Loading…

Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates

Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied physics 2011-08, Vol.110 (4), p.043526-043526-8
Main Authors: Gabriel, Nicholas T., Talghader, Joseph J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3
container_end_page 043526-8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 043526
container_title Journal of applied physics
container_volume 110
creator Gabriel, Nicholas T.
Talghader, Joseph J.
description Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.3626462
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_3626462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jap</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWFcPvkGuHrJOmiZpLoIsui4seFnPZZombKRNpemK-_Zu2R68CAMzDB8_Px8h9xyWHJR45EuhclWo_IJkHErDtJRwSTKAnLPSaHNNblL6BOC8FCYjm93eDR221PaxOdgxfIfxSDE2dHB-wOnhaIiN-6G9p3v0MSDD9tCFiDRi7FucztGlW3LlsU3ubt4L8vH6slu9se37erN63jIrJIysNmAbAKkMlgocQi1qZVEUSnt9GpRSl8bqErUzaLwAZaG2tZe5BiisWJCHc64d-pROLauvIXQ4HCsO1eSg4tXs4MQ-ndlkw4hj6OP_8Cyi-itC_AJzQmTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Gabriel, Nicholas T. ; Talghader, Joseph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Nicholas T. ; Talghader, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.3626462</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Institute of Physics</publisher><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2011-08, Vol.110 (4), p.043526-043526-8</ispartof><rights>2011 American Institute of Physics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talghader, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.</description><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWFcPvkGuHrJOmiZpLoIsui4seFnPZZombKRNpemK-_Zu2R68CAMzDB8_Px8h9xyWHJR45EuhclWo_IJkHErDtJRwSTKAnLPSaHNNblL6BOC8FCYjm93eDR221PaxOdgxfIfxSDE2dHB-wOnhaIiN-6G9p3v0MSDD9tCFiDRi7FucztGlW3LlsU3ubt4L8vH6slu9se37erN63jIrJIysNmAbAKkMlgocQi1qZVEUSnt9GpRSl8bqErUzaLwAZaG2tZe5BiisWJCHc64d-pROLauvIXQ4HCsO1eSg4tXs4MQ-ndlkw4hj6OP_8Cyi-itC_AJzQmTT</recordid><startdate>20110815</startdate><enddate>20110815</enddate><creator>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</creator><creator>Talghader, Joseph J.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110815</creationdate><title>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</title><author>Gabriel, Nicholas T. ; Talghader, Joseph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talghader, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabriel, Nicholas T.</au><au>Talghader, Joseph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2011-08-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>043526</spage><epage>043526-8</epage><pages>043526-043526-8</pages><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>Hafnia-alumina nanolaminates show improved smoothness and reduced crystallinity relative to pure hafnia in films formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, typical nanolaminates also show reduced cross-plane thermal conductivity due to the much larger interface density relative to continuous films. We find that the interface thermal resistance in hafnia-alumina nanolaminates is very low and does not dominate the film thermal conductivity, which is 1.0 to 1.2 W/(m K) at room temperature in 100 nm thin films regardless of the interface density. Measured films had a number of interfaces ranging from 2 to 40, equivalent to interface spacing varying from about 40 to 2 nm. The degree of crystallinity of these films appears to have a much larger effect on thermal conductivity than that of interface density. Cryogenic measurements show good agreement with both the minimum thermal conductivity model for disordered solids and the diffuse mismatch model of interface resistance down to about 80 K before diverging. We find that the films are quite smooth through a 400:5 ratio of hafnia to alumina in terms of ALD cycles, and the refractive index scales as expected with increasing alumina concentration.</abstract><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.3626462</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8979
ispartof Journal of applied physics, 2011-08, Vol.110 (4), p.043526-043526-8
issn 0021-8979
1089-7550
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_3626462
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
title Thermal conductivity and refractive index of hafnia-alumina nanolaminates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermal%20conductivity%20and%20refractive%20index%20of%20hafnia-alumina%20nanolaminates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Gabriel,%20Nicholas%20T.&rft.date=2011-08-15&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=043526&rft.epage=043526-8&rft.pages=043526-043526-8&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.3626462&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejap%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-b90cd00569a860ea0b3b6ca3467f77f7a55789c78a7e9a9f306c0bcbf527004c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true