Loading…

Magnetic blocking temperatures of magnetite calculated with a three-dimensional micromagnetic model

We present an analysis of thermal stability of magnetic remanence in fine grains of magnetite (grain size d = 15–120 nm). In order to model incoherent transitions between single‐domain (SD) and pseudo‐single‐domain (PSD) magnetization configurations, we employ a three‐dimensional constrained minimiz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 1997-10, Vol.102 (B10), p.22695-22709
Main Authors: Winklhofer, Michael, Fabian, Karl, Heider, Franz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present an analysis of thermal stability of magnetic remanence in fine grains of magnetite (grain size d = 15–120 nm). In order to model incoherent transitions between single‐domain (SD) and pseudo‐single‐domain (PSD) magnetization configurations, we employ a three‐dimensional constrained minimization method proposed by Enkin and Williams [1994]. Using this approach, one can track in detail the transition from one local energy minimum state into another by constraining the magnetization vectors of appropriate cells in a discrete model. For each particle, we obtain the energy barriers EB(T) from 25° to 578°C. Magnetic blocking temperatures (TB) are calculated by integrating EB(T) for two extreme cooling schedules representing laboratory and geological timescales. The computed blocking temperatures for laboratory timescales are in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined blocking temperatures for magnetite by Dunlop [1973b]. The results of our computations are summarized as relaxation time versus blocking temperature curves, which deviate from the curves of Pullaiah et al. [1975] for particles with grain sizes in the SD‐PSD transition region. A consequence of the dependence of TB on timescale is that some PSD size particles are blocked in vortex states on geologic timescales but are blocked in the SD state on laboratory timescales. Paleointensity determinations with the Thellier method on such samples can therefore underestimate the paleofield. The superparamagnetic to SD threshold size dS is determined as 50 nm for cubic grains, whereas a small aspect ratio of q=1.1 is sufficient to depress dS to 27 nm. SD particles of magnetite with small shape anisotropy and cubic grains with 58 nm≤d≤72 nm are reliable carriers of paleomagnetic information.
ISSN:0148-0227
2156-2202
DOI:10.1029/97JB01730