Loading…

Saccadic Localisation of Random Dot Targets

Saccadic eye movements land at precise places within simple target forms implying that a spatial pooling process operates over attended regions to determine the saccadic endpoint. To study pooling, we used large, unstructured targets and looked for evidence of differential spatial weighting based on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perception (London) 1996-08, Vol.25 (1_suppl), p.101-101
Main Authors: McGowan, J W, Kowler, E, Sharma, A, Chubb, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1e3c1411a4d5cf199952a6ef79fc793c0f38fb621c069e3f5bbad3e8faab82e33
cites
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1_suppl
container_start_page 101
container_title Perception (London)
container_volume 25
creator McGowan, J W
Kowler, E
Sharma, A
Chubb, C
description Saccadic eye movements land at precise places within simple target forms implying that a spatial pooling process operates over attended regions to determine the saccadic endpoint. To study pooling, we used large, unstructured targets and looked for evidence of differential spatial weighting based on local pattern characteristics. Subjects made a saccade to targets composed of 19 dots scattered randomly within a 4 deg diameter region horizontally displaced 3.8 – 4.2 deg to the left or right of initial fixation. Dot intensity was either uniform or variable. Saccadic landing positions were close to the centre-of-gravity (overshooting or under- shooting by 5% – 10% depending on subject, direction and eccentricity). Precision was excellent (SD=10% ecc), although not as good as with single target points (SD=7% ecc). Correlations between the presence of a dot and saccadic landing position showed that all regions of the pattern contributed. Differential weighting of dots according to location (eg near vs far; central vs boundary) did not yield better predictions of the saccadic landing position. However, predictions of the landing position were improved by assigning more weight to higher-intensity dots. Local dot clusters contributed less than would be expected from the contributions of individual dots. Spatial pooling is highly effective over a large region. Saccadic overshoots or undershoots were not due to differential spatial weighting, and may originate after the centre-of-gravity computation. The differential weighting of high-intensity dots and dot clusters demonstrates sensitivity to local characteristics, and implies that the saccadic endpoint may be determined by pooling the activity of units centred on different subregions of the target. The pooling mechanism supports precise saccadic localisation of large, unstructured targets, and accounts for the ease with which we direct saccades to chosen objects in natural scenes.
doi_str_mv 10.1068/v96l0304
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1068_v96l0304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1068_v96l0304</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1068_v96l0304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1e3c1411a4d5cf199952a6ef79fc793c0f38fb621c069e3f5bbad3e8faab82e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj1FLwzAUhYMoWKfgT-iLIEjnvU2aNY8ypxMKgs7ncnubjI6ukaQK_nsr0yefDhw-DucT4hJhjqDL20-je5CgjkSCSpeZyqU8FslUYQag9ak4i3EHgMoUMhE3r8RMbcdp5Zn6LtLY-SH1Ln2hofX79N6P6YbC1o7xXJw46qO9-M2ZeHtYbZbrrHp-fFreVRkj5CpDKxkVIqm2YIfGmCInbd3COF4YyeBk6RqdI4M2VrqiaaiVtnRETZlbKWfi-rDLwccYrKvfQ7en8FUj1D-S9Z_khF4d0EhbW-_8RximZ_-5byejTzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Saccadic Localisation of Random Dot Targets</title><source>SAGE Journals Online Archive</source><creator>McGowan, J W ; Kowler, E ; Sharma, A ; Chubb, C</creator><creatorcontrib>McGowan, J W ; Kowler, E ; Sharma, A ; Chubb, C</creatorcontrib><description>Saccadic eye movements land at precise places within simple target forms implying that a spatial pooling process operates over attended regions to determine the saccadic endpoint. To study pooling, we used large, unstructured targets and looked for evidence of differential spatial weighting based on local pattern characteristics. Subjects made a saccade to targets composed of 19 dots scattered randomly within a 4 deg diameter region horizontally displaced 3.8 – 4.2 deg to the left or right of initial fixation. Dot intensity was either uniform or variable. Saccadic landing positions were close to the centre-of-gravity (overshooting or under- shooting by 5% – 10% depending on subject, direction and eccentricity). Precision was excellent (SD=10% ecc), although not as good as with single target points (SD=7% ecc). Correlations between the presence of a dot and saccadic landing position showed that all regions of the pattern contributed. Differential weighting of dots according to location (eg near vs far; central vs boundary) did not yield better predictions of the saccadic landing position. However, predictions of the landing position were improved by assigning more weight to higher-intensity dots. Local dot clusters contributed less than would be expected from the contributions of individual dots. Spatial pooling is highly effective over a large region. Saccadic overshoots or undershoots were not due to differential spatial weighting, and may originate after the centre-of-gravity computation. The differential weighting of high-intensity dots and dot clusters demonstrates sensitivity to local characteristics, and implies that the saccadic endpoint may be determined by pooling the activity of units centred on different subregions of the target. The pooling mechanism supports precise saccadic localisation of large, unstructured targets, and accounts for the ease with which we direct saccades to chosen objects in natural scenes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1068/v96l0304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Perception (London), 1996-08, Vol.25 (1_suppl), p.101-101</ispartof><rights>1996 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1e3c1411a4d5cf199952a6ef79fc793c0f38fb621c069e3f5bbad3e8faab82e33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/v96l0304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/v96l0304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21860,27924,27925,44857,45245</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGowan, J W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowler, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chubb, C</creatorcontrib><title>Saccadic Localisation of Random Dot Targets</title><title>Perception (London)</title><description>Saccadic eye movements land at precise places within simple target forms implying that a spatial pooling process operates over attended regions to determine the saccadic endpoint. To study pooling, we used large, unstructured targets and looked for evidence of differential spatial weighting based on local pattern characteristics. Subjects made a saccade to targets composed of 19 dots scattered randomly within a 4 deg diameter region horizontally displaced 3.8 – 4.2 deg to the left or right of initial fixation. Dot intensity was either uniform or variable. Saccadic landing positions were close to the centre-of-gravity (overshooting or under- shooting by 5% – 10% depending on subject, direction and eccentricity). Precision was excellent (SD=10% ecc), although not as good as with single target points (SD=7% ecc). Correlations between the presence of a dot and saccadic landing position showed that all regions of the pattern contributed. Differential weighting of dots according to location (eg near vs far; central vs boundary) did not yield better predictions of the saccadic landing position. However, predictions of the landing position were improved by assigning more weight to higher-intensity dots. Local dot clusters contributed less than would be expected from the contributions of individual dots. Spatial pooling is highly effective over a large region. Saccadic overshoots or undershoots were not due to differential spatial weighting, and may originate after the centre-of-gravity computation. The differential weighting of high-intensity dots and dot clusters demonstrates sensitivity to local characteristics, and implies that the saccadic endpoint may be determined by pooling the activity of units centred on different subregions of the target. The pooling mechanism supports precise saccadic localisation of large, unstructured targets, and accounts for the ease with which we direct saccades to chosen objects in natural scenes.</description><issn>0301-0066</issn><issn>1468-4233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj1FLwzAUhYMoWKfgT-iLIEjnvU2aNY8ypxMKgs7ncnubjI6ukaQK_nsr0yefDhw-DucT4hJhjqDL20-je5CgjkSCSpeZyqU8FslUYQag9ak4i3EHgMoUMhE3r8RMbcdp5Zn6LtLY-SH1Ln2hofX79N6P6YbC1o7xXJw46qO9-M2ZeHtYbZbrrHp-fFreVRkj5CpDKxkVIqm2YIfGmCInbd3COF4YyeBk6RqdI4M2VrqiaaiVtnRETZlbKWfi-rDLwccYrKvfQ7en8FUj1D-S9Z_khF4d0EhbW-_8RximZ_-5byejTzs</recordid><startdate>199608</startdate><enddate>199608</enddate><creator>McGowan, J W</creator><creator>Kowler, E</creator><creator>Sharma, A</creator><creator>Chubb, C</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199608</creationdate><title>Saccadic Localisation of Random Dot Targets</title><author>McGowan, J W ; Kowler, E ; Sharma, A ; Chubb, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1e3c1411a4d5cf199952a6ef79fc793c0f38fb621c069e3f5bbad3e8faab82e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGowan, J W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowler, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chubb, C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGowan, J W</au><au>Kowler, E</au><au>Sharma, A</au><au>Chubb, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Saccadic Localisation of Random Dot Targets</atitle><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle><date>1996-08</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1_suppl</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>101-101</pages><issn>0301-0066</issn><eissn>1468-4233</eissn><abstract>Saccadic eye movements land at precise places within simple target forms implying that a spatial pooling process operates over attended regions to determine the saccadic endpoint. To study pooling, we used large, unstructured targets and looked for evidence of differential spatial weighting based on local pattern characteristics. Subjects made a saccade to targets composed of 19 dots scattered randomly within a 4 deg diameter region horizontally displaced 3.8 – 4.2 deg to the left or right of initial fixation. Dot intensity was either uniform or variable. Saccadic landing positions were close to the centre-of-gravity (overshooting or under- shooting by 5% – 10% depending on subject, direction and eccentricity). Precision was excellent (SD=10% ecc), although not as good as with single target points (SD=7% ecc). Correlations between the presence of a dot and saccadic landing position showed that all regions of the pattern contributed. Differential weighting of dots according to location (eg near vs far; central vs boundary) did not yield better predictions of the saccadic landing position. However, predictions of the landing position were improved by assigning more weight to higher-intensity dots. Local dot clusters contributed less than would be expected from the contributions of individual dots. Spatial pooling is highly effective over a large region. Saccadic overshoots or undershoots were not due to differential spatial weighting, and may originate after the centre-of-gravity computation. The differential weighting of high-intensity dots and dot clusters demonstrates sensitivity to local characteristics, and implies that the saccadic endpoint may be determined by pooling the activity of units centred on different subregions of the target. The pooling mechanism supports precise saccadic localisation of large, unstructured targets, and accounts for the ease with which we direct saccades to chosen objects in natural scenes.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1068/v96l0304</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0066
ispartof Perception (London), 1996-08, Vol.25 (1_suppl), p.101-101
issn 0301-0066
1468-4233
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1068_v96l0304
source SAGE Journals Online Archive
title Saccadic Localisation of Random Dot Targets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A43%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Saccadic%20Localisation%20of%20Random%20Dot%20Targets&rft.jtitle=Perception%20(London)&rft.au=McGowan,%20J%20W&rft.date=1996-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1_suppl&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=101-101&rft.issn=0301-0066&rft.eissn=1468-4233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1068/v96l0304&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1068_v96l0304%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1e3c1411a4d5cf199952a6ef79fc793c0f38fb621c069e3f5bbad3e8faab82e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1068_v96l0304&rfr_iscdi=true