Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues

The ability to find credible information online is necessary for informed civic engagement in the 21 st century. This need is particularly acute for young people, who often turn to the Internet to learn about social and political issues. Preparing students to evaluate online content, particularly as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of higher education (Columbus) 2022-11, Vol.93 (7), p.963-988
Main Authors: Breakstone, Joel, Smith, Mark, Ziv, Nadav, Wineburg, Sam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
assessment
Citizen Participation
Civics
College Students
Credibility
Digital literacy
False information
Information Literacy
Information seeking behavior
Information Sources
Internet
Media literacy
Misinformation
Online Searching
Political Issues
Politics
Social Problems
Teaching methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3
container_end_page 988
container_issue 7
container_start_page 963
container_title The Journal of higher education (Columbus)
container_volume 93
creator Breakstone, Joel
Smith, Mark
Ziv, Nadav
Wineburg, Sam
description The ability to find credible information online is necessary for informed civic engagement in the 21 st century. This need is particularly acute for young people, who often turn to the Internet to learn about social and political issues. Preparing students to evaluate online content, particularly as it concerns social and political issues, aligns with broader efforts to reinvigorate the civic mission of colleges and universities. We analyzed how college students (n= 263) evaluated online sources about public policy issues. Results showed that a majority employed ineffective strategies for evaluating digital information. Many of the strategies students used mirrored advice found on college and university websites. These findings suggest a need to reconsider post-secondary approaches to teaching online evaluation strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00221546.2022.2082783
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00221546_2022_2082783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1369892</ericid><sourcerecordid>2726184906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFvGyEUhFGVSnXS_oRISDmv84BdzOZUy3GaVJESqe0ZvWVZlwgvLrC28u-L5TTHcgCeZoZBHyGXDOYMFFwDcM6aWs55uZRN8YUSH8iMNUJVtazhjMyOnupo-kTOU3qBshhrZmRaub0z9DnaHUbMLox0CJHm35beuo3L6OlyY2_ofTjQVfDebiz9kafejjnR9R79hNnSp9G7sQhhisYmuuzClMtkXInj2NPn4F12pkwPKU02fSYfB_TJfnk7L8ivu_XP1X31-PTtYbV8rIyQkCvVm1py23A21J2SvWkb01oOnWxBwIAoBYO2XRiQjVpYhjgo6C0obLpOdCguyNXp3V0Mf0pv1i_li2Op1HzBJVN1C7K4mpPLxJBStIPeRbfF-KoZ6CNh_Y-wPhLWb4RL7vKUs9GZ98z6OxOyVS0v-teT7sbCdIuHEH2vM776EIeIo3FJi_9X_AV4L4ud</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726184906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Breakstone, Joel ; Smith, Mark ; Ziv, Nadav ; Wineburg, Sam</creator><creatorcontrib>Breakstone, Joel ; Smith, Mark ; Ziv, Nadav ; Wineburg, Sam</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to find credible information online is necessary for informed civic engagement in the 21 st century. This need is particularly acute for young people, who often turn to the Internet to learn about social and political issues. Preparing students to evaluate online content, particularly as it concerns social and political issues, aligns with broader efforts to reinvigorate the civic mission of colleges and universities. We analyzed how college students (n= 263) evaluated online sources about public policy issues. Results showed that a majority employed ineffective strategies for evaluating digital information. Many of the strategies students used mirrored advice found on college and university websites. These findings suggest a need to reconsider post-secondary approaches to teaching online evaluation strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2022.2082783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: Routledge</publisher><subject>assessment ; Citizen Participation ; Civics ; College Students ; Credibility ; Digital literacy ; False information ; Information Literacy ; Information seeking behavior ; Information Sources ; Internet ; Media literacy ; Misinformation ; Online Searching ; Political Issues ; Politics ; Social Problems ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of higher education (Columbus), 2022-11, Vol.93 (7), p.963-988</ispartof><rights>2022 The Ohio State University 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Ohio State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1048-7786 ; 0000-0003-0468-6399 ; 0000-0002-4838-1522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1369892$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breakstone, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziv, Nadav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wineburg, Sam</creatorcontrib><title>Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues</title><title>The Journal of higher education (Columbus)</title><description>The ability to find credible information online is necessary for informed civic engagement in the 21 st century. This need is particularly acute for young people, who often turn to the Internet to learn about social and political issues. Preparing students to evaluate online content, particularly as it concerns social and political issues, aligns with broader efforts to reinvigorate the civic mission of colleges and universities. We analyzed how college students (n= 263) evaluated online sources about public policy issues. Results showed that a majority employed ineffective strategies for evaluating digital information. Many of the strategies students used mirrored advice found on college and university websites. These findings suggest a need to reconsider post-secondary approaches to teaching online evaluation strategies.