Loading…
Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices
A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied physics 1996-06, Vol.79 (11), p.8792-8797 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3 |
container_end_page | 8797 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 8792 |
container_title | Journal of applied physics |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Hayden, R. K. Woods, R. C. Kumagai, S. Yamanouchi, K. Grey, R. |
description | A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.362668 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_362668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1063_1_362668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAUAC0EEqUg8RM8sgSe48S1R1TxJVVigTlyn99rU6VxsR0Q_x5QmW453XBCXCu4VWD0nbrVpjbGnoiZAuuqRdvCqZgB1KqybuHOxUXOOwClrHYzEZZxf_Cpz3GUkeXH5Mcy7eUXDYP0Y5C5HzcDyS0VSnE3jVj6XzOXNGGZEmXJMUmPccqlR4lbnzYkS_JjZkoy0GePlC_FGfsh09U_5-L98eFt-VytXp9elverCuu6LRUjrxH8GlprG2c8B9LsDJuFR2TnfQACFUgFaLS1KmDAGqlBbrxiDnoubo5dTDHnRNwdUr_36btT0P3d6VR3vKN_AKDFW3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Hayden, R. K. ; Woods, R. C. ; Kumagai, S. ; Yamanouchi, K. ; Grey, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayden, R. K. ; Woods, R. C. ; Kumagai, S. ; Yamanouchi, K. ; Grey, R.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.362668</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 1996-06, Vol.79 (11), p.8792-8797</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayden, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumagai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanouchi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.</description><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAUAC0EEqUg8RM8sgSe48S1R1TxJVVigTlyn99rU6VxsR0Q_x5QmW453XBCXCu4VWD0nbrVpjbGnoiZAuuqRdvCqZgB1KqybuHOxUXOOwClrHYzEZZxf_Cpz3GUkeXH5Mcy7eUXDYP0Y5C5HzcDyS0VSnE3jVj6XzOXNGGZEmXJMUmPccqlR4lbnzYkS_JjZkoy0GePlC_FGfsh09U_5-L98eFt-VytXp9elverCuu6LRUjrxH8GlprG2c8B9LsDJuFR2TnfQACFUgFaLS1KmDAGqlBbrxiDnoubo5dTDHnRNwdUr_36btT0P3d6VR3vKN_AKDFW3U</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>Hayden, R. K.</creator><creator>Woods, R. C.</creator><creator>Kumagai, S.</creator><creator>Yamanouchi, K.</creator><creator>Grey, R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</title><author>Hayden, R. K. ; Woods, R. C. ; Kumagai, S. ; Yamanouchi, K. ; Grey, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayden, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumagai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanouchi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayden, R. K.</au><au>Woods, R. C.</au><au>Kumagai, S.</au><au>Yamanouchi, K.</au><au>Grey, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>8792</spage><epage>8797</epage><pages>8792-8797</pages><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><abstract>A number of acoustic charge transfer devices have been fabricated, using both a single heterojunction structure and a quantum well structure. The single heterojunction structure was found to give a signal-to-noise ratio comparable to that given by the quantum well structure. In both cases the ratio was less than unity. The experimental results show that the performance of acoustic charge transfer devices using heterostructures is less dependent on the quality of the epitaxial growth than has previously been believed. The single heterojunction structure has been modelled to show that a device with high signal-to-noise ratio is difficult to obtain. However, the experimental results show that this is not essential for observation of acoustic charge transfer. This combination of results and the present limitations of epitaxial growth show that quantum well structures have little or no practical advantage over single heterojunction structures for use as acoustic charge transfer devices.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.362668</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8979 |
ispartof | Journal of applied physics, 1996-06, Vol.79 (11), p.8792-8797 |
issn | 0021-8979 1089-7550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1063_1_362668 |
source | AIP Digital Archive |
title | Comparison of quantum well and single heterojunction structures for acoustic charge transfer devices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A22%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20quantum%20well%20and%20single%20heterojunction%20structures%20for%20acoustic%20charge%20transfer%20devices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Hayden,%20R.%20K.&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=8792&rft.epage=8797&rft.pages=8792-8797&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.362668&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1063_1_362668%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-fcfbc0ab0588496afde3f96f67accf9aad0e01de1d043881dcdc2ce4cf4a1ffd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |