Superflares on solar-like stars: A new method for identifying the true flare sources in photometric surveys

• Published in: Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2022-12, Vol.668, p.A167
• Main Authors: Vasilyev, V., Reinhold, T., Shapiro, A. I., Krivova, N. A., Usoskin, I., Montet, B. T., Solanki, S. K., Gizon, L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0004-6361; 1432-0746
• DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244422

Context. Over the past years, thousands of stellar flares have been detected by harvesting data from large photometric surveys. These detections, however, do not account for potential sources of contamination such as background stars or small Solar System objects appearing in the same aperture as the primary target. Aims. We present a new method for identifying the true flare sources in large photometric surveys using data from the Kepler mission as an illustrative example. The new method considers not only the brightness excess in the stellar light curves, but also the location of this excess in the pixel-level data. Methods. Potential flares are identified in two steps. First, we search the light curves for at least two subsequent data points exceeding a 5 σ threshold above the running mean. For these two cadences, we subtract the “quiet” stellar flux from the Kepler pixel data to obtain new images where the potential flare is the main light source. In the second step, we use a Bayesian approach to fit the point spread function of the instrument to determine the most likely location of the flux excess on the detector. We match this location with the position of the primary target and other stars from the Gaia DR2 catalog within a radius of 10 arcsec around the primary Kepler target. When the location of the flux excess and the target star coincide, we associate the event with a flare on the target star. Results. We applied our method to 5862 main-sequence stars with near-solar effective temperatures. From the first step we found 2274 events exceeding the 5σ level in at least two consecutive points in the light curves. Applying the second step reduced this number to 342 superflares. Of these, 283 flares occurred on 178 target stars and 47 events are associated with fainter background stars; in 10 cases the flare location could not be distinguished between the target and a background star. We also present cases where flares were reported previously but our technique could not attribute them to the target star. Conclusions. We conclude that identifying outliers in the light curves alone is insufficient to attribute them to stellar flares and that flares can only be uniquely attributed to a certain star when the instrument pixel-level data together with the point spread function are taken into account. As a consequence, previous flare statistics are likely contaminated by instrumental effects and unresolved astrophysical sources.