Loading…
Textual criticism and Old Norse philology
Old Norse editors typically apply the principles of textual criticism with moderation, mainly correcting obvious errors. The exception is poetry, where the introduction of variant readings and emendations is often necessary. This two-pronged and overall restrictive approach is based on the character...
Saved in:
Published in: | Studia neophilologica 2023-05, Vol.95 (2), p.180-204 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793 |
container_end_page | 204 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | Studia neophilologica |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Males, Mikael |
description | Old Norse editors typically apply the principles of textual criticism with moderation, mainly correcting obvious errors. The exception is poetry, where the introduction of variant readings and emendations is often necessary. This two-pronged and overall restrictive approach is based on the characteristics of the corpus, but in recent decades, some scholars have called its premises into question, either in theory or in practice. In most examples discussed in this article, arguments against textual criticism are paired with disregard for or misrepresentation of its aims and methods. In other instances, scholars who attempt a reconstructive approach neglect the epistemological preconditions of textual criticism, even when drawing on its assumptions. In order to address these issues, the present article discusses the goals and principles of textual criticism with reference to examples from Old Norse scholarship. Specifically, it explores how scholars relate to scribal errors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00393274.2023.2205888 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00393274_2023_2205888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_00393274_2023_2205888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEi5ckhZ23Hs3EAVFKSKXsrZ2voHjNK4soOgb0-itlcuO5dvRjtDyC2FGQUF9wC84UxWMwaMzxgDoZQ6IxNaC1oyDuqcTEamHKFLcpXzFwBIruSE3K3db_-NbWFS6IMJeVtgZ4tVa4u3mLIrdp-hjW382F-TC49tdjdHnZL356f1_KVcrhav88dlabhifelQGI8UKgrIUFHBa7RUmkohR-DWUdl4Yx1ibYy3zYZLlBumKrGRDciGT0lxyB0-yn3odBcT6qGoYMOV9ZA4JeKExJyT83qXwhbTfgBGEvRpEj1Ooo-TDL6Hgy90PqYt_sTUWt3jvo3JJ-yG-pr_H_EHLt5mCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Textual criticism and Old Norse philology</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>MLA International Bibliography with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Males, Mikael</creator><creatorcontrib>Males, Mikael</creatorcontrib><description>Old Norse editors typically apply the principles of textual criticism with moderation, mainly correcting obvious errors. The exception is poetry, where the introduction of variant readings and emendations is often necessary. This two-pronged and overall restrictive approach is based on the characteristics of the corpus, but in recent decades, some scholars have called its premises into question, either in theory or in practice. In most examples discussed in this article, arguments against textual criticism are paired with disregard for or misrepresentation of its aims and methods. In other instances, scholars who attempt a reconstructive approach neglect the epistemological preconditions of textual criticism, even when drawing on its assumptions. In order to address these issues, the present article discusses the goals and principles of textual criticism with reference to examples from Old Norse scholarship. Specifically, it explores how scholars relate to scribal errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2023.2205888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Eddic poetry ; Old Norse ; stemmatics ; Textual criticism</subject><ispartof>Studia neophilologica, 2023-05, Vol.95 (2), p.180-204</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,26566,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Males, Mikael</creatorcontrib><title>Textual criticism and Old Norse philology</title><title>Studia neophilologica</title><description>Old Norse editors typically apply the principles of textual criticism with moderation, mainly correcting obvious errors. The exception is poetry, where the introduction of variant readings and emendations is often necessary. This two-pronged and overall restrictive approach is based on the characteristics of the corpus, but in recent decades, some scholars have called its premises into question, either in theory or in practice. In most examples discussed in this article, arguments against textual criticism are paired with disregard for or misrepresentation of its aims and methods. In other instances, scholars who attempt a reconstructive approach neglect the epistemological preconditions of textual criticism, even when drawing on its assumptions. In order to address these issues, the present article discusses the goals and principles of textual criticism with reference to examples from Old Norse scholarship. Specifically, it explores how scholars relate to scribal errors.</description><subject>Eddic poetry</subject><subject>Old Norse</subject><subject>stemmatics</subject><subject>Textual criticism</subject><issn>0039-3274</issn><issn>1651-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCEi5ckhZ23Hs3EAVFKSKXsrZ2voHjNK4soOgb0-itlcuO5dvRjtDyC2FGQUF9wC84UxWMwaMzxgDoZQ6IxNaC1oyDuqcTEamHKFLcpXzFwBIruSE3K3db_-NbWFS6IMJeVtgZ4tVa4u3mLIrdp-hjW382F-TC49tdjdHnZL356f1_KVcrhav88dlabhifelQGI8UKgrIUFHBa7RUmkohR-DWUdl4Yx1ibYy3zYZLlBumKrGRDciGT0lxyB0-yn3odBcT6qGoYMOV9ZA4JeKExJyT83qXwhbTfgBGEvRpEj1Ooo-TDL6Hgy90PqYt_sTUWt3jvo3JJ-yG-pr_H_EHLt5mCg</recordid><startdate>20230504</startdate><enddate>20230504</enddate><creator>Males, Mikael</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230504</creationdate><title>Textual criticism and Old Norse philology</title><author>Males, Mikael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Eddic poetry</topic><topic>Old Norse</topic><topic>stemmatics</topic><topic>Textual criticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Males, Mikael</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Studia neophilologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Males, Mikael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Textual criticism and Old Norse philology</atitle><jtitle>Studia neophilologica</jtitle><date>2023-05-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>180-204</pages><issn>0039-3274</issn><eissn>1651-2308</eissn><abstract>Old Norse editors typically apply the principles of textual criticism with moderation, mainly correcting obvious errors. The exception is poetry, where the introduction of variant readings and emendations is often necessary. This two-pronged and overall restrictive approach is based on the characteristics of the corpus, but in recent decades, some scholars have called its premises into question, either in theory or in practice. In most examples discussed in this article, arguments against textual criticism are paired with disregard for or misrepresentation of its aims and methods. In other instances, scholars who attempt a reconstructive approach neglect the epistemological preconditions of textual criticism, even when drawing on its assumptions. In order to address these issues, the present article discusses the goals and principles of textual criticism with reference to examples from Old Norse scholarship. Specifically, it explores how scholars relate to scribal errors.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00393274.2023.2205888</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-3274 |
ispartof | Studia neophilologica, 2023-05, Vol.95 (2), p.180-204 |
issn | 0039-3274 1651-2308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00393274_2023_2205888 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; MLA International Bibliography with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Eddic poetry Old Norse stemmatics Textual criticism |
title | Textual criticism and Old Norse philology |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Textual%20criticism%20and%20Old%20Norse%20philology&rft.jtitle=Studia%20neophilologica&rft.au=Males,%20Mikael&rft.date=2023-05-04&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=180-204&rft.issn=0039-3274&rft.eissn=1651-2308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00393274.2023.2205888&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_00393274_2023_2205888%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ea5cfa10410a2a81536ad17c48a3a03de179fcdeaa6ccfd9b37a7b2845b790793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |