Loading…

Vygotsky and moral education: A response to and expansion of Tappan

Despite increasing studies and applications of Vygotsky's theory of learning and development, little has been written connecting Vygotsky specifically to moral education. The most comprehensive attempt at formulating such an account is given by Mark Tappan. I critically evaluate Tappan's a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational philosophy and theory 2019-01, Vol.51 (1), p.41-50
Main Author: Lewis, Colin J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Educational philosophy and theory
container_volume 51
creator Lewis, Colin J.
description Despite increasing studies and applications of Vygotsky's theory of learning and development, little has been written connecting Vygotsky specifically to moral education. The most comprehensive attempt at formulating such an account is given by Mark Tappan. I critically evaluate Tappan's account before raising several problems for his approach. I then offer suggestions for resolving these issues by turning to research in socialization theory and recommending additional sociocultural artifacts that can supplement moral education.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00131857.2018.1427576
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00131857_2018_1427576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1205845</ericid><sourcerecordid>2820859318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_YVDwujNJmyb1yjHmFwNvprfhtE2ks0tq0uHqrzd1U--8Ohzeh_ccHoQmBE8JFvgKY5IQwfiUYiKmJKWc8ewIjUia5TEThB6j0cDEA3SKzrxfh5WlnI_Q_KV_tZ1_6yMwVbSxDppIVdsSutqa62gWOeVba7yKOvuNqF0LxocwsjpaQRu2c3SiofHq4jDH6Pl2sZrfx8unu4f5bBmXiRBdXKisKFkBjIu8wiAYSTUHxYoUiIA0yzCtCqIU4yUuq0wUROdaUEyzJNNAIRmjy31v6-z7VvlOru3WmXBS0sAJlgcNgWJ7qnTWe6e0bF29AddLguXgS_74koMvefD1124a8ylrU6ldmHmeY4Z5QsN3IuGBmuwp5eryt3nxSChmImUhv9nntdHWbeDDuqaSHfSNddqBKWsvk_8f-QJJQYTz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2820859318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vygotsky and moral education: A response to and expansion of Tappan</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Lewis, Colin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite increasing studies and applications of Vygotsky's theory of learning and development, little has been written connecting Vygotsky specifically to moral education. The most comprehensive attempt at formulating such an account is given by Mark Tappan. I critically evaluate Tappan's account before raising several problems for his approach. I then offer suggestions for resolving these issues by turning to research in socialization theory and recommending additional sociocultural artifacts that can supplement moral education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1857</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-5812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1427576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Constructivism (Philosophy) ; Criticism ; Educational Philosophy ; Ethical Instruction ; Learning Theories ; Moral Development ; Moral education ; moral psychology ; Moral Values ; Philosophy ; Psychology ; social constructivism ; Socialization ; Sociocultural factors ; Sociocultural Patterns ; sociocultural tools ; Teaching Methods ; Vygotsky</subject><ispartof>Educational philosophy and theory, 2019-01, Vol.51 (1), p.41-50</ispartof><rights>2018 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia 2018</rights><rights>2018 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1205845$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,999050732602837&amp;tab=innz&amp;search_scope=INNZ&amp;vid=NLNZ&amp;offset=0$$DView this record in NLNZ$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Vygotsky and moral education: A response to and expansion of Tappan</title><title>Educational philosophy and theory</title><description>Despite increasing studies and applications of Vygotsky's theory of learning and development, little has been written connecting Vygotsky specifically to moral education. The most comprehensive attempt at formulating such an account is given by Mark Tappan. I critically evaluate Tappan's account before raising several problems for his approach. I then offer suggestions for resolving these issues by turning to research in socialization theory and recommending additional sociocultural artifacts that can supplement moral education.</description><subject>Constructivism (Philosophy)</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Ethical Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Moral Development</subject><subject>Moral education</subject><subject>moral psychology</subject><subject>Moral Values</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>social constructivism</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Sociocultural Patterns</subject><subject>sociocultural tools</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Vygotsky</subject><issn>0013-1857</issn><issn>1469-5812</issn><issn>1469-5812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_YVDwujNJmyb1yjHmFwNvprfhtE2ks0tq0uHqrzd1U--8Ohzeh_ccHoQmBE8JFvgKY5IQwfiUYiKmJKWc8ewIjUia5TEThB6j0cDEA3SKzrxfh5WlnI_Q_KV_tZ1_6yMwVbSxDppIVdsSutqa62gWOeVba7yKOvuNqF0LxocwsjpaQRu2c3SiofHq4jDH6Pl2sZrfx8unu4f5bBmXiRBdXKisKFkBjIu8wiAYSTUHxYoUiIA0yzCtCqIU4yUuq0wUROdaUEyzJNNAIRmjy31v6-z7VvlOru3WmXBS0sAJlgcNgWJ7qnTWe6e0bF29AddLguXgS_74koMvefD1124a8ylrU6ldmHmeY4Z5QsN3IuGBmuwp5eryt3nxSChmImUhv9nntdHWbeDDuqaSHfSNddqBKWsvk_8f-QJJQYTz</recordid><startdate>20190102</startdate><enddate>20190102</enddate><creator>Lewis, Colin J.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>DUNLO</scope><scope>GOM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190102</creationdate><title>Vygotsky and moral education: A response to and expansion of Tappan</title><author>Lewis, Colin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Constructivism (Philosophy)</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Ethical Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Moral Development</topic><topic>Moral education</topic><topic>moral psychology</topic><topic>Moral Values</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>social constructivism</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Sociocultural Patterns</topic><topic>sociocultural tools</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Vygotsky</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Index New Zealand (A&amp;I)</collection><collection>Index New Zealand</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Educational philosophy and theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Colin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1205845</ericid><atitle>Vygotsky and moral education: A response to and expansion of Tappan</atitle><jtitle>Educational philosophy and theory</jtitle><date>2019-01-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>41-50</pages><issn>0013-1857</issn><issn>1469-5812</issn><eissn>1469-5812</eissn><abstract>Despite increasing studies and applications of Vygotsky's theory of learning and development, little has been written connecting Vygotsky specifically to moral education. The most comprehensive attempt at formulating such an account is given by Mark Tappan. I critically evaluate Tappan's account before raising several problems for his approach. I then offer suggestions for resolving these issues by turning to research in socialization theory and recommending additional sociocultural artifacts that can supplement moral education.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00131857.2018.1427576</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-1857
ispartof Educational philosophy and theory, 2019-01, Vol.51 (1), p.41-50
issn 0013-1857
1469-5812
1469-5812
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00131857_2018_1427576
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Constructivism (Philosophy)
Criticism
Educational Philosophy
Ethical Instruction
Learning Theories
Moral Development
Moral education
moral psychology
Moral Values
Philosophy
Psychology
social constructivism
Socialization
Sociocultural factors
Sociocultural Patterns
sociocultural tools
Teaching Methods
Vygotsky
title Vygotsky and moral education: A response to and expansion of Tappan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A34%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vygotsky%20and%20moral%20education:%20A%20response%20to%20and%20expansion%20of%20Tappan&rft.jtitle=Educational%20philosophy%20and%20theory&rft.au=Lewis,%20Colin%20J.&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=41-50&rft.issn=0013-1857&rft.eissn=1469-5812&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00131857.2018.1427576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2820859318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-be6bc5ba5789d0a8514f7ae5b4a18a46602db1ee57c0cd68b1f9f8202636fa2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2820859318&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1205845&rfr_iscdi=true