Loading…

Mutagenesis and Modeling of the Neurotensin Receptor NTR1

The two neurotensin receptor subtypes known to date, NTR1 and NTR2, belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven putative transmembrane domains (TM). SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist, is selective for the NTR1. In the present study we attempted, through mutagenesis and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of biological chemistry 1998-06, Vol.273 (26), p.16351-16357
Main Authors: Catherine Labbé-JulliÃ, Séverine Barroso, Delphine Nicolas-Etève, Jean-Louis Reversat, Jean-Marie Botto, Jean Mazella, Jean-Marie Bernassau, Patrick Kitabgi
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13
container_end_page 16357
container_issue 26
container_start_page 16351
container_title The Journal of biological chemistry
container_volume 273
creator Catherine Labbé-JulliÃ
Séverine Barroso
Delphine Nicolas-Etève
Jean-Louis Reversat
Jean-Marie Botto
Jean Mazella
Jean-Marie Bernassau
Patrick Kitabgi
description The two neurotensin receptor subtypes known to date, NTR1 and NTR2, belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven putative transmembrane domains (TM). SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist, is selective for the NTR1. In the present study we attempted, through mutagenesis and computer-assisted modeling, to identify residues in the rat NTR1 that are involved in antagonist binding and to provide a tentative molecular model of the SR 48692 binding site. The seven putative TMs of the NTR1 were defined by sequence comparison and alignment of bovine rhodopsin and G-protein-coupled receptors. Thirty-five amino acid residues within or flanking the TMs were mutated to alanine. Additional mutations were performed for basic residues. The wild type and mutant receptors were expressed in COS M6 cells and tested for their ability to bind 125 I-NT and [ 3 H]SR 48692. A tridimensional model of the SR 48692 binding site was constructed using frog rhodopsin as a template. SR 48692 was docked into the receptor, taking into account the mutagenesis data for orienting the antagonist. The model shows that the antagonist binding pocket lies near the extracellular side of the transmembrane helices within the first two helical turns. The data identify one residue in TM 4, three in TM 6, and four in TM 7 that are involved in SR 48692 binding. Two of these residues, Arg 327 in TM 6 and Tyr 351 in TM 7, play a key role in antagonist/receptor interactions. The former appears to form an ionic link with the carboxylic group of SR 48692, as further supported by structure-activity studies using SR 48692 analogs. The data also show that the agonist and antagonist binding sites in the rNTR1 are different and help formulate hypotheses as to the structural basis for the selectivity of SR 48692 toward the NTR1 and NTR2.
doi_str_mv 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16351
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>highwire_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1074_jbc_273_26_16351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>273_26_16351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkD1PwzAYhC0EKqWwM2ZgTfBrx3Y8ooovqS1SVSQ2y3FeJ6napLJTIf49gbJwy91wd8NDyC3QDKjK77ely5jiGZMZSC7gjEyBFjwd48c5mVLKINVMFJfkKsYtHZVrmJCJlpxJXUyJXh4HW2OHsY2J7apk2Ve4a7s66X0yNJis8Bj6AbvYdskaHR6GPiSrzRquyYW3u4g3fz4j70-Pm_lLunh7fp0_LFIHQkPKuWeMKyksCi9y0N7xMqdMWKUtUxI8Q-UKjbqQOVSsBOWrymm0Er2sgM8IPf260McY0JtDaPc2fBmg5geCGSGYEYJh0vxCGCd3p0nT1s1nG9CUbe8a3P-vfQPIHlkp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mutagenesis and Modeling of the Neurotensin Receptor NTR1</title><source>ScienceDirect - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Catherine Labbé-Jullià ; Séverine Barroso ; Delphine Nicolas-Etève ; Jean-Louis Reversat ; Jean-Marie Botto ; Jean Mazella ; Jean-Marie Bernassau ; Patrick Kitabgi</creator><creatorcontrib>Catherine Labbé-Jullià ; Séverine Barroso ; Delphine Nicolas-Etève ; Jean-Louis Reversat ; Jean-Marie Botto ; Jean Mazella ; Jean-Marie Bernassau ; Patrick Kitabgi</creatorcontrib><description>The two neurotensin receptor subtypes known to date, NTR1 and NTR2, belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven putative transmembrane domains (TM). SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist, is selective for the NTR1. In the present study we attempted, through mutagenesis and computer-assisted modeling, to identify residues in the rat NTR1 that are involved in antagonist binding and to provide a tentative molecular model of the SR 48692 binding site. The seven putative TMs of the NTR1 were defined by sequence comparison and alignment of bovine rhodopsin and G-protein-coupled receptors. Thirty-five amino acid residues within or flanking the TMs were