Loading…

Zinc deficiency in selected cultivars of wheat and barley as tested in solution culture

The relative zinc (Zn) efficiencies of 33 wheat and 3 barley cultivars were determined by growing them in chelate-buffered culture solutions. Zn efficiency, determined by growth in a Zn-deficient solution relative to that in a medium containing an adequate concentration of Zn, was found to vary betw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communications in soil science and plant analysis 2006-06, Vol.37 (11-12), p.1703-1721
Main Authors: Imtiaz, M, Alloway, B.J, Khan, P, Memon, M.Y, Siddiqui, S.U.H, Aslam, M, Shah, S.K.H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223
container_end_page 1721
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 1703
container_title Communications in soil science and plant analysis
container_volume 37
creator Imtiaz, M
Alloway, B.J
Khan, P
Memon, M.Y
Siddiqui, S.U.H
Aslam, M
Shah, S.K.H
description The relative zinc (Zn) efficiencies of 33 wheat and 3 barley cultivars were determined by growing them in chelate-buffered culture solutions. Zn efficiency, determined by growth in a Zn-deficient solution relative to that in a medium containing an adequate concentration of Zn, was found to vary between 10% and 63% among the cultivars tested. Out of the 36 cultivars tested, 12 proved to be Zn efficient, 10 were Zn inefficient, and the remaining 14 varieties were classed as intermediate. The most Zn-efficient cultivars included Bakhtawar, Gatcher S61, Wilgoyne, and Madrigal, and the most Zn inefficient included Durati, Songlen, Excalibur, and Chakwal-86. Zn-efficient cultivars accumulated greater amounts of Zn in their shoots than inefficient cultivars, but the correlation between shoot Zn and shoot dry matter production was poor. All the cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and phosphorus (P) at deficient levels of Zn, compared with adequate Zn concentrations. The Zn-inefficient cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of these other elements compared to efficient cultivars.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00103620600710454
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00103620600710454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301091470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LBDEMhosouK7-AE_24nE0_ZiZHfAi4hcseFARvAzZNtXKOCNtV91_b9dVPAh6CiHPE5KXsV0BBwImcAggQFUSKoBagC71GhuJUslCalGts9FyXmRAb7KtGJ9y29QgR-zu3veGW3LeeOrNgvueR-rIJLLczLvkXzFEPjj-9kiYOPaWzzB0tOAYeaK45JbO0M2TH_pPZx5om2047CLtfNUxuz07vTm5KKZX55cnx9PCaIBUoDC1rTXSpJGVNFgJC2iUcwRqRpif0SQqNFY2laVGl8o2EmdlM3ElzaRUYyZWe00YYgzk2pfgnzEsWgHtMpn2VzLZ2V85LxgNdi5gb3z8EesmhyNF5uoV53s3hGd8G0Jn24SLbgjf0q_tbXpP2Tz611R_Hbi30h0OLT6ETN9eSxAqk43QNagPEp6SIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zinc deficiency in selected cultivars of wheat and barley as tested in solution culture</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Imtiaz, M ; Alloway, B.J ; Khan, P ; Memon, M.Y ; Siddiqui, S.U.H ; Aslam, M ; Shah, S.K.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Imtiaz, M ; Alloway, B.J ; Khan, P ; Memon, M.Y ; Siddiqui, S.U.H ; Aslam, M ; Shah, S.K.H</creatorcontrib><description>The relative zinc (Zn) efficiencies of 33 wheat and 3 barley cultivars were determined by growing them in chelate-buffered culture solutions. Zn efficiency, determined by growth in a Zn-deficient solution relative to that in a medium containing an adequate concentration of Zn, was found to vary between 10% and 63% among the cultivars tested. Out of the 36 cultivars tested, 12 proved to be Zn efficient, 10 were Zn inefficient, and the remaining 14 varieties were classed as intermediate. The most Zn-efficient cultivars included Bakhtawar, Gatcher S61, Wilgoyne, and Madrigal, and the most Zn inefficient included Durati, Songlen, Excalibur, and Chakwal-86. Zn-efficient cultivars accumulated greater amounts of Zn in their shoots than inefficient cultivars, but the correlation between shoot Zn and shoot dry matter production was poor. All the cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and phosphorus (P) at deficient levels of Zn, compared with adequate Zn concentrations. The Zn-inefficient cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of these other elements compared to efficient cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00103620600710454</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSOSA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Barley ; Biological and medical sciences ; copper ; cultivars ; deficiency ; dry matter accumulation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hordeum vulgare ; iron ; manganese ; nutrient deficiencies ; nutrient retention ; nutrient solutions ; nutrient use efficiency ; nutrient-nutrient interactions ; phosphorus ; plant nutrition ; shoots ; Triticum aestivum ; wheat ; zinc ; zinc efficiency</subject><ispartof>Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2006-06, Vol.37 (11-12), p.1703-1721</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17919721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imtiaz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alloway, B.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memon, M.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, S.U.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, S.K.H</creatorcontrib><title>Zinc deficiency in selected cultivars of wheat and barley as tested in solution culture</title><title>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</title><description>The relative zinc (Zn) efficiencies of 33 wheat and 3 barley cultivars were determined by growing them in chelate-buffered culture solutions. Zn efficiency, determined by growth in a Zn-deficient solution relative to that in a medium containing an adequate concentration of Zn, was found to vary between 10% and 63% among the cultivars tested. Out of the 36 cultivars tested, 12 proved to be Zn efficient, 10 were Zn inefficient, and the remaining 14 varieties were classed as intermediate. The most Zn-efficient cultivars included Bakhtawar, Gatcher S61, Wilgoyne, and Madrigal, and the most Zn inefficient included Durati, Songlen, Excalibur, and Chakwal-86. Zn-efficient cultivars accumulated greater amounts of Zn in their shoots than inefficient cultivars, but the correlation between shoot Zn and shoot dry matter production was poor. All the cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and phosphorus (P) at deficient levels of Zn, compared with adequate Zn concentrations. The Zn-inefficient cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of these other elements compared to efficient cultivars.