Loading…

Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy

Objective: Blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with a disturbance of the baroreflex control mechanism caused by the surgery in the carotid sinus region. The purpose of this study was to determine if a deterioration in carotid baroreceptors occurs during...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vascular surgery 2002-10, Vol.36 (4), p.793-798
Main Authors: Sigaudo-Roussel, D., Evans, D.H., Naylor, A.R., Panerai, R.B., London, N.L., Bell, P., Gaunt, M.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-296e28c387661718342af9b8a39de10c97575c904c56fd618d1daf56831d0deb3
cites
container_end_page 798
container_issue 4
container_start_page 793
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 36
creator Sigaudo-Roussel, D.
Evans, D.H.
Naylor, A.R.
Panerai, R.B.
London, N.L.
Bell, P.
Gaunt, M.E.
description Objective: Blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with a disturbance of the baroreflex control mechanism caused by the surgery in the carotid sinus region. The purpose of this study was to determine if a deterioration in carotid baroreceptors occurs during the surgery. Method: Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were recorded continuously in 60 patients undergoing CEA as well as preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 days and 6 weeks. The baroreflex sensitivity was determined by cross-spectral analysis of HR and systolic blood pressure (SBP). During the surgery, three tests were used to assess the baroreflex response. The first test simulated a sudden fall in systemic blood pressure by clamping the common carotid artery. The second test simulated a rise in systemic blood pressure by applying pressure by using a rubbing action on the luminal surface of the carotid sinus region. The rub test was performed twice, once with the atheromatous plaque in situ and once when the plaque had been removed. The third test is clamp removal and restoration of blood flow through the carotid sinus. Results: Carotid cross-clamping increased mean ± standard error of the mean SBP from 117 ± 3 mm Hg before clamping to 125 ± 3 mm Hg ( P < .05) at 30 beats after clamping. The first rub test with the plaque in situ decreased SBP from 121 ± 3 mm Hg to 117 ± 3 mm Hg ( P < .01) at 10 beats after the rub test, indicating a functioning baroreceptor reflex. The second rub test increased SBP from 126 ± 3 mm Hg to 128 ± 3 mm Hg ( P < .05). SBP dropped ( P < .01) when unclamping suggesting a selective alteration of the baroreflex sensitivity. The baroreflex sensitivity was significantly reduced 2 days postoperatively when compared to preoperative values ( P < .05). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the act of plaque removal could be associated with a partial disruption of baroreceptor mechanism in the carotid artery. This could affect type I baroreceptors. (J Vasc Surg 2002;36:793-8.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mva.2002.126564
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1067_mva_2002_126564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521402001350</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0741521402001350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-296e28c387661718342af9b8a39de10c97575c904c56fd618d1daf56831d0deb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRsFbXbvMHkt47k3ktS31CwY2uh8nMjYy0iUxisf_elIg7V9_ici6Hw9gtQoWg9Gp_8BUH4BVyJVV9xhYIVpfKgD1nC9A1lpJjfcmuhuEDAFEavWDrOxoppz77MfVdkboi-NyPKRbNtJnaHX0X8Sun7v3vQl30eaIojP3-eM0uWr8b6OZ3l-zt4f5181RuXx6fN-ttGYSAseRWETdBGK0UajSi5r61jfHCRkIIVkstg4U6SNVGhSZi9K1URmCESI1YstX8N-R-GCYz95nT3uejQ3CnAm4q4E4F3FxgIuxM0KR1SJTdEBJ1gWI6ubvYp3_ZH6LCYqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Sigaudo-Roussel, D. ; Evans, D.H. ; Naylor, A.R. ; Panerai, R.B. ; London, N.L. ; Bell, P. ; Gaunt, M.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sigaudo-Roussel, D. ; Evans, D.H. ; Naylor, A.R. ; Panerai, R.B. ; London, N.L. ; Bell, P. ; Gaunt, M.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with a disturbance of the baroreflex control mechanism caused by the surgery in the carotid sinus region. The purpose of this study was to determine if a deterioration in carotid baroreceptors occurs during the surgery. Method: Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were recorded continuously in 60 patients undergoing CEA as well as preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 days and 6 weeks. The baroreflex sensitivity was determined by cross-spectral analysis of HR and systolic blood pressure (SBP). During the surgery, three tests were used to assess the baroreflex response. The first test simulated a sudden fall in systemic blood pressure by clamping the common carotid artery. The second test simulated a rise in systemic blood pressure by applying pressure by using a rubbing action on the luminal surface of the carotid sinus region. The rub test was performed twice, once with the atheromatous plaque in situ and once when the plaque had been removed. The third test is clamp removal and restoration of blood flow through the carotid sinus. Results: Carotid cross-clamping increased mean ± standard error of the mean SBP from 117 ± 3 mm Hg before clamping to 125 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .05) at 30 beats after clamping. The first rub test with the plaque in situ decreased SBP from 121 ± 3 mm Hg to 117 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .01) at 10 beats after the rub test, indicating a functioning baroreceptor reflex. The second rub test increased SBP from 126 ± 3 mm Hg to 128 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .05). SBP dropped ( P &lt; .01) when unclamping suggesting a selective alteration of the baroreflex sensitivity. The baroreflex sensitivity was significantly reduced 2 days postoperatively when compared to preoperative values ( P &lt; .05). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the act of plaque removal could be associated with a partial disruption of baroreceptor mechanism in the carotid artery. This could affect type I baroreceptors. (J Vasc Surg 2002;36:793-8.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.126564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mosby, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2002-10, Vol.36 (4), p.793-798</ispartof><rights>2002 The Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-296e28c387661718342af9b8a39de10c97575c904c56fd618d1daf56831d0deb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sigaudo-Roussel, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, D.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panerai, R.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>London, N.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, M.