Loading…

Is interannual fluctuation of atmospheric CO 2 dominated by combined effects of ENSO and volcanic aerosols?

The influence of ENSO, volcanic eruptions, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on fluctuations of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration were globally investigated on the ENSO timescale for the period 1958 to 1994. Two deseasonalized and detrended monthly time series of anomalous CO 2 fluxes were g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global biogeochemical cycles 2003-12, Vol.17 (4)
Main Authors: Reichenau, Tim G., Esser, Gerd
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Global biogeochemical cycles
container_volume 17
creator Reichenau, Tim G.
Esser, Gerd
description The influence of ENSO, volcanic eruptions, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on fluctuations of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration were globally investigated on the ENSO timescale for the period 1958 to 1994. Two deseasonalized and detrended monthly time series of anomalous CO 2 fluxes were generated: (1) modeled terrestrial biospheric CO 2 flux anomalies calculated by the High Resolution Biosphere Model (HRBM) driven by realistic temperature and precipitation data but without considering radiation effects and (2) anomalous CO 2 fluxes deduced from atmospheric measurements. While comparing the two time series, three types of periods could be distinguished: “a” periods with a phase shift close to zero between the two series, “b” periods with a phase shift of up to 11 months, and “c” periods with the two curves completely out of phase. During the “c” periods the modeled data show carbon release by the biosphere while the observed data show carbon uptake. The periods of type “c” are accompanied by major volcanic eruptions with considerable aerosol production. Enhanced atmospheric aerosol loading can increase the diffuse fraction of the solar radiation. Diffuse radiation in many cases penetrates better into plant canopies thus potentially enhancing photosynthesis. The resulting additional uptake of carbon may have overcompensated the carbon release caused by ENSO effects thus possibly bringing about a net uptake of CO 2 . The length variations of the time lags (“b” periods) may be attributed to impacts of vegetation fires. The influence of the NAO remained unclear.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2002GB002025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2002GB002025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1029_2002GB002025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtOwzAYhC0EEqGw4wA-AIHfjp8rBFEplSq6KPvI8UMEEruKU6TenlSwYDMzm29GGoRuCdwToPqBAtDV8yxA-RkqiGas1JSyc1SAUqIUtBKX6CrnTwDCONcF-lpn3MXJjybGg-lx6A92OpipSxGngM00pLz_8GNncb3FFLs0dNFM3uH2iG0a2i7O2Yfg7ZRPxPJtt8UmOvydemvizBk_ppz6_HiNLoLps7_58wXavSzf69dys12t66dNaRXw0lErpKVMKyKhEgRkqwVXLWNOhmC9Aisr4gSvlG69Z_M2lYa5EEByI6sFuvtttfNsHn1o9mM3mPHYEGhONzX_b6p-AO0JWpM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is interannual fluctuation of atmospheric CO 2 dominated by combined effects of ENSO and volcanic aerosols?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Reichenau, Tim G. ; Esser, Gerd</creator><creatorcontrib>Reichenau, Tim G. ; Esser, Gerd</creatorcontrib><description>The influence of ENSO, volcanic eruptions, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on fluctuations of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration were globally investigated on the ENSO timescale for the period 1958 to 1994. Two deseasonalized and detrended monthly time series of anomalous CO 2 fluxes were generated: (1) modeled terrestrial biospheric CO 2 flux anomalies calculated by the High Resolution Biosphere Model (HRBM) driven by realistic temperature and precipitation data but without considering radiation effects and (2) anomalous CO 2 fluxes deduced from atmospheric measurements. While comparing the two time series, three types of periods could be distinguished: “a” periods with a phase shift close to zero between the two series, “b” periods with a phase shift of up to 11 months, and “c” periods with the two curves completely out of phase. During the “c” periods the modeled data show carbon release by the biosphere while the observed data show carbon uptake. The periods of type “c” are accompanied by major volcanic eruptions with considerable aerosol production. Enhanced atmospheric aerosol loading can increase the diffuse fraction of the solar radiation. Diffuse radiation in many cases penetrates better into plant canopies thus potentially enhancing photosynthesis. The resulting additional uptake of carbon may have overcompensated the carbon release caused by ENSO effects thus possibly bringing about a net uptake of CO 2 . The length variations of the time lags (“b” periods) may be attributed to impacts of vegetation fires. The influence of the NAO remained unclear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-6236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2002GB002025</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Global biogeochemical cycles, 2003-12, Vol.17 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reichenau, Tim G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Gerd</creatorcontrib><title>Is interannual fluctuation of atmospheric CO 2 dominated by combined effects of ENSO and volcanic aerosols?