Loading…
Good news for CB 1 receptors: endogenous agonists are in the right place
Endocannabinoids are endogenous ligands of brain‐type (CB 1 ) and spleen‐type (CB 2 ) cannabinoid receptors. N ‐Arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, AEA) and 2‐arachidonoylglycerol (2‐AG) are prototype members of the fatty acid amides and the monoacylglycerols, two groups of endocannabinoids. Unlik...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of pharmacology 2009-01, Vol.153 (2), p.179-181 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Endocannabinoids are endogenous ligands of brain‐type (CB
1
) and spleen‐type (CB
2
) cannabinoid receptors.
N
‐Arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, AEA) and 2‐arachidonoylglycerol (2‐AG) are prototype members of the fatty acid amides and the monoacylglycerols, two groups of endocannabinoids. Unlike CB
1
, CB
2
receptors do not reside within ‘caveolae’, specialized membrane microdomains that are well‐known modulators of the activity of a number of G protein‐coupled receptors. In this issue of the
British Journal of Pharmacology
, Rimmerman and coworkers demonstrate that 2‐AG is entirely localized in the caveolae of dorsal root ganglion cells, where also part of AEA (∼30%) can be detected. However, most of AEA (∼70%) was detected in non‐caveolae fractions, that is where CB
2
receptors are localized. The different interaction of AEA and 2‐AG with membrane microdomains might have significant implications for endocannabinoid‐dependent autocrine and/or retrograde‐paracrine signalling pathways. It also raises an important question about the structural determinants responsible for a different localization of two apparently similar endocannabinoids within lipid bilayers.
British Journal of Pharmacology
(2008)
153
, 179–181; doi:
10.1038/sj.bjp.0707566
; published online 12 November 2007 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1188 1476-5381 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707566 |