Loading…
Measuring mechanical cues for modeling the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures
A breast-cancer tumor develops within a stroma, a tissue where a complex extracellular matrix surrounds cells, mediating the cancer progression through biomechanical and -chemical cues. Current materials partially mimic the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures but methods for measuring the mechanical...
Saved in:
Published in: | Soft matter 2024-04, Vol.2 (16), p.3483-3498 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-b0b1a93109aed8b25cdaa97fd4282190aa733e3a4a95b105418d1a929bd3b8193 |
container_end_page | 3498 |
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 3483 |
container_title | Soft matter |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Srbova, Linda Arasalo, Ossi Lehtonen, Arttu J Pokki, Juho |
description | A breast-cancer tumor develops within a stroma, a tissue where a complex extracellular matrix surrounds cells, mediating the cancer progression through biomechanical and -chemical cues. Current materials partially mimic the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures but methods for measuring the mechanical properties of the matrix at cell-relevant-length scales and stromal-stiffness levels are lacking. Here, to address this gap, we developed a characterization approach that employs probe-based microrheometry and Bayesian modeling to quantify length-scale-dependent mechanics and mechanical heterogeneity as in the stromal matrix. We examined the interpenetrating network (IPN) composed of alginate scaffolds (for adjusting mechanics) and type-1 collagen (a stromal-matrix constituent). We analyzed viscoelasticity: absolute-shear moduli (stiffness/elasticity) and phase angles (viscous and elastic characteristics). We determined the relationship between microrheometry and rheometry information. Microrheometry reveals lower stiffness at cell-relevant scales, compared to macroscale rheometry, with dependency on the length scale (10 to 100 μm). These data show increasing IPN stiffness with crosslinking until saturation ( 15 mM of Ca
2+
). Furthermore, we report that IPN stiffness can be adjusted by modulating collagen concentration and interconnectivity (by polymerization temperature). The IPNs are heterogeneous structurally (in SEM) and mechanically. Interestingly, increased alginate crosslinking changes IPN heterogeneity in stiffness but not in phase angle, until the saturation. In contrast, such changes are undetectable in alginate scaffolds. Our nonlinear viscoelasticity analysis at tumor-cell-exerted strains shows that only the softer IPNs stiffen with strain, like the stromal-collagen constituent. In summary, our approach can quantify the stromal-matrix-related viscoelasticity and is likely applicable to other materials in 3D culture.
An approach to quantify microscale viscoelasticity in breast-cancer-associated stromal tissues was developed for cell-scale analyses of physiologically stiff 3D cell cultures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d3sm01425h |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1039_D3SM01425H</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3034776073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-b0b1a93109aed8b25cdaa97fd4282190aa733e3a4a95b105418d1a929bd3b8193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFLwzAUxoMobk4v3pWAFxGmSV_aJkfZ1AkbHlTwVtIkdR1NO5MW9L83dXOCp_fg-72Pj-8hdErJNSUgbjR4SyiL4uUeGtKUsXHCGd_f7fA2QEferwgBzmhyiAbAY54mMR-ixcJI37myfsfWqKWsSyUrrDrjcdE4bBttql5slwb71jU2qFa2rvzEZY1hipWper5qO2f8MTooZOXNyXaO0Ov93ctkNp4_PTxObudjBRC145zkVAqgREijeR7FSksp0kKziEdUEClTAAOSSRHnlMSMch0OIpFryDkVMEKXG9-1az5C1jazpe-TyNo0nc-AAEvThASbEbr4h66aztUhXaAYi0QSUxaoqw2lXOO9M0W2dqWV7iujJOtLzqbwvPgpeRbg861ll1ujd-hvqwE42wDOq5369yX4BtdTf_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3044296514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring mechanical cues for modeling the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)</source><creator>Srbova, Linda ; Arasalo, Ossi ; Lehtonen, Arttu J ; Pokki, Juho</creator><creatorcontrib>Srbova, Linda ; Arasalo, Ossi ; Lehtonen, Arttu J ; Pokki, Juho</creatorcontrib><description>A breast-cancer tumor develops within a stroma, a tissue where a complex extracellular matrix surrounds cells, mediating the cancer progression through biomechanical and -chemical cues. Current materials partially mimic the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures but methods for measuring the mechanical properties of the matrix at cell-relevant-length scales and stromal-stiffness levels are lacking. Here, to address this gap, we developed a characterization approach that employs probe-based microrheometry and Bayesian modeling to quantify length-scale-dependent mechanics and mechanical heterogeneity as in the stromal matrix. We examined the interpenetrating network (IPN) composed of alginate scaffolds (for adjusting mechanics) and type-1 collagen (a stromal-matrix constituent). We analyzed viscoelasticity: absolute-shear moduli (stiffness/elasticity) and phase angles (viscous and elastic characteristics). We determined the relationship between microrheometry and rheometry information. Microrheometry reveals lower stiffness at cell-relevant scales, compared to macroscale rheometry, with dependency on the length scale (10 to 100 μm). These data show increasing IPN stiffness with crosslinking until saturation ( 15 mM of Ca
