Loading…

State-of-art analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are deep neural networks that can be trained on large databases and show outstanding performance on object classification, segmentation, image denoising etc. In the past few years, several image denoising techniques have been developed to improve the quality of a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IET image processing 2019-11, Vol.13 (13), p.2367-2380
Main Authors: Thakur, Rini Smita, Yadav, Ram Narayan, Gupta, Lalita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3
container_end_page 2380
container_issue 13
container_start_page 2367
container_title IET image processing
container_volume 13
creator Thakur, Rini Smita
Yadav, Ram Narayan
Gupta, Lalita
description Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are deep neural networks that can be trained on large databases and show outstanding performance on object classification, segmentation, image denoising etc. In the past few years, several image denoising techniques have been developed to improve the quality of an image. The CNN based image denoising models have shown improvement in denoising performance as compared to non-CNN methods like block-matching and three-dimensional (3D) filtering, contemporary wavelet and Markov random field approaches etc. which had remained state-of-the-art for years. This study provides a comprehensive study of state-of-the-art image denoising methods using CNN. The literature associated with different CNNs used for image restoration like residual learning based models (DnCNN-S, DnCNN-B, IDCNN), non-locality reinforced (NN3D), fast and flexible network (FFDNet), deep shrinkage CNN (SCNN), a model for mixed noise reduction, denoising prior driven network (PDNN) are reviewed. DnCNN-S and PDNN remove Gaussian noise of fixed level, whereas DnCNN-B, IDCNN, NN3D and SCNN are used for blind Gaussian denoising. FFDNet is used for spatially variant Gaussian noise. The performance of these CNN models is analysed on BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets. PDNN shows the best result in terms of PSNR for both BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets.
doi_str_mv 10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0157
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1049_iet_ipr_2019_0157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>IPR2BF01988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1OwyAUgInRxDl9AO94ASawAsU7XZwuWaLReU0opZPZlQVal769dDNe6tU5Jznf-fkAuCZ4QnAmb5xtkduFCcVETjBh4gSMiGAESc7F6W_O5Dm4iHGDMZM4ZyOwemt1a5GvkA4t1I2u--gi9BV0W722sLSNd9E1a7i17YcvI-wOlfHNl6-71vmEwMZ24RDavQ-f8RKcVbqO9uonjsH7_GE1e0LL58fF7G6JzFSIHHHKS00MFybLGc21pZhpxkpe8EIUTHOqrbbYFkRTkWGa8cyIgvKMSymNNNMxIMe5JvgYg63ULqSzQ68IVoMWlbSopEUNWtSgJTG3R2bvatv_D6jFyyu9n6cyzxOMjvDQtvFdSM_HP5Z9AwHtef8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>State-of-art analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><creator>Thakur, Rini Smita ; Yadav, Ram Narayan ; Gupta, Lalita</creator><creatorcontrib>Thakur, Rini Smita ; Yadav, Ram Narayan ; Gupta, Lalita</creatorcontrib><description>Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are deep neural networks that can be trained on large databases and show outstanding performance on object classification, segmentation, image denoising etc. In the past few years, several image denoising techniques have been developed to improve the quality of an image. The CNN based image denoising models have shown improvement in denoising performance as compared to non-CNN methods like block-matching and three-dimensional (3D) filtering, contemporary wavelet and Markov random field approaches etc. which had remained state-of-the-art for years. This study provides a comprehensive study of state-of-the-art image denoising methods using CNN. The literature associated with different CNNs used for image restoration like residual learning based models (DnCNN-S, DnCNN-B, IDCNN), non-locality reinforced (NN3D), fast and flexible network (FFDNet), deep shrinkage CNN (SCNN), a model for mixed noise reduction, denoising prior driven network (PDNN) are reviewed. DnCNN-S and PDNN remove Gaussian noise of fixed level, whereas DnCNN-B, IDCNN, NN3D and SCNN are used for blind Gaussian denoising. FFDNet is used for spatially variant Gaussian noise. The performance of these CNN models is analysed on BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets. PDNN shows the best result in terms of PSNR for both BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-9659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-9667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Institution of Engineering and Technology</publisher><subject>blind Gaussian