mutated to alanine. Additional mutations were performed for basic residues. The wild type and mutant receptors were expressed in COS M6 cells and tested for their ability to bind 125 I-NT and [ 3 H]SR 48692. A tridimensional model of the SR 48692 binding site was constructed using frog rhodopsin as a template. SR 48692 was docked into the receptor, taking into account the mutagenesis data for orienting the antagonist. The model shows that the antagonist binding pocket lies near the extracellular side of the transmembrane helices within the first two helical turns. The data identify one residue in TM 4, three in TM 6, and four in TM 7 that are involved in SR 48692 binding. Two of these residues, Arg 327 in TM 6 and Tyr 351 in TM 7, play a key role in antagonist/receptor interactions. The former appears to form an ionic link with the carboxylic group of SR 48692, as further supported by structure-activity studies using SR 48692 analogs. The data also show that the agonist and antagonist binding sites in the rNTR1 are different and help formulate hypotheses as to the structural basis for the selectivity of SR 48692 toward the NTR1 and NTR2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1083-351X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16351</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9632698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of biological chemistry, 1998-06, Vol.273 (26), p.16351-16357</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catherine Labbé-JulliÃ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Séverine Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delphine Nicolas-Etève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Louis Reversat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Marie Botto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean Mazella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Marie Bernassau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick Kitabgi</creatorcontrib><title>Mutagenesis and Modeling of the Neurotensin Receptor NTR1</title><title>The Journal of biological chemistry</title><description>The two neurotensin receptor subtypes known to date, NTR1 and NTR2, belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven putative transmembrane domains (TM). SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist, is selective for the NTR1. In the present study we attempted, through mutagenesis and computer-assisted modeling, to identify residues in the rat NTR1 that are involved in antagonist binding and to provide a tentative molecular model of the SR 48692 binding site. The seven putative TMs of the NTR1 were defined by sequence comparison and alignment of bovine rhodopsin and G-protein-coupled receptors. Thirty-five amino acid residues within or flanking the TMs were mutated to alanine. Additional mutations were performed for basic residues. The wild type and mutant receptors were expressed in COS M6 cells and tested for their ability to bind 125 I-NT and [ 3 H]SR 48692. A tridimensional model of the SR 48692 binding site was constructed using frog rhodopsin as a template. SR 48692 was docked into the receptor, taking into account the mutagenesis data for orienting the antagonist. The model shows that the antagonist binding pocket lies near the extracellular side of the transmembrane helices within the first two helical turns. The data identify one residue in TM 4, three in TM 6, and four in TM 7 that are involved in SR 48692 binding. Two of these residues, Arg 327 in TM 6 and Tyr 351 in TM 7, play a key role in antagonist/receptor interactions. The former appears to form an ionic link with the carboxylic group of SR 48692, as further supported by structure-activity studies using SR 48692 analogs. The data also show that the agonist and antagonist binding sites in the rNTR1 are different and help formulate hypotheses as to the structural basis for the selectivity of SR 48692 toward the NTR1 and NTR2.</description><issn>0021-9258</issn><issn>1083-351X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkD1PwzAYhC0EKqWwM2ZgTfBrx3Y8ooovqS1SVSQ2y3FeJ6napLJTIf49gbJwy91wd8NDyC3QDKjK77ely5jiGZMZSC7gjEyBFjwd48c5mVLKINVMFJfkKsYtHZVrmJCJlpxJXUyJXh4HW2OHsY2J7apk2Ve4a7s66X0yNJis8Bj6AbvYdskaHR6GPiSrzRquyYW3u4g3fz4j70-Pm_lLunh7fp0_LFIHQkPKuWeMKyksCi9y0N7xMqdMWKUtUxI8Q-UKjbqQOVSsBOWrymm0Er2sgM8IPf260McY0JtDaPc2fBmg5geCGSGYEYJh0vxCGCd3p0nT1s1nG9CUbe8a3P-vfQPIHlkp</recordid><startdate>19980626</startdate><enddate>19980626</enddate><creator>Catherine Labbé-JulliÃ</creator><creator>Séverine Barroso</creator><creator>Delphine Nicolas-Etève</creator><creator>Jean-Louis Reversat</creator><creator>Jean-Marie Botto</creator><creator>Jean Mazella</creator><creator>Jean-Marie Bernassau</creator><creator>Patrick