Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist

Anti-normativists have advanced the view that the involvement of content in norms is not an essential feature of content, but a contingent feature or side effect of the normativity governing attitudes. In this paper, we argue that, in its original formulation, this view puts too much weight on the i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Inquiry (Oslo) 2021-11, Vol.64 (10), p.1051-1072
Main Authors: Verdejo, Víctor M., González de Prado, Javier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attitudes
belief normativity
Boghossian
Content normativity
Interconnections
primacy of belief
Speaks
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-cc3054c081c6968faa90a301a4d74f1270594477ea0df74e3560e4a91e56c7423
container_end_page 1072
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1051
container_title Inquiry (Oslo)
container_volume 64
creator Verdejo, Víctor M.
González de Prado, Javier
description Anti-normativists have advanced the view that the involvement of content in norms is not an essential feature of content, but a contingent feature or side effect of the normativity governing attitudes. In this paper, we argue that, in its original formulation, this view puts too much weight on the idea that belief is the fundamental, and perhaps the only, source of content-involving normativity. In its more refined formulation, however, the view does not make justice to a neutral and encompassing characterization of what it is for content to be essentially normative.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0020174X.2021.1985603
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0020174X_2021_1985603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586225119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-cc3054c081c6968faa90a301a4d74f1270594477ea0df74e3560e4a91e56c7423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhwPfXmPeNKLT4KBTcK7kLIJJo6TWqSKv33zlDduroc7jn3cj6EzjHMMDRwCUAAS_Y6I0DwDLcNF0AP0ARzIDVtCT1Ek9FTj6ZjdJLzCgaNhZig20UoNvXRfPjwVpk4qFAqHbpKl-LLtrNXla6S3fS7qsSqvNthWXwdYlrr4r98LqfoyOk-27PfOUUv93fP88d6-fSwmN8sa0MaUWpjKHBmoMFGtKJxWregKWDNOskcJhJ4y5iUVkPnJLN0aGGZbrHlwkhG6BRd7O9uUvzc2lzUKm5TGF4qwhtBCMe4HVx87zIp5pysU5vk1zrtFAY14lJ_uNSIS_3iGnLX-5wPbuz2HVPfqaJ3fUwu6WB8VvT_Ez81OHBF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586225119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Verdejo, Víctor M. ; González de Prado, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Verdejo, Víctor M. ; González de Prado, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Anti-normativists have advanced the view that the involvement of content in norms is not an essential feature of content, but a contingent feature or side effect of the normativity governing attitudes. In this paper, we argue that, in its original formulation, this view puts too much weight on the idea that belief is the fundamental, and perhaps the only, source of content-involving normativity. In its more refined formulation, however, the view does not make justice to a neutral and encompassing characterization of what it is for content to be essentially normative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-174X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1502-3923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2021.1985603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oslo: Routledge</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; belief normativity ; Boghossian ; Content normativity ; Interconnections ; primacy of belief ; Speaks</subject><ispartof>Inquiry (Oslo), 2021-11, Vol.64 (10), p.1051-1072</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-cc3054c081c6968faa90a301a4d74f1270594477ea0df74e3560e4a91e56c7423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verdejo, Víctor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González de Prado, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist</title><title>Inquiry (Oslo)</title><description>Anti-normativists have advanced the view that the involvement of content in norms is not an essential feature of content, but a contingent feature or side effect of the normativity governing attitudes. In this paper, we argue that, in its original formulation, this view puts too much weight on the idea that belief is the fundamental, and perhaps the only, source of content-involving normativity. In its more refined formulation, however, the view does not make justice to a neutral and encompassing characterization of what it is for content to be essentially normative.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>belief normativity</subject><subject>Boghossian</subject><subject>Content normativity</subject><subject>Interconnections</subject><subject>primacy of belief</subject><subject>Speaks</subject><issn>0020-174X</issn><issn>1502-3923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhwPfXmPeNKLT4KBTcK7kLIJJo6TWqSKv33zlDduroc7jn3cj6EzjHMMDRwCUAAS_Y6I0DwDLcNF0AP0ARzIDVtCT1Ek9FTj6ZjdJLzCgaNhZig20UoNvXRfPjwVpk4qFAqHbpKl-LLtrNXla6S3fS7qsSqvNthWXwdYlrr4r98LqfoyOk-27PfOUUv93fP88d6-fSwmN8sa0MaUWpjKHBmoMFGtKJxWregKWDNOskcJhJ4y5iUVkPnJLN0aGGZbrHlwkhG6BRd7O9uUvzc2lzUKm5TGF4qwhtBCMe4HVx87zIp5pysU5vk1zrtFAY14lJ_uNSIS_3iGnLX-5wPbuz2HVPfqaJ3fUwu6WB8VvT_Ez81OHBF</recordid><startdate>20211126</startdate><enddate>20211126</enddate><creator>Verdejo, Víctor M.</creator><creator>González de Prado, Javier</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211126</creationdate><title>Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist</title><author>Verdejo, Víctor M. ; González de Prado, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-cc3054c081c6968faa90a301a4d74f1270594477ea0df74e3560e4a91e56c7423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>belief normativity</topic><topic>Boghossian</topic><topic>Content normativity</topic><topic>Interconnections</topic><topic>primacy of belief</topic><topic>Speaks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verdejo, Víctor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González de Prado, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Inquiry (Oslo)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verdejo, Víctor M.</au><au>González de Prado, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist</atitle><jtitle>Inquiry (Oslo)</jtitle><date>2021-11-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1051</spage><epage>1072</epage><pages>1051-1072</pages><issn>0020-174X</issn><eissn>1502-3923</eissn><abstract>Anti-normativists have advanced the view that the involvement of content in norms is not an essential feature of content, but a contingent feature or side effect of the normativity governing attitudes. In this paper, we argue that, in its original formulation, this view puts too much weight on the idea that belief is the fundamental, and perhaps the only, source of content-involving normativity. In its more refined formulation, however, the view does not make justice to a neutral and encompassing characterization of what it is for content to be essentially normative.</abstract><cop>Oslo</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/0020174X.2021.1985603</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-174X
ispartof Inquiry (Oslo), 2021-11, Vol.64 (10), p.1051-1072
issn 0020-174X
1502-3923
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0020174X_2021_1985603
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Attitudes
belief normativity
Boghossian
Content normativity
Interconnections
primacy of belief
Speaks
title Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interlocking%20content%20and%20attitude:%20a%20reply%20to%20the%20anti-normativist&rft.jtitle=Inquiry%20(Oslo)&rft.au=Verdejo,%20V%C3%ADctor%20M.&rft.date=2021-11-26&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1051&rft.epage=1072&rft.pages=1051-1072&rft.issn=0020-174X&rft.eissn=1502-3923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1985603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586225119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-cc3054c081c6968faa90a301a4d74f1270594477ea0df74e3560e4a91e56c7423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586225119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true