</title><title>Global biogeochemical cycles</title><description>The influence of ENSO, volcanic eruptions, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on fluctuations of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration were globally investigated on the ENSO timescale for the period 1958 to 1994. Two deseasonalized and detrended monthly time series of anomalous CO 2 fluxes were generated: (1) modeled terrestrial biospheric CO 2 flux anomalies calculated by the High Resolution Biosphere Model (HRBM) driven by realistic temperature and precipitation data but without considering radiation effects and (2) anomalous CO 2 fluxes deduced from atmospheric measurements. While comparing the two time series, three types of periods could be distinguished: “a” periods with a phase shift close to zero between the two series, “b” periods with a phase shift of up to 11 months, and “c” periods with the two curves completely out of phase. During the “c” periods the modeled data show carbon release by the biosphere while the observed data show carbon uptake. The periods of type “c” are accompanied by major volcanic eruptions with considerable aerosol production. Enhanced atmospheric aerosol loading can increase the diffuse fraction of the solar radiation. Diffuse radiation in many cases penetrates better into plant canopies thus potentially enhancing photosynthesis. The resulting additional uptake of carbon may have overcompensated the carbon release caused by ENSO effects thus possibly bringing about a net uptake of CO 2 . The length variations of the time lags (“b” periods) may be attributed to impacts of vegetation fires. The influence of the NAO remained unclear.</description><issn>0886-6236</issn><issn>1944-9224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEtOwzAYhC0EEqGw4wA-AIHfjp8rBFEplSq6KPvI8UMEEruKU6TenlSwYDMzm29GGoRuCdwToPqBAtDV8yxA-RkqiGas1JSyc1SAUqIUtBKX6CrnTwDCONcF-lpn3MXJjybGg-lx6A92OpipSxGngM00pLz_8GNncb3FFLs0dNFM3uH2iG0a2i7O2Yfg7ZRPxPJtt8UmOvydemvizBk_ppz6_HiNLoLps7_58wXavSzf69dys12t66dNaRXw0lErpKVMKyKhEgRkqwVXLWNOhmC9Aisr4gSvlG69Z_M2lYa5EEByI6sFuvtttfNsHn1o9mM3mPHYEGhONzX_b6p-AO0JWpM</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Reichenau, Tim G.</creator><creator>Esser, Gerd</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Is interannual fluctuation of atmospheric CO 2 dominated by combined effects of ENSO and volcanic aerosols?</title><author>Reichenau, Tim G. ; Esser, Gerd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reichenau, Tim G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Gerd</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reichenau, Tim G.</au><au>Esser, Gerd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is interannual fluctuation of atmospheric CO 2 dominated by combined effects of ENSO and volcanic aerosols?</atitle><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>0886-6236</issn><eissn>1944-9224</eissn><abstract>The influence of ENSO, volcanic eruptions, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on fluctuations of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration were globally investigated on the ENSO timescale for the period 1958 to 1994. Two deseasonalized and detrended monthly time series of anomalous CO 2 fluxes were generated: (1) modeled terrestrial biospheric CO 2 flux anomalies calculated by the High Resolution Biosphere Model (HRBM) driven by realistic temperature and precipitation data but without considering radiation effects and (2) anomalous CO 2 fluxes deduced from atmospheric measurements. While comparing the two time series, three types of periods could be distinguished: “a” periods with a phase shift close to zero between the two series, “b” periods with a phase shift of up to 11 months, and “c” periods with the two curves completely out of phase. During the “c” periods the modeled data show carbon release by the biosphere while the observed data show carbon uptake. The periods of type “c” are accompanied by major volcanic eruptions with considerable aerosol production. Enhanced atmospheric aerosol loading can increase the diffuse fraction of the solar radiation. Diffuse radiation in many cases penetrates better into plant canopies thus potentially enhancing photosynthesis. The resulting additional uptake of carbon may have overcompensated the carbon release caused by ENSO effects thus possibly bringing about a net uptake of CO 2 . The length variations of the time lags (“b” periods) may be attributed to impacts of vegetation fires. The influence of the NAO remained unclear.</abstract><doi>10.1029/2002GB002025</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-6236
ispartof Global biogeochemical cycles, 2003-12, Vol.17 (4)
issn 0886-6236
1944-9224
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2002GB002025
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title Is interannual fluctuation of atmospheric CO 2 dominated by combined effects of ENSO and volcanic aerosols?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20interannual%20fluctuation%20of%20atmospheric%20CO%202%20dominated%20by%20combined%20effects%20of%20ENSO%20and%20volcanic%20aerosols?&rft.jtitle=Global%20biogeochemical%20cycles&rft.au=Reichenau,%20Tim%20G.&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=0886-6236&rft.eissn=1944-9224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2002GB002025&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1029_2002GB002025%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c805-d2c67c249817036107b9658b44d7ffce80c731d65389bee4eff27a4dff075a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true