Kitabgi</creator><general>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980626</creationdate><title>Mutagenesis and Modeling of the Neurotensin Receptor NTR1</title><author>Catherine Labbé-Jullià ; Séverine Barroso ; Delphine Nicolas-Etève ; Jean-Louis Reversat ; Jean-Marie Botto ; Jean Mazella ; Jean-Marie Bernassau ; Patrick Kitabgi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catherine Labbé-JulliÃ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Séverine Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delphine Nicolas-Etève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Louis Reversat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Marie Botto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean Mazella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Marie Bernassau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick Kitabgi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of biological chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catherine Labbé-JulliÃ</au><au>Séverine Barroso</au><au>Delphine Nicolas-Etève</au><au>Jean-Louis Reversat</au><au>Jean-Marie Botto</au><au>Jean Mazella</au><au>Jean-Marie Bernassau</au><au>Patrick Kitabgi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mutagenesis and Modeling of the Neurotensin Receptor NTR1</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of biological chemistry</jtitle><date>1998-06-26</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>273</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>16351</spage><epage>16357</epage><pages>16351-16357</pages><issn>0021-9258</issn><eissn>1083-351X</eissn><abstract>The two neurotensin receptor subtypes known to date, NTR1 and NTR2, belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven putative transmembrane domains (TM). SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist, is selective for the NTR1. In the present study we attempted, through mutagenesis and computer-assisted modeling, to identify residues in the rat NTR1 that are involved in antagonist binding and to provide a tentative molecular model of the SR 48692 binding site. The seven putative TMs of the NTR1 were defined by sequence comparison and alignment of bovine rhodopsin and G-protein-coupled receptors. Thirty-five amino acid residues within or flanking the TMs were mutated to alanine. Additional mutations were performed for basic residues. The wild type and mutant receptors were expressed in COS M6 cells and tested for their ability to bind 125 I-NT and [ 3 H]SR 48692. A tridimensional model of the SR 48692 binding site was constructed using frog rhodopsin as a template. SR 48692 was docked into the receptor, taking into account the mutagenesis data for orienting the antagonist. The model shows that the antagonist binding pocket lies near the extracellular side of the transmembrane helices within the first two helical turns. The data identify one residue in TM 4, three in TM 6, and four in TM 7 that are involved in SR 48692 binding. Two of these residues, Arg 327 in TM 6 and Tyr 351 in TM 7, play a key role in antagonist/receptor interactions. The former appears to form an ionic link with the carboxylic group of SR 48692, as further supported by structure-activity studies using SR 48692 analogs. The data also show that the agonist and antagonist binding sites in the rNTR1 are different and help formulate hypotheses as to the structural basis for the selectivity of SR 48692 toward the NTR1 and NTR2.</abstract><pub>American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</pub><pmid>9632698</pmid><doi>10.1074/jbc.273.26.16351</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9258
ispartof The Journal of biological chemistry, 1998-06, Vol.273 (26), p.16351-16357
issn 0021-9258
1083-351X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1074_jbc_273_26_16351
source ScienceDirect - Connect here FIRST to enable access
title Mutagenesis and Modeling of the Neurotensin Receptor NTR1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A31%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-highwire_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutagenesis%20and%20Modeling%20of%20the%20Neurotensin%20Receptor%20NTR1&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20biological%20chemistry&rft.au=Catherine%20Labb%C3%83%C2%A9-Julli%C3%83&rft.date=1998-06-26&rft.volume=273&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=16351&rft.epage=16357&rft.pages=16351-16357&rft.issn=0021-9258&rft.eissn=1083-351X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1074/jbc.273.26.16351&rft_dat=%3Chighwire_cross%3E273_26_16351%3C/highwire_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1591-33f223765ae5f5419fc3b4025a79a2761f2e7c89e98641d2b17fddc9ea6ef6d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9632698&rfr_iscdi=true