Loading…

Does public scrutiny on corporate tax decisions affect directors? Effects of responsible (irresponsible) corporate tax practices on director reputation

In 2004, the Citizens of Tax Justice (CTJ) released a report that significantly raised public awareness of corporate tax avoidance practices in the companies that it scrutinised in the study. Using a six-year period straddling the CTJ event, we compare over time changes in external board seats held...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounting and business research 2024-02, Vol.54 (2), p.168-189
Main Authors: Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan), Ke, Yun, Wu, Qiang, Zhang, Hao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3
container_end_page 189
container_issue 2
container_start_page 168
container_title Accounting and business research
container_volume 54
creator Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan)
Ke, Yun
Wu, Qiang
Zhang, Hao
description In 2004, the Citizens of Tax Justice (CTJ) released a report that significantly raised public awareness of corporate tax avoidance practices in the companies that it scrutinised in the study. Using a six-year period straddling the CTJ event, we compare over time changes in external board seats held by incumbent directors serving scrutinised firms against those of their counterparts serving control firms with comparable tax practices but that were not scrutinised in the CTJ study. Incumbent directors in scrutinised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices gained more external board seats after the CTJ event than did board members in control firms. However, directors in scrutinised firms with aggressive tax avoidance practices neither gained nor lost more external board seats after the CTJ event than did directors in control firms. These findings provide little evidence that constituents in the corporate sector overwhelmingly favour tax minimisation practices as acceptable practices of conducting business operations. Rather, they provide evidence that corporate constituents, like their social peers, are somewhat attuned to the expectation for socially responsible tax practices. Lastly, we find that directors in scruitised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices are more likely to gain board seats from like-minded firms with responsible tax practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00014788.2022.2112549
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00014788_2022_2112549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2927756777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhYMoWKuPIATc6GJqkk5mMiuVWn-g4EbXIZNJIGU6GW8yaJ_E1zW1LYgLV5d7-c45cA9C55RMKBHkmhBC81KICSOMTRiljOfVARoxyqssZwU5RKMNk22gY3QSwjKtgtBqhL7uvQm4H-rWaRw0DNF1a-w7rD30HlQ0OKpP3BjtgvNdwMpaoyNuHKThIdzg-c8lYG8xmNAnyNWtwZcOfq1Xfwx7UDo6nbJT1t4s6fshqpiCTtGRVW0wZ7s5Rm8P89fZU7Z4eXye3S0yPa14zErFc6FZZbWtiC2tsIryaUEpSSdS5YZZIWrDjBEF4UoVmtU1qbniTUNMU0_H6GLr24N_H0yIcukH6FKkZBUrS16UZZkovqU0-BDAWNmDWylYS0rkpgO570BuOpC7DpLudqtznfWwUh8e2kZGtW49WFBdeqqc_m_xDQn_klY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927756777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does public scrutiny on corporate tax decisions affect directors? Effects of responsible (irresponsible) corporate tax practices on director reputation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan) ; Ke, Yun ; Wu, Qiang ; Zhang, Hao</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan) ; Ke, Yun ; Wu, Qiang ; Zhang, Hao</creatorcontrib><description>In 2004, the Citizens of Tax Justice (CTJ) released a report that significantly raised public awareness of corporate tax avoidance practices in the companies that it scrutinised in the study. Using a six-year period straddling the CTJ event, we compare over time changes in external board seats held by incumbent directors serving scrutinised firms against those of their counterparts serving control firms with comparable tax practices but that were not scrutinised in the CTJ study. Incumbent directors in scrutinised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices gained more external board seats after the CTJ event than did board members in control firms. However, directors in scrutinised firms with aggressive tax avoidance practices neither gained nor lost more external board seats after the CTJ event than did directors in control firms. These findings provide little evidence that constituents in the corporate sector overwhelmingly favour tax minimisation practices as acceptable practices of conducting business operations. Rather, they provide evidence that corporate constituents, like their social peers, are somewhat attuned to the expectation for socially responsible tax practices. Lastly, we find that directors in scruitised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices are more likely to gain board seats from like-minded firms with responsible tax practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-4260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2022.2112549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Companies ; corporate social responsibility ; Corporate tax avoidance ; Corporate taxes ; director reputation ; Directors ; Incumbency ; labour market for directors ; news media coverage ; Perceptions ; Scrutiny ; social norm ; Social responsibility ; Tax avoidance ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Accounting and business research, 2024-02, Vol.54 (2), p.168-189</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4017-6524</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hao</creatorcontrib><title>Does public scrutiny on corporate tax decisions affect directors? Effects of responsible (irresponsible) corporate tax practices on director reputation</title><title>Accounting and business research</title><description>In 2004, the Citizens of Tax Justice (CTJ) released a report that significantly raised public awareness of corporate tax avoidance practices in the companies that it scrutinised in the study. Using a six-year period straddling the CTJ event, we compare over time changes in external board seats held by incumbent directors serving scrutinised firms against those of their counterparts serving control firms with comparable tax practices but that were not scrutinised in the CTJ study. Incumbent directors in scrutinised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices gained more external board seats after the CTJ event than did board members in control firms. However, directors in scrutinised firms with aggressive tax avoidance practices neither gained nor lost more external board seats after the CTJ event than did directors in control firms. These findings provide little evidence that constituents in the corporate sector overwhelmingly favour tax minimisation practices as acceptable practices of conducting business operations. Rather, they provide evidence that corporate constituents, like their social peers, are somewhat attuned to the expectation for socially responsible tax practices. Lastly, we find that directors in scruitised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices are more likely to gain board seats from like-minded firms with responsible tax practices.