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><description>Objective: Blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with a disturbance of the baroreflex control mechanism caused by the surgery in the carotid sinus region. The purpose of this study was to determine if a deterioration in carotid baroreceptors occurs during the surgery. Method: Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were recorded continuously in 60 patients undergoing CEA as well as preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 days and 6 weeks. The baroreflex sensitivity was determined by cross-spectral analysis of HR and systolic blood pressure (SBP). During the surgery, three tests were used to assess the baroreflex response. The first test simulated a sudden fall in systemic blood pressure by clamping the common carotid artery. The second test simulated a rise in systemic blood pressure by applying pressure by using a rubbing action on the luminal surface of the carotid sinus region. The rub test was performed twice, once with the atheromatous plaque in situ and once when the plaque had been removed. The third test is clamp removal and restoration of blood flow through the carotid sinus. Results: Carotid cross-clamping increased mean ± standard error of the mean SBP from 117 ± 3 mm Hg before clamping to 125 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .05) at 30 beats after clamping. The first rub test with the plaque in situ decreased SBP from 121 ± 3 mm Hg to 117 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .01) at 10 beats after the rub test, indicating a functioning baroreceptor reflex. The second rub test increased SBP from 126 ± 3 mm Hg to 128 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .05). SBP dropped ( P &lt; .01) when unclamping suggesting a selective alteration of the baroreflex sensitivity. The baroreflex sensitivity was significantly reduced 2 days postoperatively when compared to preoperative values ( P &lt; .05). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the act of plaque removal could be associated with a partial disruption of baroreceptor mechanism in the carotid artery. This could affect type I baroreceptors. (J Vasc Surg 2002;36:793-8.)</description><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRsFbXbvMHkt47k3ktS31CwY2uh8nMjYy0iUxisf_elIg7V9_ici6Hw9gtQoWg9Gp_8BUH4BVyJVV9xhYIVpfKgD1nC9A1lpJjfcmuhuEDAFEavWDrOxoppz77MfVdkboi-NyPKRbNtJnaHX0X8Sun7v3vQl30eaIojP3-eM0uWr8b6OZ3l-zt4f5181RuXx6fN-ttGYSAseRWETdBGK0UajSi5r61jfHCRkIIVkstg4U6SNVGhSZi9K1URmCESI1YstX8N-R-GCYz95nT3uejQ3CnAm4q4E4F3FxgIuxM0KR1SJTdEBJ1gWI6ubvYp3_ZH6LCYqk</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Sigaudo-Roussel, D.</creator><creator>Evans, D.H.</creator><creator>Naylor, A.R.</creator><creator>Panerai, R.B.</creator><creator>London, N.L.</creator><creator>Bell, P.</creator><creator>Gaunt, M.E.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy</title><author>Sigaudo-Roussel, D. ; Evans, D.H. ; Naylor, A.R. ; Panerai, R.B. ; London, N.L. ; Bell, P. ; Gaunt, M.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-296e28c387661718342af9b8a39de10c97575c904c56fd618d1daf56831d0deb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sigaudo-Roussel, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, D.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panerai, R.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>London, N.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, M.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sigaudo-Roussel, D.</au><au>Evans, D.H.</au><au>Naylor, A.R.</au><au>Panerai, R.B.</au><au>London, N.L.</au><au>Bell, P.</au><au>Gaunt, M.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>793-798</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective: Blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with a disturbance of the baroreflex control mechanism caused by the surgery in the carotid sinus region. The purpose of this study was to determine if a deterioration in carotid baroreceptors occurs during the surgery. Method: Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were recorded continuously in 60 patients undergoing CEA as well as preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 days and 6 weeks. The baroreflex sensitivity was determined by cross-spectral analysis of HR and systolic blood pressure (SBP). During the surgery, three tests were used to assess the baroreflex response. The first test simulated a sudden fall in systemic blood pressure by clamping the common carotid artery. The second test simulated a rise in systemic blood pressure by applying pressure by using a rubbing action on the luminal surface of the carotid sinus region. The rub test was performed twice, once with the atheromatous plaque in situ and once when the plaque had been removed. The third test is clamp removal and restoration of blood flow through the carotid sinus. Results: Carotid cross-clamping increased mean ± standard error of the mean SBP from 117 ± 3 mm Hg before clamping to 125 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .05) at 30 beats after clamping. The first rub test with the plaque in situ decreased SBP from 121 ± 3 mm Hg to 117 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .01) at 10 beats after the rub test, indicating a functioning baroreceptor reflex. The second rub test increased SBP from 126 ± 3 mm Hg to 128 ± 3 mm Hg ( P &lt; .05). SBP dropped ( P &lt; .01) when unclamping suggesting a selective alteration of the baroreflex sensitivity. The baroreflex sensitivity was significantly reduced 2 days postoperatively when compared to preoperative values ( P &lt; .05). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the act of plaque removal could be associated with a partial disruption of baroreceptor mechanism in the carotid artery. This could affect type I baroreceptors. (J Vasc Surg 2002;36:793-8.)</abstract><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><doi>10.1067/mva.2002.126564</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2002-10, Vol.36 (4), p.793-798
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1067_mva_2002_126564
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
title Deterioration in carotid baroreflex during carotid endarterectomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deterioration%20in%20carotid%20baroreflex%20during%20carotid%20endarterectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Sigaudo-Roussel,%20D.&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=793-798&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mva.2002.126564&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0741521402001350%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-296e28c387661718342af9b8a39de10c97575c904c56fd618d1daf56831d0deb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true