers were studied. In binary blends, in which the homopolymers poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(p-vinylpyridine) (PVPy), and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) had attractive interactions via hydrogen-bonding with the poly(p-hydroxystyrene) block but were immiscible with the polystyrene block, microphase separation played a dominant role in morphology development. The attractive interaction parameter appeared to be the major factor that influenced the phase separation mechanism. The results obtained with three different molecular weights of PEO suggested that the molecular weight effect was not important when the attractive interaction parameter was sufficiently strong. In PVPy/copolymer blends, microphase separation was also prevalent, but phase separation in PnBA/copolymer blends seemed to follow the macro−micro mechanism. In blends of the diblock copolymer with poly(vinyl methyl ether), which was miscible with both blocks, the latter acted as a polymeric solvent for the copolymer and gave a single-phase mixture when present in sufficient amount. The addition of the block copolymer reduced the domain size in PS/poly(ethyloxazoline) blends. In PS/poly(methyl methacrylate) and PS/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) blends, the morphology changed to a cocontinuous pattern upon incorporation of the copolymer.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Organic polymers</subject><subject>Physicochemistry of polymers</subject><subject>Properties and characterization</subject><subject>Thermal and thermodynamic properties</subject><issn>0024-9297</issn><issn>1520-5835</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_8EeFOwhmu9sjrZUqxasWEG8hGya4Lbb3ZKs0P33bl3tydMM8z7z8Q4A5xhdY0TwzdooiSTl2wPQw5wgyFPKD0EPIcKgIkoeg5MYlwhhzBntgfEwL01oElMukrkLP_mwcOUiJpVPZlXRxLoJrnQwKyq7grvK1QZ-NotQbf-0wSk48qaI7uw39sHb3Xg-msDp8_3D6HYKDVWohhZnTGTcIEeIxchTmUmeOWsyjw3hhCmaMeKEVUJ6SoVMUyc98lJ4lgqpaB8Murk2VDEG5_Um5Ov2Zo2R3vnXe_8te9GxGxOtKXwwpc3jvoEgiQmnLQY7LI-12-5lE1ZaSCq5ns9e9Qt-f2KTR6E_Wv6y442Nell9tS8r4j_rvwFHY3Vp</recordid><startdate>19971117</startdate><enddate>19971117</enddate><creator>Zhao, J. Q</creator><creator>Pearce, E. M</creator><creator>Kwei, T. K</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971117</creationdate><title>Binary and Ternary Blends of Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)</title><author>Zhao, J. Q ; Pearce, E. M ; Kwei, T. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Organic polymers</topic><topic>Physicochemistry of polymers</topic><topic>Properties and characterization</topic><topic>Thermal and thermodynamic properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, J. Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwei, T. K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Macromolecules</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, J. Q</au><au>Pearce, E. M</au><au>Kwei, T. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Binary and Ternary Blends of Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)</atitle><jtitle>Macromolecules</jtitle><addtitle>Macromolecules</addtitle><date>1997-11-17</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>7119</spage><epage>7126</epage><pages>7119-7126</pages><issn>0024-9297</issn><eissn>1520-5835</eissn><coden>MAMOBX</coden><abstract>Binary and ternary blends of polystyrene-block-poly(p-hydroxystyrene) (MW = 1 × 104−1 × 104) with various homopolymers were studied. In binary blends, in which the homopolymers poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(p-vinylpyridine) (PVPy), and poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) had attractive interactions via hydrogen-bonding with the poly(p-hydroxystyrene) block but were immiscible with the polystyrene block, microphase separation played a dominant role in morphology development. The attractive interaction parameter appeared to be the major factor that influenced the phase separation mechanism. The results obtained with three different molecular weights of PEO suggested that the molecular weight effect was not important when the attractive interaction parameter was sufficiently strong. In PVPy/copolymer blends, microphase separation was also prevalent, but phase separation in PnBA/copolymer blends seemed to follow the macro−micro mechanism. In blends of the diblock copolymer with poly(vinyl methyl ether), which was miscible with both blocks, the latter acted as a polymeric solvent for the copolymer and gave a single-phase mixture when present in sufficient amount. The addition of the block copolymer reduced the domain size in PS/poly(ethyloxazoline) blends. In PS/poly(methyl methacrylate) and PS/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) blends, the morphology changed to a cocontinuous pattern upon incorporation of the copolymer.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ma970735x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-9297
ispartof Macromolecules, 1997-11, Vol.30 (23), p.7119-7126
issn 0024-9297
1520-5835
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_ma970735x
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Applied sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Organic polymers
Physicochemistry of polymers
Properties and characterization
Thermal and thermodynamic properties
title Binary and Ternary Blends of Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A40%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Binary%20and%20Ternary%20Blends%20of%20Polystyrene-block-Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)&rft.jtitle=Macromolecules&rft.au=Zhao,%20J.%20Q&rft.date=1997-11-17&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=7119&rft.epage=7126&rft.pages=7119-7126&rft.issn=0024-9297&rft.eissn=1520-5835&rft.coden=MAMOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ma970735x&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Eb067705206%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a390t-c1b46b5a0e22c10f37b75becabf1a252493b42e6c967f336788e7f0f76f486793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true