Loading…

Discerning Changes in High‐Frequency Climate Variability Using Geochemical Populations of Individual Foraminifera

Individual foraminiferal analysis (IFA) has proven to be a useful tool in reconstructing the amplitude of high‐frequency climate signals such as the annual cycle and the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). However, using IFA to evaluate past changes in climate variability is complicated by many fac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleoceanography and paleoclimatology 2021-02, Vol.36 (2), p.n/a
Main Authors: Glaubke, Ryan H., Thirumalai, Kaustubh, Schmidt, Matthew W., Hertzberg, Jennifer E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Individual foraminiferal analysis (IFA) has proven to be a useful tool in reconstructing the amplitude of high‐frequency climate signals such as the annual cycle and the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). However, using IFA to evaluate past changes in climate variability is complicated by many factors including geographic location, foraminiferal ecology, methods of sample processing, and the influence of multiple, superimposed high‐frequency climate signals. Robust statistical tools and rigorous uncertainty analysis are therefore required to ensure the reliability of IFA‐based interpretations of paleoclimatic change. Here, we present a new proxy system model—called the Quantile Analysis of Temperature using Individual Foraminiferal Analyses (QUANTIFA)—that combines methods for assessing IFA detection sensitivity with analytical tools for processing and interpreting IFA data to standardize and streamline reconstructions employing IFA‐Mg/Ca measurements. Model exercises with simulated and real IFA data demonstrate that the dominant signal retained by IFA populations is largely determined by the annual‐to‐interannual ratio of climate variability at a given location and depth and can be impacted by seasonal biases in foraminiferal productivity. In addition, our exercises reveal that extreme quantiles can be reliable indicators of past changes in climate variability, are often more sensitive to climate change than quantiles within the distributional interior, and can be used to distinguish changes in interannual phenomena like ENSO from seasonality. Altogether, QUANTIFA provides a useful tool for modeling IFA uncertainties and processing IFA data that can be leveraged to establish a history of past climate variability. Plain Language Summary The chemistry of fossil shells formed by marine protists called “foraminifera” has been a valuable tool for reconstructing long‐term trends in past climate change. However, establishing a history of important climate phenomena that occur on timescales more relevant to humans, like the strength of the seasonal cycle or the intensity of El Niño events, is much more difficult to achieve. Recently, researchers have begun to address these questions by analyzing individual foraminiferal shells through a technique called individual foraminiferal analysis (IFA). Populations of these individually analyzed shells give us a snapshot of how variable Earth's climate was in the past. However, comparing estimates of climate variability
ISSN:2572-4517
2572-4525
DOI:10.1029/2020PA004065