Loading…

Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices

A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied physics 1996-06, Vol.79 (11), p.8792-8797
Main Authors: Hayden, R. K., Woods, R. C., Kumagai, S., Yamanouchi, K., Grey, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3
container_end_page 8797
container_issue 11
container_start_page 8792
container_title Journal of applied physics
container_volume 79
creator Hayden, R. K.
Woods, R. C.
Kumagai, S.
Yamanouchi, K.
Grey, R.
description A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.362668
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_362668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1063_1_362668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAUAC0EEqUg8RM8sgSe48S1R1TxJVVigTlyn99rU6VxsR0Q_x5QmW453XBCXCu4VWD0nbrVpjbGnoiZAuuqRdvCqZgB1KqybuHOxUXOOwClrHYzEZZxf_Cpz3GUkeXH5Mcy7eUXDYP0Y5C5HzcDyS0VSnE3jVj6XzOXNGGZEmXJMUmPccqlR4lbnzYkS_JjZkoy0GePlC_FGfsh09U_5-L98eFt-VytXp9elverCuu6LRUjrxH8GlprG2c8B9LsDJuFR2TnfQACFUgFaLS1KmDAGqlBbrxiDnoubo5dTDHnRNwdUr_36btT0P3d6VR3vKN_AKDFW3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Hayden, R. K. ; Woods, R. C. ; Kumagai, S. ; Yamanouchi, K. ; Grey, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayden, R. K. ; Woods, R. C. ; Kumagai, S. ; Yamanouchi, K. ; Grey, R.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.362668</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 1996-06, Vol.79 (11), p.8792-8797</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayden, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumagai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanouchi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.</description><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAUAC0EEqUg8RM8sgSe48S1R1TxJVVigTlyn99rU6VxsR0Q_x5QmW453XBCXCu4VWD0nbrVpjbGnoiZAuuqRdvCqZgB1KqybuHOxUXOOwClrHYzEZZxf_Cpz3GUkeXH5Mcy7eUXDYP0Y5C5HzcDyS0VSnE3jVj6XzOXNGGZEmXJMUmPccqlR4lbnzYkS_JjZkoy0GePlC_FGfsh09U_5-L98eFt-VytXp9elverCuu6LRUjrxH8GlprG2c8B9LsDJuFR2TnfQACFUgFaLS1KmDAGqlBbrxiDnoubo5dTDHnRNwdUr_36btT0P3d6VR3vKN_AKDFW3U</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>Hayden, R. K.</creator><creator>Woods, R. C.</creator><creator>Kumagai, S.</creator><creator>Yamanouchi, K.</creator><creator>Grey, R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</title><author>Hayden, R. K. ; Woods, R. C. ; Kumagai, S. ; Yamanouchi, K. ; Grey, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayden, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumagai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanouchi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayden, R. K.</au><au>Woods, R. C.</au><au>Kumagai, S.</au><au>Yamanouchi, K.</au><au>Grey, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>8792</spage><epage>8797</epage><pages>8792-8797</pages><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><abstract>A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.362668</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8979
ispartof Journal of applied physics, 1996-06, Vol.79 (11), p.8792-8797
issn 0021-8979
1089-7550
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_362668
source AIP Digital Archive
title Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A22%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20quantum%20well%20and%20single%20heterojunction%20structures%20for%20acoustic%20charge%20transfer%20devices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Hayden,%20R.%20K.&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=8792&rft.epage=8797&rft.pages=8792-8797&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.362668&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1063_1_362668%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true