denoising ; block‐matching ; CNN based image denoising models ; CNN models ; convolutional neural nets ; convolutional neural networks ; deep neural networks ; denoising performance ; DnCNN‐B ; DnCNN‐S ; Gaussian noise ; image denoising ; image restoration ; image segmentation ; learning (artificial intelligence) ; Markov random field approaches ; NN3D ; nonCNN methods ; object classification ; object segmentation ; PDNN ; prior driven network ; residual learning based models ; Review Article ; three‐dimensional filtering ; wavelet random field</subject><ispartof>IET image processing, 2019-11, Vol.13 (13), p.2367-2380</ispartof><rights>The Institution of Engineering and Technology</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. IET Image Processing published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1049%2Fiet-ipr.2019.0157$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1049%2Fiet-ipr.2019.0157$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,9755,11562,27924,27925,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1049%2Fiet-ipr.2019.0157$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thakur, Rini Smita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Ram Narayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Lalita</creatorcontrib><title>State-of-art analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks</title><title>IET image processing</title><description>Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are deep neural networks that can be trained on large databases and show outstanding performance on object classification, segmentation, image denoising etc. In the past few years, several image denoising techniques have been developed to improve the quality of an image. The CNN based image denoising models have shown improvement in denoising performance as compared to non-CNN methods like block-matching and three-dimensional (3D) filtering, contemporary wavelet and Markov random field approaches etc. which had remained state-of-the-art for years. This study provides a comprehensive study of state-of-the-art image denoising methods using CNN. The literature associated with different CNNs used for image restoration like residual learning based models (DnCNN-S, DnCNN-B, IDCNN), non-locality reinforced (NN3D), fast and flexible network (FFDNet), deep shrinkage CNN (SCNN), a model for mixed noise reduction, denoising prior driven network (PDNN) are reviewed. DnCNN-S and PDNN remove Gaussian noise of fixed level, whereas DnCNN-B, IDCNN, NN3D and SCNN are used for blind Gaussian denoising. FFDNet is used for spatially variant Gaussian noise. The performance of these CNN models is analysed on BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets. PDNN shows the best result in terms of PSNR for both BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets.</description><subject>blind Gaussian denoising</subject><subject>block‐matching</subject><subject>CNN based image denoising models</subject><subject>CNN models</subject><subject>convolutional neural nets</subject><subject>convolutional neural networks</subject><subject>deep neural networks</subject><subject>denoising performance</subject><subject>DnCNN‐B</subject><subject>DnCNN‐S</subject><subject>Gaussian noise</subject><subject>image denoising</subject><subject>image restoration</subject><subject>image segmentation</subject><subject>learning (artificial intelligence)</subject><subject>Markov random field approaches</subject><subject>NN3D</subject><subject>nonCNN methods</subject><subject>object classification</subject><subject>object segmentation</subject><subject>PDNN</subject><subject>prior driven network</subject><subject>residual learning based models</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>three‐dimensional filtering</subject><subject>wavelet random field</subject><issn>1751-9659</issn><issn>1751-9667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1OwyAUgInRxDl9AO94ASawAsU7XZwuWaLReU0opZPZlQVal769dDNe6tU5Jznf-fkAuCZ4QnAmb5xtkduFCcVETjBh4gSMiGAESc7F6W_O5Dm4iHGDMZM4ZyOwemt1a5GvkA4t1I2u--gi9BV0W722sLSNd9E1a7i17YcvI-wOlfHNl6-71vmEwMZ24RDavQ-f8RKcVbqO9uonjsH7_GE1e0LL58fF7G6JzFSIHHHKS00MFybLGc21pZhpxkpe8EIUTHOqrbbYFkRTkWGa8cyIgvKMSymNNNMxIMe5JvgYg63ULqSzQ68IVoMWlbSopEUNWtSgJTG3R2bvatv_D6jFyyu9n6cyzxOMjvDQtvFdSM_HP5Z9AwHtef8</recordid><startdate>20191114</startdate><enddate>20191114</enddate><creator>Thakur, Rini Smita</creator><creator>Yadav, Ram Narayan</creator><creator>Gupta, Lalita</creator><general>The Institution of Engineering and Technology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191114</creationdate><title>State-of-art analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks</title><author>Thakur, Rini Smita ; Yadav, Ram Narayan ; Gupta, Lalita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>blind Gaussian denoising</topic><topic>block‐matching</topic><topic>CNN based image denoising models</topic><topic>CNN models</topic><topic>convolutional neural nets</topic><topic>convolutional neural networks</topic><topic>deep neural networks</topic><topic>denoising performance</topic><topic>DnCNN‐B</topic><topic>DnCNN‐S</topic><topic>Gaussian noise</topic><topic>image denoising</topic><topic>image restoration</topic><topic>image segmentation</topic><topic>learning (artificial intelligence)</topic><topic>Markov random field approaches</topic><topic>NN3D</topic><topic>nonCNN methods</topic><topic>object classification</topic><topic>object segmentation</topic><topic>PDNN</topic><topic>prior driven network</topic><topic>residual learning based models</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>three‐dimensional filtering</topic><topic>wavelet random field</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thakur, Rini Smita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Ram Narayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Lalita</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IET image processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thakur, Rini Smita</au><au>Yadav, Ram Narayan</au><au>Gupta, Lalita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State-of-art analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks</atitle><jtitle>IET image processing</jtitle><date>2019-11-14</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2367</spage><epage>2380</epage><pages>2367-2380</pages><issn>1751-9659</issn><eissn>1751-9667</eissn><abstract>Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are deep neural networks that can be trained on large databases and show outstanding performance on object classification, segmentation, image denoising etc. In the past few years, several image denoising techniques have been developed to improve the quality of an image. The CNN based image denoising models have shown improvement in denoising performance as compared to non-CNN methods like block-matching and three-dimensional (3D) filtering, contemporary wavelet and Markov random field approaches etc. which had remained state-of-the-art for years. This study provides a comprehensive study of state-of-the-art image denoising methods using CNN. The literature associated with different CNNs used for image restoration like residual learning based models (DnCNN-S, DnCNN-B, IDCNN), non-locality reinforced (NN3D), fast and flexible network (FFDNet), deep shrinkage CNN (SCNN), a model for mixed noise reduction, denoising prior driven network (PDNN) are reviewed. DnCNN-S and PDNN remove Gaussian noise of fixed level, whereas DnCNN-B, IDCNN, NN3D and SCNN are used for blind Gaussian denoising. FFDNet is used for spatially variant Gaussian noise. The performance of these CNN models is analysed on BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets. PDNN shows the best result in terms of PSNR for both BSD-68 and Set-12 datasets.</abstract><pub>The Institution of Engineering and Technology</pub><doi>10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0157</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1751-9659
ispartof IET image processing, 2019-11, Vol.13 (13), p.2367-2380
issn 1751-9659
1751-9667
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1049_iet_ipr_2019_0157
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals
subjects blind Gaussian denoising
block‐matching
CNN based image denoising models
CNN models
convolutional neural nets
convolutional neural networks
deep neural networks
denoising performance
DnCNN‐B
DnCNN‐S
Gaussian noise
image denoising
image restoration
image segmentation
learning (artificial intelligence)
Markov random field approaches
NN3D
nonCNN methods
object classification
object segmentation
PDNN
prior driven network
residual learning based models
Review Article
three‐dimensional filtering
wavelet random field
title State-of-art analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State-of-art%20analysis%20of%20image%20denoising%20methods%20using%20convolutional%20neural%20networks&rft.jtitle=IET%20image%20processing&rft.au=Thakur,%20Rini%20Smita&rft.date=2019-11-14&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2367&rft.epage=2380&rft.pages=2367-2380&rft.issn=1751-9659&rft.eissn=1751-9667&rft_id=info:doi/10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0157&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_24P%3EIPR2BF01988%3C/wiley_24P%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-626da1c67c48528ae205a55d6b6b7b5a62aeae0eb1a27402464c7b2646999c9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true