Loading…

Evaluation of the computational methods for electron-impact total ionization cross sections: Fluoromethanes as benchmarks

The experimental electron-impact total ionization cross sections (TICSs, ICSs) of CF4, CHF3, CH2F2, and CH3F fluoromethanes reported so far and a new set of data obtained with a linear double focusing time-of-flight mass spectrometer have been compared with the ab initio and (semi)empirical based IC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of chemical physics 2001-09, Vol.115 (9), p.4041-4050
Main Authors: Torres, I., Martı́nez, R., Sánchez Rayo, M. N., Castaño, F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3
container_end_page 4050
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4041
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 115
creator Torres, I.
Martı́nez, R.
Sánchez Rayo, M. N.
Castaño, F.
description The experimental electron-impact total ionization cross sections (TICSs, ICSs) of CF4, CHF3, CH2F2, and CH3F fluoromethanes reported so far and a new set of data obtained with a linear double focusing time-of-flight mass spectrometer have been compared with the ab initio and (semi)empirical based ICS available methods. TICSs computational methods include: two approximations of the binary-encounter dipole (BED) referred to hereafter as Kim (Kim-BEB) and Khare (Khare-BEB) methods, the Deutsch and Märk (DM) formalism, also requiring atomic and molecular ab initio information, the modified additivity rule (MAR), and the Harland and Vallance (HV) methods, both based on semiempirical or empirical correlations. The molecular ab initio information required by the Kim, Khare, and DM methods has been computed at a variety of quantum chemistry levels, with and without electron correlation and a comprehensive series of basis sets. The general conclusions are summarized as follows: the Kim method yields TICS in excellent agreement with the experimental method; the Khare method provides TICS very close to that of Kim at low electron-impact energies (
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.1388041
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_1388041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1063_1_1388041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAURYMoOI4u_AfZuuj4krSdxJ0MM6Mw4EbXJU1eaLVthiQVxl9v52P1uI_D4XIJeWSwYFCKZ7ZgQkrI2RWZMZAqW5YKrskMgLNMlVDekrsYvwGALXk-I4f1r-5GnVo_UO9oapAa3-_HdHrpjvaYGm8jdT5Q7NCk4Ies7ffaJJp8moiJa__OBhN8jDRO1JTiC910ow_-qNADRqojrXEwTa_DT7wnN053ER8ud06-NuvP1Vu2-9i-r153meFKpEwXVtnCKeG0UVJbhxYlGgQsTF3XCrkraiZNKbgslsJJLkqrkbNpBJcXVszJ09l7KhfQVfvQTg0OFYPquFnFqstm4h8Gx2L4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the computational methods for electron-impact total ionization cross sections: Fluoromethanes as benchmarks</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><source>AIP - American Institute of Physics</source><creator>Torres, I. ; Martı́nez, R. ; Sánchez Rayo, M. N. ; Castaño, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres, I. ; Martı́nez, R. ; Sánchez Rayo, M. N. ; Castaño, F.</creatorcontrib><description>The experimental electron-impact total ionization cross sections (TICSs, ICSs) of CF4, CHF3, CH2F2, and CH3F fluoromethanes reported so far and a new set of data obtained with a linear double focusing time-of-flight mass spectrometer have been compared with the ab initio and (semi)empirical based ICS available methods. TICSs computational methods include: two approximations of the binary-encounter dipole (BED) referred to hereafter as Kim (Kim-BEB) and Khare (Khare-BEB) methods, the Deutsch and Märk (DM) formalism, also requiring atomic and molecular ab initio information, the modified additivity rule (MAR), and the Harland and Vallance (HV) methods, both based on semiempirical or empirical correlations. The molecular ab initio information required by the Kim, Khare, and DM methods has been computed at a variety of quantum chemistry levels, with and without electron correlation and a comprehensive series of basis sets. The general conclusions are summarized as follows: the Kim method yields TICS in excellent agreement with the experimental method; the Khare method provides TICS very close to that of Kim at low electron-impact energies (&lt;100 eV), but their Mott and Bethe contributions are noticeably different; in the Kim and Khare approximations the electron correlation methods improve the fittings to the experimental profiles in contrast with the large basis sets, that leads to poorer results; the DM formalism yields TICS profiles with shapes similar to the experimental and the BEB methods, but consistently lower and with the profiles maxima shifted towards lower incident electron energies; the MAR method supplies very good ICS profiles, between those of BEB and DM methods; finally, the empirical HV method provides rather poor fittings concomitant with the simplicity and the few empirical parameters used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.1388041</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2001-09, Vol.115 (9), p.4041-4050</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,782,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martı́nez, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Rayo, M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaño, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the computational methods for electron-impact total ionization cross sections: Fluoromethanes as benchmarks</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><description>The experimental electron-impact total ionization cross sections (TICSs, ICSs) of CF4, CHF3, CH2F2, and CH3F fluoromethanes reported so far and a new set of data obtained with a linear double focusing time-of-flight mass spectrometer have been compared with the ab initio and (semi)empirical based ICS available methods. TICSs