Loading…

Variability of Atmospheric CO 2 Over the Arctic Ocean: Insights From the O‐Buoy Chemical Observing Network

As the Arctic climate rapidly warms, there is a critical need for understanding variability and change in the Arctic carbon cycle, but sparse spatial coverage of observations has hindered progress. This work analyzes measurements of atmospheric CO 2 in the Arctic from long‐term on‐ice measurements (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2023-03, Vol.128 (6)
Main Authors: Graham, K. A., Holmes, C. D., Friedrich, G., Rauschenberg, C. D., Williams, C. R., Bottenheim, J. W., Chavez, F. P., Halfacre, J. W., Perovich, D. K., Shepson, P. B., Simpson, W. R., Matrai, P. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 128
creator Graham, K. A.
Holmes, C. D.
Friedrich, G.
Rauschenberg, C. D.
Williams, C. R.
Bottenheim, J. W.
Chavez, F. P.
Halfacre, J. W.
Perovich, D. K.
Shepson, P. B.
Simpson, W. R.
Matrai, P. A.
description As the Arctic climate rapidly warms, there is a critical need for understanding variability and change in the Arctic carbon cycle, but sparse spatial coverage of observations has hindered progress. This work analyzes measurements of atmospheric CO 2 in the Arctic from long‐term on‐ice measurements (the O‐Buoy Network), as well as coastal observatories from 2009 to 2016. The on‐ice measurements showed smaller seasonal amplitudes than coastal observatories, in contrast to the general observation of poleward increases of seasonal cycle amplitude. Average on‐ice measurements were also lower than their coastal counterparts during winter and spring, contradicting the expectation that CO 2 increases poleward in boreal winter. We compared the observations to CO 2 simulated in an updated version of GEOS‐Chem 3‐D chemical transport model, which includes new tracers of airmass history and CO 2 sources and sinks. The model reproduced the observed features of the seasonal cycle and showed that terrestrial biosphere fluxes and synoptic transport explain most CO 2 variability (both synoptic and interannual) over the Arctic Ocean surface. The polar airmass partially isolates the Arctic Ocean surface air from terrestrial CO 2 exchange, which explains the reduced seasonal cycle amplitude and winter maxima. All Arctic coastal sites had similar CO 2 interannual variability, particularly in summer, which was largely reproduced by the model. The interannual variability observed over sea ice, however, was distinct from the coastal sites and not reproduced by the model. Air‐sea CO 2 exchange in and around sea ice, which was once thought to be negligible, may be an important driver of interannual variability over the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic is undergoing immense biogeochemical change, due to rapid warming in recent decades. These rapid changes contribute to uncertainty in the Arctic carbon cycle and the physical processes impacting carbon fluxes at these latitudes. In this work, we analyzed and modeled atmospheric CO 2 concentrations obtained over Arctic sea ice and compared them with CO 2 concentrations measured at coastal observatories. We found that CO 2 concentrations over sea ice do not follow the general observed behavior that seasonal cycle amplitudes of CO 2 (dominated by photosynthesis and respiration of the terrestrial biosphere) are increasing poleward as our global climate continues to warm. We also found that the interannual growth of CO 2 is different between the co
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022JD036437
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JD036437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1029_2022JD036437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUElOwzAAtBBIVKU3HuAHEHCcxTa3ECgUVeRSIW6R18aQ1JUdWuXGE3gjLyEsQsxhZjQjzWEAOI3ReYwwu8AI4_trlORpQg7ABMc5iyhj-eGfJ0_HYBbCMxpBUZJm6QS0j9xbLmxr-wE6A4u-c2HbaG8lLCuIYbXTHvaNhoWX_RhWUvPNJVxsgl03fYBz77rvvvp4e796dQMsG91ZyVtYiaD9zm7W8EH3e-dfTsCR4W3Qs1-dgtX8ZlXeRcvqdlEWy0hSRCKWSRVTrfHIqWJICqKoNGNiMsWz1CRcZBQrIYhQeUqxkQJTojLMCeOMJlNw9jMrvQvBa1Nvve24H-oY1V9f1f-_Sj4BGLVdhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability of Atmospheric CO 2 Over the Arctic Ocean: Insights From the O‐Buoy Chemical Observing Network</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Graham, K. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Friedrich, G. ; Rauschenberg, C. D. ; Williams, C. R. ; Bottenheim, J. W. ; Chavez, F. P. ; Halfacre, J. W. ; Perovich, D. K. ; Shepson, P. B. ; Simpson, W. R. ; Matrai, P. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, K. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Friedrich, G. ; Rauschenberg, C. D. ; Williams, C. R. ; Bottenheim, J. W. ; Chavez, F. P. ; Halfacre, J. W. ; Perovich, D. K. ; Shepson, P. B. ; Simpson, W. R. ; Matrai, P. A.