Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone–cement

Syringe mixing systems have been introduced, but few data exist regarding the mechanical performance of cement they produce. We compared the properties of polymethyl methacrylate cement produced by these systems with that produced by a multiaxial bowl. Mixtures of cement were prepared using the Opti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2000-08, Vol.15 (5), p.663-667
Main Authors: Wilkinson, J.M., Eveleigh, R., Hamer, A.J., Milne, A., Miles, A.W., Stockley, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
acrylic bone—cement
bowl
mechanical properties
porosity
syringe
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83
container_end_page 667
container_issue 5
container_start_page 663
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 15
creator Wilkinson, J.M.
Eveleigh, R.
Hamer, A.J.
Milne, A.
Miles, A.W.
Stockley, I.
description Syringe mixing systems have been introduced, but few data exist regarding the mechanical performance of cement they produce. We compared the properties of polymethyl methacrylate cement produced by these systems with that produced by a multiaxial bowl. Mixtures of cement were prepared using the Optivac, Cemvac, and Summit syringes and the Summit bowl. The mixtures were cured in molds to create casts that were radiographed and analyzed for void content, then cut into strips, weighed, measured, and tested to failure in 4-point bending. Syringe-mixed cement was of greater density, bending modulus, and bending strength than bowl-mixed cement (Mann-Whitney, P
doi_str_mv 10.1054/arth.2000.6620
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1054_arth_2000_6620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S088354030066816X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S088354030066816X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZe0fSBg_6y5RVR5SJTawthxnQoyapNgG0R3_wB_yJU1UtmxmNnNG9x5CrhmUDJS8cTG3JQeAUmsOJ2TGlOCFkaBPyQyMEYWSIM7JRUpvAIwpJWdkvW4a9JkODe3CV-hfaUbf9uH9A-nQ09wi3cVhhzEHTNOV83G_DZ5WQ4-_3z8eO-zzJTlr3Dbh1d-ek5e79fPqodg83T-ubjeFZ0JAgVgttOTAKl0ZlNwtvdLagdZ1pWTtapRLoZRh9VI0fJzKLZiRimvlKu-MmJPy-NfHIaWIjd3F0Lm4twzsJMFOEuwkwU4SRsAcARxTfQaMNvmAvcc6xLG2rYfwH3oAr9JkFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone–cement</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Wilkinson, J.M. ; Eveleigh, R. ; Hamer, A.J. ; Milne, A. ; Miles, A.W. ; Stockley, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, J.M. ; Eveleigh, R. ; Hamer, A.J. ; Milne, A. ; Miles, A.W. ; Stockley, I.</creatorcontrib><description>Syringe mixing systems have been introduced, but few data exist regarding the mechanical performance of cement they produce. We compared the properties of polymethyl methacrylate cement produced by these systems with that produced by a multiaxial bowl. Mixtures of cement were prepared using the Optivac, Cemvac, and Summit syringes and the Summit bowl. The mixtures were cured in molds to create casts that were radiographed and analyzed for void content, then cut into strips, weighed, measured, and tested to failure in 4-point bending. Syringe-mixed cement was of greater density, bending modulus, and bending strength than bowl-mixed cement (Mann-Whitney, P &lt;.01) and contained fewer microvoids and macrovoids (Mann-Whitney, P &lt;.01). No significant differences between the syringes were found for these variables (Kruskall-Wallis, P&gt;.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.6620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acrylic bone—cement ; bowl ; mechanical properties ; porosity ; syringe</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2000-08, Vol.15 (5), p.663-667</ispartof><rights>2000 Churchill Livingstone</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eveleigh, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamer, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, A.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockley, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone–cement</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><description>Syringe mixing systems have been introduced, but few data exist regarding the mechanical performance of cement they produce. We compared the properties of polymethyl methacrylate cement produced by these systems with that produced by a multiaxial bowl. Mixtures of cement were prepared using the Optivac, Cemvac, and Summit syringes and the Summit bowl. The mixtures were cured in molds to create casts that were radiographed and analyzed for void content, then cut into strips, weighed, measured, and tested to failure in 4-point bending. Syringe-mixed cement was of greater density, bending modulus, and bending strength than bowl-mixed cement (Mann-Whitney, P &lt;.01) and contained fewer microvoids and macrovoids (Mann-Whitney, P &lt;.01). No significant differences between the syringes were found for these variables (Kruskall-Wallis, P&gt;.05).</description><subject>acrylic bone—cement</subject><subject>bowl</subject><subject>mechanical properties</subject><subject>porosity</subject><subject>syringe</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZe0fSBg_6y5RVR5SJTawthxnQoyapNgG0R3_wB_yJU1UtmxmNnNG9x5CrhmUDJS8cTG3JQeAUmsOJ2TGlOCFkaBPyQyMEYWSIM7JRUpvAIwpJWdkvW4a9JkODe3CV-hfaUbf9uH9A-nQ09wi3cVhhzEHTNOV83G_DZ5WQ4-_3z8eO-zzJTlr3Dbh1d-ek5e79fPqodg83T-ubjeFZ0JAgVgttOTAKl0ZlNwtvdLagdZ1pWTtapRLoZRh9VI0fJzKLZiRimvlKu-MmJPy-NfHIaWIjd3F0Lm4twzsJMFOEuwkwU4SRsAcARxTfQaMNvmAvcc6xLG2rYfwH3oAr9JkFQ</recordid><startdate>200008</startdate><enddate>200008</enddate><creator>Wilkinson, J.M.</creator><creator>Eveleigh, R.</creator><creator>Hamer, A.J.</creator><creator>Milne, A.</creator><creator>Miles, A.W.</creator><creator>Stockley, I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200008</creationdate><title>Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone–cement</title><author>Wilkinson, J.M. ; Eveleigh, R. ; Hamer, A.J. ; Milne, A. ; Miles, A.W. ; Stockley, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>acrylic bone—cement</topic><topic>bowl</topic><topic>mechanical properties</topic><topic>porosity</topic><topic>syringe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eveleigh, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamer, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, A.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockley, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilkinson, J.M.</au><au>Eveleigh, R.</au><au>Hamer, A.J.</au><au>Milne, A.</au><au>Miles, A.W.</au><au>Stockley, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone–cement</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><date>2000-08</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>663-667</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Syringe mixing systems have been introduced, but few data exist regarding the mechanical performance of cement they produce. We compared the properties of polymethyl methacrylate cement produced by these systems with that produced by a multiaxial bowl. Mixtures of cement were prepared using the Optivac, Cemvac, and Summit syringes and the Summit bowl. The mixtures were cured in molds to create casts that were radiographed and analyzed for void content, then cut into strips, weighed, measured, and tested to failure in 4-point bending. Syringe-mixed cement was of greater density, bending modulus, and bending strength than bowl-mixed cement (Mann-Whitney, P &lt;.01) and contained fewer microvoids and macrovoids (Mann-Whitney, P &lt;.01). No significant differences between the syringes were found for these variables (Kruskall-Wallis, P&gt;.05).</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1054/arth.2000.6620</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2000-08, Vol.15 (5), p.663-667
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1054_arth_2000_6620
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects acrylic bone—cement
bowl
mechanical properties
porosity
syringe
title Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone–cement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A54%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20mixing%20technique%20on%20the%20properties%20of%20acrylic%20bone%E2%80%93cement&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Wilkinson,%20J.M.&rft.date=2000-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=663-667&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/arth.2000.6620&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES088354030066816X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1330-eeb764201b6b8e42a9c566a066db54dade4935581d93f21d95a71845265abca83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true