Can Multiple Texts Prompt Causal Thinking? The Role of Epistemic Emotions

When individuals seek to learn about scientific information, they likely turn to the Internet. There, they will find multiple documents with conflicting points of view and varying degrees of accuracy. Integrating this information is challenging and may evoke epistemic emotions which may, in turn, in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of experimental education 2023-10, Vol.91 (4), p.621-635
Main Authors: Danielson, Robert W., Sinatra, Gale M., Trevors, Greg, Muis, Krista R., Pekrun, Reinhard, Heddy, Benjamin C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Achievement Gains
Causal Models
Causal reasoning
Climate
Climate change
College Students
Emotions
epistemic emotions
Epistemology
Essays
Information Sources
Internet
multiple texts
Point of view
Prior Learning
Psychological Patterns
Reading Comprehension
Salience
Thinking Skills
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When individuals seek to learn about scientific information, they likely turn to the Internet. There, they will find multiple documents with conflicting points of view and varying degrees of accuracy. Integrating this information is challenging and may evoke epistemic emotions which may, in turn, influence how this information is integrated. Additionally, understanding complex scientific topics such as climate change requires causal reasoning. The current study investigated the role of emotions and prior knowledge in learning about the causes and effects of climate change from multiple texts. One hundred and twelve university students read either a congruent argument (two texts affirming the same point of view) or an incongruent argument (two texts with competing points of view). Text presentations were counterbalanced. Those who read congruent texts showed greater knowledge gains and were more likely to think causally than those in the incongruent group. Across all conditions, emotions tended to decrease in salience as participants read the second text, suggesting that individuals may become desensitized to the challenges of climate change with increased exposure to information. This suggests that caution must be taken to avoid promoting disengagement and inaction of individuals around controversial issues.
ISSN:0022-0973
1940-0683
DOI:10.1080/00220973.2022.2107604