Evaluating UV-B effects and EDU protection in cucumber leaves using fluorescence images and fluorescence emission spectra

• Published in: Journal of plant physiology 2001, Vol.158 (1), p.41-53
• Main Authors: Krizek, Donald T., Middleton, Elisabeth M., Sandhu, Ravinder K., Kim, Moon S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Blue, green, red, and far-red fluorescence; cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.); EDU; fluorescence imaging; fluorescence ratios red/green, blue/far-red, UV/blue, far-red/red; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Metabolism; Photosynthesis, respiration. Anabolism, catabolism; Plant physiology and development; plant stress; UV-B
• ISSN: 0176-1617; 1618-1328
• DOI: 10.1078/0176-1617-00226

A newly developed laboratory fluorescence imaging system was used to obtain fluorescence images (FImage) of freshly excised cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) leaves in spectral bands centered in the blue (F450), green (F550), red (F680), and far-red (F730) spectral regions that resulted from a broad-band (300-400 nm) excitation source centered at 360 nm. Means of relative fluorescence intensities (RFI) from these spectral fluorescence images were compared with spectral fluorescence emission data obtained from excitation wavelengths at 280 nm (280EX, 300-550 nm) and 380 nm (380EX, 400-800 nm) of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) extracts from these leaves. All three fluorescence data types (FImage, 280EX, 380EX) were used to assess ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280-320 nm) induced physiological changes and the possible use of N-[2-(2-oxo-1-imidazolidinyl) ethyl]-N′-phenylurea (EDU or ethylenediurea) as a chemical protectant against UV-B damage. Plants exhibited well known foliar growth and pigment responses to UV-B exposure (e.g., increased UV-B absorbing compounds and decreased leaf area, chlorophyll a content; and and lower chlorophyll a/b and chlorophyll/carotenoid pigment ratios). Since EDU alone had no effect on foliar variables, there was no evidence that EDU afforded protection against UV-B. Instead, EDU augmented some UV-B effects when provided in conjunction with UV-B irradiation (e.g., reductions in the chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio, total photosynthetic pigments, and chlorophyll b content).Relative fluorescence intensities (RFI) in the longer visible wavelengths (green, red, and far-red) were uncorrelated for comparisons between the FImage and 380EX data sets. However, blue and green RFI were significantly correlated (0.8≫r≫0.6; P ≤0.002) for comparisons between FImage and 280EX data sets. UV-B treatment caused an increase in blue RFI (e.g., F450) in both images and 280EX measurements. One explanation is that the UV-B excitation of both 280EX and FImage stimulates processes that produce excess blue fluorescence. The molecules that produce the excess blue fluorescence in both the 280EX and the Fimage data are different electron transfer agents that operate in parallel. For FImage, the UV excitation penetrates leaf surface layers to stimulate fluorescence from compounds in mesophyll and epidermal tissues (as occurs for the extracts of leaf discs), whereas emissions captured at longer, less energetic wavelengths, were primarily from the epidermal layer. UV-B irradiated