Loading…

Phenomenological Distinction between Unitary and Antiunitary Symmetry Operators

It is well known that one always can find as many orthogonal states (i.e., states between which the transition probability is zero) as the Hilbert space has dimensions which are invariant under a given unitary transformation. The corresponding vectors are characteristic vectors of the unitary operat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mathematical physics 1960-09, Vol.1 (5), p.414-416
Main Author: Wigner, Eugene P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33
container_end_page 416
container_issue 5
container_start_page 414
container_title Journal of mathematical physics
container_volume 1
creator Wigner, Eugene P.
description It is well known that one always can find as many orthogonal states (i.e., states between which the transition probability is zero) as the Hilbert space has dimensions which are invariant under a given unitary transformation. The corresponding vectors are characteristic vectors of the unitary operator. In contrast, most antiunitary operators leave not more than one state invariant. However, if there are two orthogonal invariant states, a consideration of the states for which the transition probability is ½ into both invariant states surely provides a distinction. In the antiunitary case, one of these states is also invariant, another one is transformed into an orthogonal state, the rest are in between. In the unitary case, the transition probability between original state and transformed state is the same for all states for which the transition probability is ½ into two orthogonal states. This provides a ``directly observable'' distinction between unitary and antiunitary transformations.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.1703673
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_1703673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jmp</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoO-KnTeNWmbPo7pVBhM0D2XNE000qYjicq-vRkr-iB4cNwd_Pjf_46QS4QZQkFvcIYl0KKkR2SCwKu0LHJ-TCYAWZZmjPNTcub9OwAiZ2xC1k9vyg59zG54NVJ0ya3xwVgZzGCTRoUvpWyysSYIt0uEbZO5DeZjnJ93fa9CbNZb5UQYnD8nJ1p0Xl2MdUo2y7uXxUO6Wt8_LuarVFLKQqrjcmAxdKMbbJHlRd5kOZcclK4UihYKnQNWZVZxtSeglRVjIi9AKEXplFwddKUbvHdK11tn-uipRqj3n6ixHj8R2esD62W0vT_sB_4c3C9Yb1v9H_xX-Rv9dG29</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenomenological Distinction between Unitary and Antiunitary Symmetry Operators</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Wigner, Eugene P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wigner, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><description>It is well known that one always can find as many orthogonal states (i.e., states between which the transition probability is zero) as the Hilbert space has dimensions which are invariant under a given unitary transformation. The corresponding vectors are characteristic vectors of the unitary operator. In contrast, most antiunitary operators leave not more than one state invariant. However, if there are two orthogonal invariant states, a consideration of the states for which the transition probability is ½ into both invariant states surely provides a distinction. In the antiunitary case, one of these states is also invariant, another one is transformed into an orthogonal state, the rest are in between. In the unitary case, the transition probability between original state and transformed state is the same for all states for which the transition probability is ½ into two orthogonal states. This provides a ``directly observable'' distinction between unitary and antiunitary transformations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.1703673</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMAPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of mathematical physics, 1960-09, Vol.1 (5), p.414-416</ispartof><rights>American Institute of Physics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jmp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.1703673$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1559,27924,27925,76390</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wigner, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><title>Phenomenological Distinction between Unitary and Antiunitary Symmetry Operators</title><title>Journal of mathematical physics</title><description>It is well known that one always can find as many orthogonal states (i.e., states between which the transition probability is zero) as the Hilbert space has dimensions which are invariant under a given unitary transformation. The corresponding vectors are characteristic vectors of the unitary operator. In contrast, most antiunitary operators leave not more than one state invariant. However, if there are two orthogonal invariant states, a consideration of the states for which the transition probability is ½ into both invariant states surely provides a distinction. In the antiunitary case, one of these states is also invariant, another one is transformed into an orthogonal state, the rest are in between. In the unitary case, the transition probability between original state and transformed state is the same for all states for which the transition probability is ½ into two orthogonal states. This provides a ``directly observable'' distinction between unitary and antiunitary transformations.</description><issn>0022-2488</issn><issn>1089-7658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1960</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoO-KnTeNWmbPo7pVBhM0D2XNE000qYjicq-vRkr-iB4cNwd_Pjf_46QS4QZQkFvcIYl0KKkR2SCwKu0LHJ-TCYAWZZmjPNTcub9OwAiZ2xC1k9vyg59zG54NVJ0ya3xwVgZzGCTRoUvpWyysSYIt0uEbZO5DeZjnJ93fa9CbNZb5UQYnD8nJ1p0Xl2MdUo2y7uXxUO6Wt8_LuarVFLKQqrjcmAxdKMbbJHlRd5kOZcclK4UihYKnQNWZVZxtSeglRVjIi9AKEXplFwddKUbvHdK11tn-uipRqj3n6ixHj8R2esD62W0vT_sB_4c3C9Yb1v9H_xX-Rv9dG29</recordid><startdate>196009</startdate><enddate>196009</enddate><creator>Wigner, Eugene P.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196009</creationdate><title>Phenomenological Distinction between Unitary and Antiunitary Symmetry Operators</title><author>Wigner, Eugene P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1960</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wigner, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of mathematical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wigner, Eugene P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenomenological Distinction between Unitary and Antiunitary Symmetry Operators</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mathematical physics</jtitle><date>1960-09</date><risdate>1960</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>414-416</pages><issn>0022-2488</issn><eissn>1089-7658</eissn><coden>JMAPAQ</coden><abstract>It is well known that one always can find as many orthogonal states (i.e., states between which the transition probability is zero) as the Hilbert space has dimensions which are invariant under a given unitary transformation. The corresponding vectors are characteristic vectors of the unitary operator. In contrast, most antiunitary operators leave not more than one state invariant. However, if there are two orthogonal invariant states, a consideration of the states for which the transition probability is ½ into both invariant states surely provides a distinction. In the antiunitary case, one of these states is also invariant, another one is transformed into an orthogonal state, the rest are in between. In the unitary case, the transition probability between original state and transformed state is the same for all states for which the transition probability is ½ into two orthogonal states. This provides a ``directly observable'' distinction between unitary and antiunitary transformations.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.1703673</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2488
ispartof Journal of mathematical physics, 1960-09, Vol.1 (5), p.414-416
issn 0022-2488
1089-7658
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_1703673
source AIP Digital Archive
title Phenomenological Distinction between Unitary and Antiunitary Symmetry Operators
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A17%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenomenological%20Distinction%20between%20Unitary%20and%20Antiunitary%20Symmetry%20Operators&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mathematical%20physics&rft.au=Wigner,%20Eugene%20P.&rft.date=1960-09&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=414-416&rft.issn=0022-2488&rft.eissn=1089-7658&rft.coden=JMAPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.1703673&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejmp%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f84404444fbfb1d14565b258c80ef9e1ad06f50197298eb1d10dc944a560aee33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true