</description><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>Civics</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Digital literacy</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Information Literacy</subject><subject>Information seeking behavior</subject><subject>Information Sources</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Media literacy</subject><subject>Misinformation</subject><subject>Online Searching</subject><subject>Political Issues</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social Problems</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>0022-1546</issn><issn>1538-4640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFvGyEUhFGVSnXS_oRISDmv84BdzOZUy3GaVJESqe0ZvWVZlwgvLrC28u-L5TTHcgCeZoZBHyGXDOYMFFwDcM6aWs55uZRN8YUSH8iMNUJVtazhjMyOnupo-kTOU3qBshhrZmRaub0z9DnaHUbMLox0CJHm35beuo3L6OlyY2_ofTjQVfDebiz9kafejjnR9R79hNnSp9G7sQhhisYmuuzClMtkXInj2NPn4F12pkwPKU02fSYfB_TJfnk7L8ivu_XP1X31-PTtYbV8rIyQkCvVm1py23A21J2SvWkb01oOnWxBwIAoBYO2XRiQjVpYhjgo6C0obLpOdCguyNXp3V0Mf0pv1i_li2Op1HzBJVN1C7K4mpPLxJBStIPeRbfF-KoZ6CNh_Y-wPhLWb4RL7vKUs9GZ98z6OxOyVS0v-teT7sbCdIuHEH2vM776EIeIo3FJi_9X_AV4L4ud</recordid><startdate>20221110</startdate><enddate>20221110</enddate><creator>Breakstone, Joel</creator><creator>Smith, Mark</creator><creator>Ziv, Nadav</creator><creator>Wineburg, Sam</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1048-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0468-6399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-1522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221110</creationdate><title>Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues</title><author>Breakstone, Joel ; Smith, Mark ; Ziv, Nadav ; Wineburg, Sam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>Civics</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Digital literacy</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Information Literacy</topic><topic>Information seeking behavior</topic><topic>Information Sources</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Media literacy</topic><topic>Misinformation</topic><topic>Online Searching</topic><topic>Political Issues</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social Problems</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breakstone, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziv, Nadav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wineburg, Sam</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of higher education (Columbus)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breakstone, Joel</au><au>Smith, Mark</au><au>Ziv, Nadav</au><au>Wineburg, Sam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1369892</ericid><atitle>Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of higher education (Columbus)</jtitle><date>2022-11-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>963-988</pages><issn>0022-1546</issn><eissn>1538-4640</eissn><abstract>The ability to find credible information online is necessary for informed civic engagement in the 21 st century. This need is particularly acute for young people, who often turn to the Internet to learn about social and political issues. Preparing students to evaluate online content, particularly as it concerns social and political issues, aligns with broader efforts to reinvigorate the civic mission of colleges and universities. We analyzed how college students (n= 263) evaluated online sources about public policy issues. Results showed that a majority employed ineffective strategies for evaluating digital information. Many of the strategies students used mirrored advice found on college and university websites. These findings suggest a need to reconsider post-secondary approaches to teaching online evaluation strategies.</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00221546.2022.2082783</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1048-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0468-6399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-1522</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1546
ispartof The Journal of higher education (Columbus), 2022-11, Vol.93 (7), p.963-988
issn 0022-1546
1538-4640
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00221546_2022_2082783
source ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects assessment
Citizen Participation
Civics
College Students
Credibility
Digital literacy
False information
Information Literacy
Information seeking behavior
Information Sources
Internet
Media literacy
Misinformation
Online Searching
Political Issues
Politics
Social Problems
Teaching methods
title Civic Preparation for the Digital Age: How College Students Evaluate Online Sources About Social and Political Issues
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A53%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Civic%20Preparation%20for%20the%20Digital%20Age:%20How%20College%20Students%20Evaluate%20Online%20Sources%20About%20Social%20and%20Political%20Issues&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20higher%20education%20(Columbus)&rft.au=Breakstone,%20Joel&rft.date=2022-11-10&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=963-988&rft.issn=0022-1546&rft.eissn=1538-4640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00221546.2022.2082783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2726184906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8dc462e521f4b86dc95c9e20b69030faa6310997c06587e1aaf80de08a5bb3ba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726184906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1369892&rfr_iscdi=true