</creatorcontrib><description>As the Arctic climate rapidly warms, there is a critical need for understanding variability and change in the Arctic carbon cycle, but sparse spatial coverage of observations has hindered progress. This work analyzes measurements of atmospheric CO 2 in the Arctic from long‐term on‐ice measurements (the O‐Buoy Network), as well as coastal observatories from 2009 to 2016. The on‐ice measurements showed smaller seasonal amplitudes than coastal observatories, in contrast to the general observation of poleward increases of seasonal cycle amplitude. Average on‐ice measurements were also lower than their coastal counterparts during winter and spring, contradicting the expectation that CO 2 increases poleward in boreal winter. We compared the observations to CO 2 simulated in an updated version of GEOS‐Chem 3‐D chemical transport model, which includes new tracers of airmass history and CO 2 sources and sinks. The model reproduced the observed features of the seasonal cycle and showed that terrestrial biosphere fluxes and synoptic transport explain most CO 2 variability (both synoptic and interannual) over the Arctic Ocean surface. The polar airmass partially isolates the Arctic Ocean surface air from terrestrial CO 2 exchange, which explains the reduced seasonal cycle amplitude and winter maxima. All Arctic coastal sites had similar CO 2 interannual variability, particularly in summer, which was largely reproduced by the model. The interannual variability observed over sea ice, however, was distinct from the coastal sites and not reproduced by the model. Air‐sea CO 2 exchange in and around sea ice, which was once thought to be negligible, may be an important driver of interannual variability over the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic is undergoing immense biogeochemical change, due to rapid warming in recent decades. These rapid changes contribute to uncertainty in the Arctic carbon cycle and the physical processes impacting carbon fluxes at these latitudes. In this work, we analyzed and modeled atmospheric CO 2 concentrations obtained over Arctic sea ice and compared them with CO 2 concentrations measured at coastal observatories. We found that CO 2 concentrations over sea ice do not follow the general observed behavior that seasonal cycle amplitudes of CO 2 (dominated by photosynthesis and respiration of the terrestrial biosphere) are increasing poleward as our global climate continues to warm. We also found that the interannual growth of CO 2 is different between the coast and over sea ice. Our findings suggest that another physical process (likely gas exchange in and around sea ice) may be impacting atmospheric CO 2 concentrations year‐to‐year at the highest latitudes and obtaining more observations over sea ice will add to knowledge of this sparsely observed region. Atmospheric CO 2 mixing ratio observations over Arctic Ocean sea ice are examined and interpreted using a chemical transport model Seasonal cycle amplitudes of atmospheric CO 2 are smaller, on average, over sea ice than at their coastal counterparts Gas exchange in and around sea ice likely influences the spatial gradients and interannual variability of CO 2 over Arctic sea ice</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022JD036437</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2023-03, Vol.128 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1656-5519 ; 0000-0002-0576-0864 ; 0000-0003-2679-3558 ; 0000-0002-0691-292X ; 0000-0002-2727-0954 ; 0000-0002-8596-7290</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauschenberg, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheim, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavez, F. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halfacre, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perovich, D. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepson, P. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matrai, P. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability of Atmospheric CO 2 Over the Arctic Ocean: Insights From the O‐Buoy Chemical Observing Network</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>As the Arctic climate rapidly warms, there is a critical need for understanding variability and change in the Arctic carbon cycle, but sparse spatial coverage of observations has hindered progress. This work analyzes measurements of atmospheric CO 2 in the Arctic from long‐term on‐ice measurements (the O‐Buoy Network), as well as coastal observatories from 2009 to 2016. The on‐ice measurements showed smaller seasonal amplitudes than coastal observatories, in contrast to the general observation of poleward increases of seasonal cycle amplitude. Average on‐ice measurements were also lower than their coastal counterparts during winter and spring, contradicting