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>copper</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>deficiency</subject><subject>dry matter accumulation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>iron</subject><subject>manganese</subject><subject>nutrient deficiencies</subject><subject>nutrient retention</subject><subject>nutrient solutions</subject><subject>nutrient use efficiency</subject><subject>nutrient-nutrient interactions</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>plant nutrition</subject><subject>shoots</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>wheat</subject><subject>zinc</subject><subject>zinc efficiency</subject><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LBDEMhosouK7-AE_24nE0_ZiZHfAi4hcseFARvAzZNtXKOCNtV91_b9dVPAh6CiHPE5KXsV0BBwImcAggQFUSKoBagC71GhuJUslCalGts9FyXmRAb7KtGJ9y29QgR-zu3veGW3LeeOrNgvueR-rIJLLczLvkXzFEPjj-9kiYOPaWzzB0tOAYeaK45JbO0M2TH_pPZx5om2047CLtfNUxuz07vTm5KKZX55cnx9PCaIBUoDC1rTXSpJGVNFgJC2iUcwRqRpif0SQqNFY2laVGl8o2EmdlM3ElzaRUYyZWe00YYgzk2pfgnzEsWgHtMpn2VzLZ2V85LxgNdi5gb3z8EesmhyNF5uoV53s3hGd8G0Jn24SLbgjf0q_tbXpP2Tz611R_Hbi30h0OLT6ETN9eSxAqk43QNagPEp6SIw</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Imtiaz, M</creator><creator>Alloway, B.J</creator><creator>Khan, P</creator><creator>Memon, M.Y</creator><creator>Siddiqui, S.U.H</creator><creator>Aslam, M</creator><creator>Shah, S.K.H</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Zinc deficiency in selected cultivars of wheat and barley as tested in solution culture</title><author>Imtiaz, M ; Alloway, B.J ; Khan, P ; Memon, M.Y ; Siddiqui, S.U.H ; Aslam, M ; Shah, S.K.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>copper</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>deficiency</topic><topic>dry matter accumulation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>iron</topic><topic>manganese</topic><topic>nutrient deficiencies</topic><topic>nutrient retention</topic><topic>nutrient solutions</topic><topic>nutrient use efficiency</topic><topic>nutrient-nutrient interactions</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>plant nutrition</topic><topic>shoots</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>wheat</topic><topic>zinc</topic><topic>zinc efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imtiaz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alloway, B.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memon, M.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, S.U.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, S.K.H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imtiaz, M</au><au>Alloway, B.J</au><au>Khan, P</au><au>Memon, M.Y</au><au>Siddiqui, S.U.H</au><au>Aslam, M</au><au>Shah, S.K.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zinc deficiency in selected cultivars of wheat and barley as tested in solution culture</atitle><jtitle>Communications in soil science and plant analysis</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>1703</spage><epage>1721</epage><pages>1703-1721</pages><issn>0010-3624</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><coden>CSOSA2</coden><abstract>The relative zinc (Zn) efficiencies of 33 wheat and 3 barley cultivars were determined by growing them in chelate-buffered culture solutions. Zn efficiency, determined by growth in a Zn-deficient solution relative to that in a medium containing an adequate concentration of Zn, was found to vary between 10% and 63% among the cultivars tested. Out of the 36 cultivars tested, 12 proved to be Zn efficient, 10 were Zn inefficient, and the remaining 14 varieties were classed as intermediate. The most Zn-efficient cultivars included Bakhtawar, Gatcher S61, Wilgoyne, and Madrigal, and the most Zn inefficient included Durati, Songlen, Excalibur, and Chakwal-86. Zn-efficient cultivars accumulated greater amounts of Zn in their shoots than inefficient cultivars, but the correlation between shoot Zn and shoot dry matter production was poor. All the cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and phosphorus (P) at deficient levels of Zn, compared with adequate Zn concentrations. The Zn-inefficient cultivars accumulated higher concentrations of these other elements compared to efficient cultivars.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00103620600710454</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-3624
ispartof Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2006-06, Vol.37 (11-12), p.1703-1721
issn 0010-3624
1532-2416
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00103620600710454
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Barley
Biological and medical sciences
copper
cultivars
deficiency
dry matter accumulation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hordeum vulgare
iron
manganese
nutrient deficiencies
nutrient retention
nutrient solutions
nutrient use efficiency
nutrient-nutrient interactions
phosphorus
plant nutrition
shoots
Triticum aestivum
wheat
zinc
zinc efficiency
title Zinc deficiency in selected cultivars of wheat and barley as tested in solution culture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A24%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zinc%20deficiency%20in%20selected%20cultivars%20of%20wheat%20and%20barley%20as%20tested%20in%20solution%20culture&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20soil%20science%20and%20plant%20analysis&rft.au=Imtiaz,%20M&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=1703&rft.epage=1721&rft.pages=1703-1721&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.coden=CSOSA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00103620600710454&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201301091470%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a1c7d74ae89262ca61d0ac3ffe03bea0074e16acd296de9453d92ab598f5eb223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true