Loading…
Scholarship and Epistemology: A Response to Backman and Barker (2022)
In this response, we address issues they raised in their paper. We tackle the misrepresentation of our research and findings by further clarifying the applied behavior analytic framework underpinning our intervention studies; emphasize the substantial effects of improving the content knowledge of te...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quest (National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education) 2022-10, Vol.74 (4), p.339-343 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this response, we address issues they raised in their paper. We tackle the misrepresentation of our research and findings by further clarifying the applied behavior analytic framework underpinning our intervention studies; emphasize the substantial effects of improving the content knowledge of teachers; refute ideological positioning based on scholarly one-upmanship; and elaborate on the scientific growth of our understanding of CCK. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-6297 1543-2750 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00336297.2022.2158480 |