computational methods include: two approximations of the binary-encounter dipole (BED) referred to hereafter as Kim (Kim-BEB) and Khare (Khare-BEB) methods, the Deutsch and Märk (DM) formalism, also requiring atomic and molecular ab initio information, the modified additivity rule (MAR), and the Harland and Vallance (HV) methods, both based on semiempirical or empirical correlations. The molecular ab initio information required by the Kim, Khare, and DM methods has been computed at a variety of quantum chemistry levels, with and without electron correlation and a comprehensive series of basis sets. The general conclusions are summarized as follows: the Kim method yields TICS in excellent agreement with the experimental method; the Khare method provides TICS very close to that of Kim at low electron-impact energies (&lt;100 eV), but their Mott and Bethe contributions are noticeably different; in the Kim and Khare approximations the electron correlation methods improve the fittings to the experimental profiles in contrast with the large basis sets, that leads to poorer results; the DM formalism yields TICS profiles with shapes similar to the experimental and the BEB methods, but consistently lower and with the profiles maxima shifted towards lower incident electron energies; the MAR method supplies very good ICS profiles, between those of BEB and DM methods; finally, the empirical HV method provides rather poor fittings concomitant with the simplicity and the few empirical parameters used.</description><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAURYMoOI4u_AfZuuj4krSdxJ0MM6Mw4EbXJU1eaLVthiQVxl9v52P1uI_D4XIJeWSwYFCKZ7ZgQkrI2RWZMZAqW5YKrskMgLNMlVDekrsYvwGALXk-I4f1r-5GnVo_UO9oapAa3-_HdHrpjvaYGm8jdT5Q7NCk4Ies7ffaJJp8moiJa__OBhN8jDRO1JTiC910ow_-qNADRqojrXEwTa_DT7wnN053ER8ud06-NuvP1Vu2-9i-r153meFKpEwXVtnCKeG0UVJbhxYlGgQsTF3XCrkraiZNKbgslsJJLkqrkbNpBJcXVszJ09l7KhfQVfvQTg0OFYPquFnFqstm4h8Gx2L4</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Torres, I.</creator><creator>Martı́nez, R.</creator><creator>Sánchez Rayo, M. N.</creator><creator>Castaño, F.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the computational methods for electron-impact total ionization cross sections: Fluoromethanes as benchmarks</title><author>Torres, I. ; Martı́nez, R. ; Sánchez Rayo, M. N. ; Castaño, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martı́nez, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Rayo, M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaño, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, I.</au><au>Martı́nez, R.</au><au>Sánchez Rayo, M. N.</au><au>Castaño, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the computational methods for electron-impact total ionization cross sections: Fluoromethanes as benchmarks</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4041</spage><epage>4050</epage><pages>4041-4050</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><abstract>The experimental electron-impact total ionization cross sections (TICSs, ICSs) of CF4, CHF3, CH2F2, and CH3F fluoromethanes reported so far and a new set of data obtained with a linear double focusing time-of-flight mass spectrometer have been compared with the ab initio and (semi)empirical based ICS available methods. TICSs computational methods include: two approximations of the binary-encounter dipole (BED) referred to hereafter as Kim (Kim-BEB) and Khare (Khare-BEB) methods, the Deutsch and Märk (DM) formalism, also requiring atomic and molecular ab initio information, the modified additivity rule (MAR), and the Harland and Vallance (HV) methods, both based on semiempirical or empirical correlations. The molecular ab initio information required by the Kim, Khare, and DM methods has been computed at a variety of quantum chemistry levels, with and without electron correlation and a comprehensive series of basis sets. The general conclusions are summarized as follows: the Kim method yields TICS in excellent agreement with the experimental method; the Khare method provides TICS very close to that of Kim at low electron-impact energies (&lt;100 eV), but their Mott and Bethe contributions are noticeably different; in the Kim and Khare approximations the electron correlation methods improve the fittings to the experimental profiles in contrast with the large basis sets, that leads to poorer results; the DM formalism yields TICS profiles with shapes similar to the experimental and the BEB methods, but consistently lower and with the profiles maxima shifted towards lower incident electron energies; the MAR method supplies very good ICS profiles, between those of BEB and DM methods; finally, the empirical HV method provides rather poor fittings concomitant with the simplicity and the few empirical parameters used.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.1388041</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2001-09, Vol.115 (9), p.4041-4050
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_1388041
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list); AIP - American Institute of Physics
title Evaluation of the computational methods for electron-impact total ionization cross sections: Fluoromethanes as benchmarks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20computational%20methods%20for%20electron-impact%20total%20ionization%20cross%20sections:%20Fluoromethanes%20as%20benchmarks&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Torres,%20I.&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4041&rft.epage=4050&rft.pages=4041-4050&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.1388041&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1063_1_1388041%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-a5d9d5f93fac98adfede8ece0e5cbbb9e2f5b18c6328573f8236dae21804f45d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true