the expectation that CO 2 increases poleward in boreal winter. We compared the observations to CO 2 simulated in an updated version of GEOS‐Chem 3‐D chemical transport model, which includes new tracers of airmass history and CO 2 sources and sinks. The model reproduced the observed features of the seasonal cycle and showed that terrestrial biosphere fluxes and synoptic transport explain most CO 2 variability (both synoptic and interannual) over the Arctic Ocean surface. The polar airmass partially isolates the Arctic Ocean surface air from terrestrial CO 2 exchange, which explains the reduced seasonal cycle amplitude and winter maxima. All Arctic coastal sites had similar CO 2 interannual variability, particularly in summer, which was largely reproduced by the model. The interannual variability observed over sea ice, however, was distinct from the coastal sites and not reproduced by the model. Air‐sea CO 2 exchange in and around sea ice, which was once thought to be negligible, may be an important driver of interannual variability over the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic is undergoing immense biogeochemical change, due to rapid warming in recent decades. These rapid changes contribute to uncertainty in the Arctic carbon cycle and the physical processes impacting carbon fluxes at these latitudes. In this work, we analyzed and modeled atmospheric CO 2 concentrations obtained over Arctic sea ice and compared them with CO 2 concentrations measured at coastal observatories. We found that CO 2 concentrations over sea ice do not follow the general observed behavior that seasonal cycle amplitudes of CO 2 (dominated by photosynthesis and respiration of the terrestrial biosphere) are increasing poleward as our global climate continues to warm. We also found that the interannual growth of CO 2 is different between the coast and over sea ice. Our findings suggest that another physical process (likely gas exchange in and around sea ice) may be impacting atmospheric CO 2 concentrations year‐to‐year at the highest latitudes and obtaining more observations over sea ice will add to knowledge of this sparsely observed region. Atmospheric CO 2 mixing ratio observations over Arctic Ocean sea ice are examined and interpreted using a chemical transport model Seasonal cycle amplitudes of atmospheric CO 2 are smaller, on average, over sea ice than at their coastal counterparts Gas exchange in and around sea ice likely influences the spatial gradients and interannual variability of CO 2 over Arctic sea ice</description><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUElOwzAAtBBIVKU3HuAHEHCcxTa3ECgUVeRSIW6R18aQ1JUdWuXGE3gjLyEsQsxhZjQjzWEAOI3ReYwwu8AI4_trlORpQg7ABMc5iyhj-eGfJ0_HYBbCMxpBUZJm6QS0j9xbLmxr-wE6A4u-c2HbaG8lLCuIYbXTHvaNhoWX_RhWUvPNJVxsgl03fYBz77rvvvp4e796dQMsG91ZyVtYiaD9zm7W8EH3e-dfTsCR4W3Qs1-dgtX8ZlXeRcvqdlEWy0hSRCKWSRVTrfHIqWJICqKoNGNiMsWz1CRcZBQrIYhQeUqxkQJTojLMCeOMJlNw9jMrvQvBa1Nvve24H-oY1V9f1f-_Sj4BGLVdhQ</recordid><startdate>20230327</startdate><enddate>20230327</enddate><creator>Graham, K. A.</creator><creator>Holmes, C. D.</creator><creator>Friedrich, G.</creator><creator>Rauschenberg, C. D.</creator><creator>Williams, C. R.</creator><creator>Bottenheim, J. W.</creator><creator>Chavez, F. P.</creator><creator>Halfacre, J. W.</creator><creator>Perovich, D. K.</creator><creator>Shepson, P. B.</creator><creator>Simpson, W. R.</creator><creator>Matrai, P. A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-5519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-0864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-3558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-292X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8596-7290</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230327</creationdate><title>Variability of Atmospheric CO 2 Over the Arctic Ocean: Insights From the O‐Buoy Chemical Observing Network</title><author>Graham, K. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Friedrich, G. ; Rauschenberg, C. D. ; Williams, C. R. ; Bottenheim, J. W. ; Chavez, F. P. ; Halfacre, J. W. ; Perovich, D. K. ; Shepson, P. B. ; Simpson, W. R. ; Matrai, P. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauschenberg, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheim, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavez, F. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halfacre, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perovich, D. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepson, P. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matrai, P. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, K. A.</au><au>Holmes, C. D.</au><au>Friedrich, G.</au><au>Rauschenberg, C. D.</au><au>Williams, C. R.</au><au>Bottenheim, J. W.</au><au>Chavez, F. P.</au><au>Halfacre, J. W.