</description><subject>Companies</subject><subject>corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Corporate tax avoidance</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>director reputation</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Incumbency</subject><subject>labour market for directors</subject><subject>news media coverage</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><subject>social norm</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Tax avoidance</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0001-4788</issn><issn>2159-4260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhYMoWKuPIATc6GJqkk5mMiuVWn-g4EbXIZNJIGU6GW8yaJ_E1zW1LYgLV5d7-c45cA9C55RMKBHkmhBC81KICSOMTRiljOfVARoxyqssZwU5RKMNk22gY3QSwjKtgtBqhL7uvQm4H-rWaRw0DNF1a-w7rD30HlQ0OKpP3BjtgvNdwMpaoyNuHKThIdzg-c8lYG8xmNAnyNWtwZcOfq1Xfwx7UDo6nbJT1t4s6fshqpiCTtGRVW0wZ7s5Rm8P89fZU7Z4eXye3S0yPa14zErFc6FZZbWtiC2tsIryaUEpSSdS5YZZIWrDjBEF4UoVmtU1qbniTUNMU0_H6GLr24N_H0yIcukH6FKkZBUrS16UZZkovqU0-BDAWNmDWylYS0rkpgO570BuOpC7DpLudqtznfWwUh8e2kZGtW49WFBdeqqc_m_xDQn_klY</recordid><startdate>20240223</startdate><enddate>20240223</enddate><creator>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan)</creator><creator>Ke, Yun</creator><creator>Wu, Qiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Hao</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4017-6524</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240223</creationdate><title>Does public scrutiny on corporate tax decisions affect directors? Effects of responsible (irresponsible) corporate tax practices on director reputation</title><author>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan) ; Ke, Yun ; Wu, Qiang ; Zhang, Hao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Companies</topic><topic>corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Corporate tax avoidance</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>director reputation</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Incumbency</topic><topic>labour market for directors</topic><topic>news media coverage</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><topic>social norm</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Tax avoidance</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Accounting and business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoi, Chun Keung (Stan)</au><au>Ke, Yun</au><au>Wu, Qiang</au><au>Zhang, Hao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does public scrutiny on corporate tax decisions affect directors? Effects of responsible (irresponsible) corporate tax practices on director reputation</atitle><jtitle>Accounting and business research</jtitle><date>2024-02-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>168-189</pages><issn>0001-4788</issn><eissn>2159-4260</eissn><abstract>In 2004, the Citizens of Tax Justice (CTJ) released a report that significantly raised public awareness of corporate tax avoidance practices in the companies that it scrutinised in the study. Using a six-year period straddling the CTJ event, we compare over time changes in external board seats held by incumbent directors serving scrutinised firms against those of their counterparts serving control firms with comparable tax practices but that were not scrutinised in the CTJ study. Incumbent directors in scrutinised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices gained more external board seats after the CTJ event than did board members in control firms. However, directors in scrutinised firms with aggressive tax avoidance practices neither gained nor lost more external board seats after the CTJ event than did directors in control firms. These findings provide little evidence that constituents in the corporate sector overwhelmingly favour tax minimisation practices as acceptable practices of conducting business operations. Rather, they provide evidence that corporate constituents, like their social peers, are somewhat attuned to the expectation for socially responsible tax practices. Lastly, we find that directors in scruitised firms with minimal tax avoidance practices are more likely to gain board seats from like-minded firms with responsible tax practices.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00014788.2022.2112549</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4017-6524</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4788
ispartof Accounting and business research, 2024-02, Vol.54 (2), p.168-189
issn 0001-4788
2159-4260
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00014788_2022_2112549
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Companies
corporate social responsibility
Corporate tax avoidance
Corporate taxes
director reputation
Directors
Incumbency
labour market for directors
news media coverage
Perceptions
Scrutiny
social norm
Social responsibility
Tax avoidance
Taxation
title Does public scrutiny on corporate tax decisions affect directors? Effects of responsible (irresponsible) corporate tax practices on director reputation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A36%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20public%20scrutiny%20on%20corporate%20tax%20decisions%20affect%20directors?%20Effects%20of%20responsible%20(irresponsible)%20corporate%20tax%20practices%20on%20director%20reputation&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20and%20business%20research&rft.au=Hoi,%20Chun%20Keung%20(Stan)&rft.date=2024-02-23&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=168-189&rft.issn=0001-4788&rft.eissn=2159-4260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00014788.2022.2112549&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927756777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7a548c29fcf90f7f8fa15361109fc094e2f88be2ee8605aa6c2bb0b5a5dd0edb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927756777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true