2+
). Furthermore, we report that IPN stiffness can be adjusted by modulating collagen concentration and interconnectivity (by polymerization temperature). The IPNs are heterogeneous structurally (in SEM) and mechanically. Interestingly, increased alginate crosslinking changes IPN heterogeneity in stiffness but not in phase angle, until the saturation. In contrast, such changes are undetectable in alginate scaffolds. Our nonlinear viscoelasticity analysis at tumor-cell-exerted strains shows that only the softer IPNs stiffen with strain, like the stromal-collagen constituent. In summary, our approach can quantify the stromal-matrix-related viscoelasticity and is likely applicable to other materials in 3D culture.
An approach to quantify microscale viscoelasticity in breast-cancer-associated stromal tissues was developed for cell-scale analyses of physiologically stiff 3D cell cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-683X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6848</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d3sm01425h</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38587658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Alginates ; Alginates - chemistry ; Alginic acid ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Calcium ions ; Cancer ; Cell culture ; Cell Culture Techniques, Three Dimensional ; Chemical stimuli ; Collagen ; Collagen Type I - chemistry ; Collagen Type I - metabolism ; Constituents ; Crosslinking ; Elasticity ; Extracellular matrix ; Extracellular Matrix - chemistry ; Extracellular Matrix - metabolism ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Interpenetrating networks ; Measurement methods ; Mechanical properties ; Modelling ; Models, Biological ; Neoplasms ; Probability theory ; Rheology ; Rheometry ; Saturation ; Scaffolds ; Seaweed meal ; Shear modulus ; Stiffness ; Stroma ; Stromal Cells - cytology ; Stromal Cells - metabolism ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; Tumors ; Viscoelasticity ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Soft matter, 2024-04, Vol.2 (16), p.3483-3498</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-b0b1a93109aed8b25cdaa97fd4282190aa733e3a4a95b105418d1a929bd3b8193</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3198-7675</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38587658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Srbova, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arasalo, Ossi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Arttu J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokki, Juho</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring mechanical cues for modeling the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures</title><title>Soft matter</title><addtitle>Soft Matter</addtitle><description>A breast-cancer tumor develops within a stroma, a tissue where a complex extracellular matrix surrounds cells, mediating the cancer progression through biomechanical and -chemical cues. Current materials partially mimic the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures but methods for measuring the mechanical properties of the matrix at cell-relevant-length scales and stromal-stiffness levels are lacking. Here, to address this gap, we developed a characterization approach that employs probe-based microrheometry and Bayesian modeling to quantify length-scale-dependent mechanics and mechanical heterogeneity as in the stromal matrix. We examined the interpenetrating network (IPN) composed of alginate scaffolds (for adjusting mechanics) and type-1 collagen (a stromal-matrix constituent). We analyzed viscoelasticity: absolute-shear moduli (stiffness/elasticity) and phase angles (viscous and elastic characteristics). We determined the relationship between microrheometry and rheometry information. Microrheometry reveals lower stiffness at cell-relevant scales, compared to macroscale rheometry, with dependency on the length scale (10 to 100 μm). These data show increasing IPN stiffness with crosslinking until saturation ( 15 mM of Ca
2+
). Furthermore, we report that IPN stiffness can be adjusted by modulating collagen concentration and interconnectivity (by polymerization temperature). The IPNs are heterogeneous structurally (in SEM) and mechanically. Interestingly, increased alginate crosslinking changes IPN heterogeneity in stiffness but not in phase angle, until the saturation. In contrast, such changes are undetectable in alginate scaffolds. Our nonlinear viscoelasticity analysis at tumor-cell-exerted strains shows that only the softer IPNs stiffen with strain, like the stromal-collagen constituent. In summary, our approach can quantify the stromal-matrix-related viscoelasticity and is likely applicable to other materials in 3D culture.
An approach to quantify microscale viscoelasticity in breast-cancer-associated stromal tissues was developed for cell-scale analyses of physiologically stiff 3D cell cultures.</description><subject>Alginates</subject><subject>Alginates - chemistry</subject><subject>Alginic acid</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Calcium ions</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques, Three Dimensional</subject><subject>Chemical stimuli</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagen Type I - chemistry</subject><subject>Collagen Type I - metabolism</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Crosslinking</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - chemistry</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpenetrating networks</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Rheometry</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Seaweed meal</subject><subject>Shear modulus</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Stroma</subject><subject>Stromal Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Stromal Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Viscoelasticity</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>1744-683X</issn><issn>1744-6848</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFLwzAUxoMobk4v3pWAFxGmSV_aJkfZ1AkbHlTwVtIkdR1NO5MW9L83dXOCp_fg-72Pj-8hdErJNSUgbjR4SyiL4uUeGtKUsXHCGd_f7fA2QEferwgBzmhyiAbAY54mMR-ixcJI37myfsfWqKWsSyUrrDrjcdE4bBttql5slwb71jU2qFa2rvzEZY1hipWper5qO2f8MTooZOXNyXaO0Ov93ctkNp4_PTxObudjBRC145zkVAqgREijeR7FSksp0kKziEdUEClTAAOSSRHnlMSMch0OIpFryDkVMEKXG9-1az5C1jazpe-TyNo0nc-AAEvThASbEbr4h66aztUhXaAYi0QSUxaoqw2lXOO9M0W2dqWV7iujJOtLzqbwvPgpeRbg861ll1ujd-hvqwE42wDOq5369yX4BtdTf_M</recordid><startdate>20240424</startdate><enddate>20240424</enddate><creator>Srbova, Linda</creator><creator>Arasalo, Ossi</creator><creator>Lehtonen, Arttu J</creator><creator>Pokki, Juho</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-7675</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240424</creationdate><title>Measuring mechanical cues for modeling the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures</title><author>Srbova, Linda ; Arasalo, Ossi ; Lehtonen, Arttu J ; Pokki, Juho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-b0b1a93109aed8b25cdaa97fd4282190aa733e3a4a95b105418d1a929bd3b8193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alginates</topic><topic>Alginates - chemistry</topic><topic>Alginic acid</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Calcium ions</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques, Three Dimensional</topic><topic>Chemical stimuli</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagen Type I - chemistry</topic><topic>Collagen Type I - metabolism</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Crosslinking</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - chemistry</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpenetrating networks</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Rheometry</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Seaweed meal</topic><topic>Shear modulus</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Stroma</topic><topic>Stromal Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Stromal Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Viscoelasticity</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srbova, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arasalo, Ossi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Arttu J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokki, Juho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Soft matter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srbova, Linda</au><au>Arasalo, Ossi</au><au>Lehtonen, Arttu J</au><au>Pokki, Juho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring mechanical cues for modeling the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures</atitle><jtitle>Soft matter</jtitle><addtitle>Soft Matter</addtitle><date>2024-04-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>3483</spage><epage>3498</epage><pages>3483-3498</pages><issn>1744-683X</issn><eissn>1744-6848</eissn><abstract>A