</au><au>Perovich, D. K.</au><au>Shepson, P. B.</au><au>Simpson, W. R.</au><au>Matrai, P. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability of Atmospheric CO 2 Over the Arctic Ocean: Insights From the O‐Buoy Chemical Observing Network</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2023-03-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>As the Arctic climate rapidly warms, there is a critical need for understanding variability and change in the Arctic carbon cycle, but sparse spatial coverage of observations has hindered progress. This work analyzes measurements of atmospheric CO 2 in the Arctic from long‐term on‐ice measurements (the O‐Buoy Network), as well as coastal observatories from 2009 to 2016. The on‐ice measurements showed smaller seasonal amplitudes than coastal observatories, in contrast to the general observation of poleward increases of seasonal cycle amplitude. Average on‐ice measurements were also lower than their coastal counterparts during winter and spring, contradicting the expectation that CO 2 increases poleward in boreal winter. We compared the observations to CO 2 simulated in an updated version of GEOS‐Chem 3‐D chemical transport model, which includes new tracers of airmass history and CO 2 sources and sinks. The model reproduced the observed features of the seasonal cycle and showed that terrestrial biosphere fluxes and synoptic transport explain most CO 2 variability (both synoptic and interannual) over the Arctic Ocean surface. The polar airmass partially isolates the Arctic Ocean surface air from terrestrial CO 2 exchange, which explains the reduced seasonal cycle amplitude and winter maxima. All Arctic coastal sites had similar CO 2 interannual variability, particularly in summer, which was largely reproduced by the model. The interannual variability observed over sea ice, however, was distinct from the coastal sites and not reproduced by the model. Air‐sea CO 2 exchange in and around sea ice, which was once thought to be negligible, may be an important driver of interannual variability over the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic is undergoing immense biogeochemical change, due to rapid warming in recent decades. These rapid changes contribute to uncertainty in the Arctic carbon cycle and the physical processes impacting carbon fluxes at these latitudes. In this work, we analyzed and modeled atmospheric CO 2 concentrations obtained over Arctic sea ice and compared them with CO 2 concentrations measured at coastal observatories. We found that CO 2 concentrations over sea ice do not follow the general observed behavior that seasonal cycle amplitudes of CO 2 (dominated by photosynthesis and respiration of the terrestrial biosphere) are increasing poleward as our global climate continues to warm. We also found that the interannual growth of CO 2 is different between the coast and over sea ice. Our findings suggest that another physical process (likely gas exchange in and around sea ice) may be impacting atmospheric CO 2 concentrations year‐to‐year at the highest latitudes and obtaining more observations over sea ice will add to knowledge of this sparsely observed region. Atmospheric CO 2 mixing ratio observations over Arctic Ocean sea ice are examined and interpreted using a chemical transport model Seasonal cycle amplitudes of atmospheric CO 2 are smaller, on average, over sea ice than at their coastal counterparts Gas exchange in and around sea ice likely influences the spatial gradients and interannual variability of CO 2 over Arctic sea ice</abstract><doi>10.1029/2022JD036437</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-5519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-0864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-3558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-292X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8596-7290</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2023-03, Vol.128 (6)
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JD036437
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Variability of Atmospheric CO 2 Over the Arctic Ocean: Insights From the O‐Buoy Chemical Observing Network
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A19%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20of%20Atmospheric%20CO%202%20Over%20the%20Arctic%20Ocean:%20Insights%20From%20the%20O%E2%80%90Buoy%20Chemical%20Observing%20Network&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Graham,%20K.%20A.&rft.date=2023-03-27&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022JD036437&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1029_2022JD036437%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c807-95cd18ee2d184d90cb7d8cf8eef5da54f3ab582dbb7bd6482fcb287d52a79a983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true