Loading…
Mathematical understanding and ownership in learning: affordances of and student views on templates for proof-writing
For students taking higher level mathematics courses, the transition from computational to proof-based courses such as analysis and algebra not only introduces a new format of writing and communication, but also a new level of abstraction. This study examines the affordances of one particular tool t...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of mathematical education in science and technology 2024-10, Vol.55 (9), p.2249-2267 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-edfcd8c79d5286e7b26eb82281634a1ad0f286c86f05a66027f2614c383d1ff93 |
container_end_page | 2267 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2249 |
container_title | International journal of mathematical education in science and technology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Klanderman, Sarah Satyam, V. Rani |
description | For students taking higher level mathematics courses, the transition from computational to proof-based courses such as analysis and algebra not only introduces a new format of writing and communication, but also a new level of abstraction. This study examines the affordances of one particular tool to aid students in this transition: a proof template. We highlight four cases based on interviews conducted at two universities, both from transition-to-proof classes in which templates were explicitly used and not. Results indicate that when introduced to this tool, students viewed these templates favourably. Two detailed cases provide evidence that templates can contribute to deep understanding and student ownership of learning by deconstructing the template structures for themselves. In settings where explicit templates were not introduced, two cases address possible concerns with templates as well as demonstrate that students may be intuiting this structure. Our work provides evidence for the benefits of templates as a learning aid to struggling and strong students alike that does not reduce creativity in proving, along with students' appreciation of templates for structure and as guidelines to make sense of the increased abstraction required for proof-writing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0020739X.2022.2139775 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0020739X_2022_2139775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3096737469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-edfcd8c79d5286e7b26eb82281634a1ad0f286c86f05a66027f2614c383d1ff93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCHgumMebdq6UgZfMOJGwV3INImToU1qklrm35s649bVhXO_ew73AHCJ0QKjCl0jRFBJ648FQYQsCKZ1WRZHYIZzlmcFwfgYzCYmm6BTcBbCFiGE87yegeFFxI3qRDSNaOFgpfIhCiuN_YRpQDfapGxMD42FrRLeps0NFFo7L4VtVIBO_5IhDlLZCL-NGpNoYVRd34qYiMTC3juns9GbmAzOwYkWbVAXhzkH7w_3b8unbPX6-Ly8W2UNwSxmSupGVk1Zy4JUTJVrwtS6IqTCjOYCC4l00puKaVQIxhApNWE4b2hFJda6pnNwtfdN6V-DCpFv3eBtiuQU1aykZc4mqthTjXcheKV5700n_I5jxKeG-V_DfGqYHxpOd7f7O2PTh50YnW8lj2LXOq99KsekmP8tfgDhtoTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3096737469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mathematical understanding and ownership in learning: affordances of and student views on templates for proof-writing</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Klanderman, Sarah ; Satyam, V. Rani</creator><creatorcontrib>Klanderman, Sarah ; Satyam, V. Rani</creatorcontrib><description>For students taking higher level mathematics courses, the transition from computational to proof-based courses such as analysis and algebra not only introduces a new format of writing and communication, but also a new level of abstraction. This study examines the affordances of one particular tool to aid students in this transition: a proof template. We highlight four cases based on interviews conducted at two universities, both from transition-to-proof classes in which templates were explicitly used and not. Results indicate that when introduced to this tool, students viewed these templates favourably. Two detailed cases provide evidence that templates can contribute to deep understanding and student ownership of learning by deconstructing the template structures for themselves. In settings where explicit templates were not introduced, two cases address possible concerns with templates as well as demonstrate that students may be intuiting this structure. Our work provides evidence for the benefits of templates as a learning aid to struggling and strong students alike that does not reduce creativity in proving, along with students' appreciation of templates for structure and as guidelines to make sense of the increased abstraction required for proof-writing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-739X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2022.2139775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Colleges & universities ; Creativity ; Instructional aids ; Instructional Materials ; Learning ; Mathematics education ; Ownership ; proof scaffolding ; proof writing ; Software ; Students ; templates ; Transition-to-proof ; undergraduate mathematics education ; Universities</subject><ispartof>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 2024-10, Vol.55 (9), p.2249-2267</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-edfcd8c79d5286e7b26eb82281634a1ad0f286c86f05a66027f2614c383d1ff93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2039-074X ; 0000-0002-6879-9491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klanderman, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satyam, V. Rani</creatorcontrib><title>Mathematical understanding and ownership in learning: affordances of and student views on templates for proof-writing</title><title>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</title><description>For students taking higher level mathematics courses, the transition from computational to proof-based courses such as analysis and algebra not only introduces a new format of writing and communication, but also a new level of abstraction. This study examines the affordances of one particular tool to aid students in this transition: a proof template. We highlight four cases based on interviews conducted at two universities, both from transition-to-proof classes in which templates were explicitly used and not. Results indicate that when introduced to this tool, students viewed these templates favourably. Two detailed cases provide evidence that templates can contribute to deep understanding and student ownership of learning by deconstructing the template structures for themselves. In settings where explicit templates were not introduced, two cases address possible concerns with templates as well as demonstrate that students may be intuiting this structure. Our work provides evidence for the benefits of templates as a learning aid to struggling and strong students alike that does not reduce creativity in proving, along with students' appreciation of templates for structure and as guidelines to make sense of the increased abstraction required for proof-writing.