breast-cancer tumor develops within a stroma, a tissue where a complex extracellular matrix surrounds cells, mediating the cancer progression through biomechanical and -chemical cues. Current materials partially mimic the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures but methods for measuring the mechanical properties of the matrix at cell-relevant-length scales and stromal-stiffness levels are lacking. Here, to address this gap, we developed a characterization approach that employs probe-based microrheometry and Bayesian modeling to quantify length-scale-dependent mechanics and mechanical heterogeneity as in the stromal matrix. We examined the interpenetrating network (IPN) composed of alginate scaffolds (for adjusting mechanics) and type-1 collagen (a stromal-matrix constituent). We analyzed viscoelasticity: absolute-shear moduli (stiffness/elasticity) and phase angles (viscous and elastic characteristics). We determined the relationship between microrheometry and rheometry information. Microrheometry reveals lower stiffness at cell-relevant scales, compared to macroscale rheometry, with dependency on the length scale (10 to 100 μm). These data show increasing IPN stiffness with crosslinking until saturation ( 15 mM of Ca
2+
). Furthermore, we report that IPN stiffness can be adjusted by modulating collagen concentration and interconnectivity (by polymerization temperature). The IPNs are heterogeneous structurally (in SEM) and mechanically. Interestingly, increased alginate crosslinking changes IPN heterogeneity in stiffness but not in phase angle, until the saturation. In contrast, such changes are undetectable in alginate scaffolds. Our nonlinear viscoelasticity analysis at tumor-cell-exerted strains shows that only the softer IPNs stiffen with strain, like the stromal-collagen constituent. In summary, our approach can quantify the stromal-matrix-related viscoelasticity and is likely applicable to other materials in 3D culture.
An approach to quantify microscale viscoelasticity in breast-cancer-associated stromal tissues was developed for cell-scale analyses of physiologically stiff 3D cell cultures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>38587658</pmid><doi>10.1039/d3sm01425h</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-7675</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-683X |
ispartof | Soft matter, 2024-04, Vol.2 (16), p.3483-3498 |
issn | 1744-683X 1744-6848 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1039_D3SM01425H |
source | Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list) |
subjects | Alginates Alginates - chemistry Alginic acid Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Calcium ions Cancer Cell culture Cell Culture Techniques, Three Dimensional Chemical stimuli Collagen Collagen Type I - chemistry Collagen Type I - metabolism Constituents Crosslinking Elasticity Extracellular matrix Extracellular Matrix - chemistry Extracellular Matrix - metabolism Heterogeneity Humans Interpenetrating networks Measurement methods Mechanical properties Modelling Models, Biological Neoplasms Probability theory Rheology Rheometry Saturation Scaffolds Seaweed meal Shear modulus Stiffness Stroma Stromal Cells - cytology Stromal Cells - metabolism Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry Tumors Viscoelasticity Viscosity |
title | Measuring mechanical cues for modeling the stromal matrix in 3D cell cultures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A46%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20mechanical%20cues%20for%20modeling%20the%20stromal%20matrix%20in%203D%20cell%20cultures&rft.jtitle=Soft%20matter&rft.au=Srbova,%20Linda&rft.date=2024-04-24&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=3483&rft.epage=3498&rft.pages=3483-3498&rft.issn=1744-683X&rft.eissn=1744-6848&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d3sm01425h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034776073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-b0b1a93109aed8b25cdaa97fd4282190aa733e3a4a95b105418d1a929bd3b8193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3044296514&rft_id=info:pmid/38587658&rfr_iscdi=true |