Loading…

Anti-old and anti-youth attitudes among older adults: focusing on middle-aged and old age identity

There is currently a lack of comprehensive scholarly information concerning the attitudes older people hold toward both older adults and the young. Using the social identity theory framework, this study investigated older identity issues including middle-aged identity and old age identity. We conduc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of social psychology 2023-03, Vol.163 (2), p.248-255
Main Authors: Shimizu, Yuho, Takeuchi, Masumi, Karasawa, Kaori
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is currently a lack of comprehensive scholarly information concerning the attitudes older people hold toward both older adults and the young. Using the social identity theory framework, this study investigated older identity issues including middle-aged identity and old age identity. We conducted an online survey of Japanese older participants (N = 301) and then implemented a Bayesian structural equation modeling to examine whether age and gender predicted middle-aged/old age identity in addition to whether middle-aged/old age identity predicted anti-old/anti-youth attitudes. Results showed the more strongly participants identified with being middle-aged the more positive their attitudes were toward old/young people, while they showed no significant relationship between old age identity and the attitudes. Regarding participant ages, the results found no significant relationship with middle-aged identity but a positive relationship with old age identity. These findings will contribute to psychological research aimed at reducing anti-old/anti-youth attitudes among older adults. 1 1 A part of this study was presented at the 85th Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association.
ISSN:0022-4545
1940-1183
DOI:10.1080/00224545.2022.2061893