</description><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Instructional aids</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>proof scaffolding</subject><subject>proof writing</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>templates</subject><subject>Transition-to-proof</subject><subject>undergraduate mathematics education</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0020-739X</issn><issn>1464-5211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCHgumMebdq6UgZfMOJGwV3INImToU1qklrm35s649bVhXO_ew73AHCJ0QKjCl0jRFBJ648FQYQsCKZ1WRZHYIZzlmcFwfgYzCYmm6BTcBbCFiGE87yegeFFxI3qRDSNaOFgpfIhCiuN_YRpQDfapGxMD42FrRLeps0NFFo7L4VtVIBO_5IhDlLZCL-NGpNoYVRd34qYiMTC3juns9GbmAzOwYkWbVAXhzkH7w_3b8unbPX6-Ly8W2UNwSxmSupGVk1Zy4JUTJVrwtS6IqTCjOYCC4l00puKaVQIxhApNWE4b2hFJda6pnNwtfdN6V-DCpFv3eBtiuQU1aykZc4mqthTjXcheKV5700n_I5jxKeG-V_DfGqYHxpOd7f7O2PTh50YnW8lj2LXOq99KsekmP8tfgDhtoTE</recordid><startdate>20241020</startdate><enddate>20241020</enddate><creator>Klanderman, Sarah</creator><creator>Satyam, V. Rani</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-074X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-9491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241020</creationdate><title>Mathematical understanding and ownership in learning: affordances of and student views on templates for proof-writing</title><author>Klanderman, Sarah ; Satyam, V. Rani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-edfcd8c79d5286e7b26eb82281634a1ad0f286c86f05a66027f2614c383d1ff93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Instructional aids</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>proof scaffolding</topic><topic>proof writing</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>templates</topic><topic>Transition-to-proof</topic><topic>undergraduate mathematics education</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klanderman, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satyam, V. Rani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klanderman, Sarah</au><au>Satyam, V. Rani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mathematical understanding and ownership in learning: affordances of and student views on templates for proof-writing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</jtitle><date>2024-10-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2249</spage><epage>2267</epage><pages>2249-2267</pages><issn>0020-739X</issn><eissn>1464-5211</eissn><abstract>For students taking higher level mathematics courses, the transition from computational to proof-based courses such as analysis and algebra not only introduces a new format of writing and communication, but also a new level of abstraction. This study examines the affordances of one particular tool to aid students in this transition: a proof template. We highlight four cases based on interviews conducted at two universities, both from transition-to-proof classes in which templates were explicitly used and not. Results indicate that when introduced to this tool, students viewed these templates favourably. Two detailed cases provide evidence that templates can contribute to deep understanding and student ownership of learning by deconstructing the template structures for themselves. In settings where explicit templates were not introduced, two cases address possible concerns with templates as well as demonstrate that students may be intuiting this structure. Our work provides evidence for the benefits of templates as a learning aid to struggling and strong students alike that does not reduce creativity in proving, along with students' appreciation of templates for structure and as guidelines to make sense of the increased abstraction required for proof-writing.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/0020739X.2022.2139775</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-074X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-9491</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-739X |
ispartof | International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 2024-10, Vol.55 (9), p.2249-2267 |
issn | 0020-739X 1464-5211 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0020739X_2022_2139775 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Colleges & universities Creativity Instructional aids Instructional Materials Learning Mathematics education Ownership proof scaffolding proof writing Software Students templates Transition-to-proof undergraduate mathematics education Universities |
title | Mathematical understanding and ownership in learning: affordances of and student views on templates for proof-writing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A16%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mathematical%20understanding%20and%20ownership%20in%20learning:%20affordances%20of%20and%20student%20views%20on%20templates%20for%20proof-writing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mathematical%20education%20in%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Klanderman,%20Sarah&rft.date=2024-10-20&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2249&rft.epage=2267&rft.pages=2249-2267&rft.issn=0020-739X&rft.eissn=1464-5211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2139775&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096737469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-edfcd8c79d5286e7b26eb82281634a1ad0f286c86f05a66027f2614c383d1ff93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3096737469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |