Loading…
From Quad to Quint? Vietnam's Strategic Potential
The United States should enlarge its concept for countering Chinese expansionism to stress economic power in addition to military power. One bold move to this end would be to include Vietnam in a redefined 'Quint' alongside the current Quad comprising Australia, India, Japan and the United...
Saved in:
Published in: | Survival (London) 2024-01, Vol.66 (1), p.57-65 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 65 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Survival (London) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Adams, James Gompert, David C. Knudson, Thomas |
description | The United States should enlarge its concept for countering Chinese expansionism to stress economic power in addition to military power. One bold move to this end would be to include Vietnam in a redefined 'Quint' alongside the current Quad comprising Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Instead of forging a US-Vietnam defence treaty and encouraging a Vietnamese military build-up, which could trigger a hostile Chinese reaction, the US would help Vietnam advance its own priorities of renewable development and improved worker productivity. For this, an American-led business-government initiative will be needed. As China's economy sputters while its military investments grow, a Quint with both economic and military power could enjoy an advantage in peacetime and during crises. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00396338.2024.2309074 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00396338_2024_2309074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922706554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-741da685b4a612b10177532256fbbe68c9444dced5cfcb5f097cfd7750363a103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKc_QSh44VXnm882VypjU2Gg4sdtSNNEOtpmJhmyf2_L5q1X5-Y558CD0CWGGYYSbgCoFJSWMwKEzQgFCQU7QhPMRJkTIeUxmoxMPkKn6CzGNQBgDHKC8DL4Lnvd6jpLfsimT7fZZ2NTr7vrmL2loJP9akz24pPtU6Pbc3TidBvtxSGn6GO5eJ8_5qvnh6f5_So3pBQpLxiutSh5xbTApMKAi4JTQrhwVWVFaSRjrDa25saZijuQhXH1wAAVVGOgU3S1390E_721Mam134Z-uFREElKA4JwNFN9TJvgYg3VqE5pOh53CoEY76s-OGu2og52hd7fvNb3zodM_PrS1SnrX-uCC7k0TFf1_4hd40GlI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922706554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Quad to Quint? Vietnam's Strategic Potential</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Adams, James ; Gompert, David C. ; Knudson, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, James ; Gompert, David C. ; Knudson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The United States should enlarge its concept for countering Chinese expansionism to stress economic power in addition to military power. One bold move to this end would be to include Vietnam in a redefined 'Quint' alongside the current Quad comprising Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Instead of forging a US-Vietnam defence treaty and encouraging a Vietnamese military build-up, which could trigger a hostile Chinese reaction, the US would help Vietnam advance its own priorities of renewable development and improved worker productivity. For this, an American-led business-government initiative will be needed. As China's economy sputters while its military investments grow, a Quint with both economic and military power could enjoy an advantage in peacetime and during crises.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6338</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2024.2309074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Australia ; China ; containment ; foreign direct investment (FDI) ; India ; Power ; Productivity ; Quad ; Quint ; renewable development ; South China Sea ; Taiwan ; Treaties ; United States ; Vietnam</subject><ispartof>Survival (London), 2024-01, Vol.66 (1), p.57-65</ispartof><rights>2024 The International Institute for Strategic Studies 2024</rights><rights>2024 The International Institute for Strategic Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gompert, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>From Quad to Quint? Vietnam's Strategic Potential</title><title>Survival (London)</title><description>The United States should enlarge its concept for countering Chinese expansionism to stress economic power in addition to military power. One bold move to this end would be to include Vietnam in a redefined 'Quint' alongside the current Quad comprising Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Instead of forging a US-Vietnam defence treaty and encouraging a Vietnamese military build-up, which could trigger a hostile Chinese reaction, the US would help Vietnam advance its own priorities of renewable development and improved worker productivity. For this, an American-led business-government initiative will be needed. As China's economy sputters while its military investments grow, a Quint with both economic and military power could enjoy an advantage in peacetime and during crises.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>containment</subject><subject>foreign direct investment (FDI)</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quad</subject><subject>Quint</subject><subject>renewable development</subject><subject>South China Sea</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vietnam</subject><issn>0039-6338</issn><issn>1468-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKc_QSh44VXnm882VypjU2Gg4sdtSNNEOtpmJhmyf2_L5q1X5-Y558CD0CWGGYYSbgCoFJSWMwKEzQgFCQU7QhPMRJkTIeUxmoxMPkKn6CzGNQBgDHKC8DL4Lnvd6jpLfsimT7fZZ2NTr7vrmL2loJP9akz24pPtU6Pbc3TidBvtxSGn6GO5eJ8_5qvnh6f5_So3pBQpLxiutSh5xbTApMKAi4JTQrhwVWVFaSRjrDa25saZijuQhXH1wAAVVGOgU3S1390E_721Mam134Z-uFREElKA4JwNFN9TJvgYg3VqE5pOh53CoEY76s-OGu2og52hd7fvNb3zodM_PrS1SnrX-uCC7k0TFf1_4hd40GlI</recordid><startdate>20240102</startdate><enddate>20240102</enddate><creator>Adams, James</creator><creator>Gompert, David C.</creator><creator>Knudson, Thomas</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240102</creationdate><title>From Quad to Quint? Vietnam's Strategic Potential</title><author>Adams, James ; Gompert, David C. ; Knudson, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-741da685b4a612b10177532256fbbe68c9444dced5cfcb5f097cfd7750363a103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>containment</topic><topic>foreign direct investment (FDI)</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quad</topic><topic>Quint</topic><topic>renewable development</topic><topic>South China Sea</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vietnam</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gompert, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Survival (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, James</au><au>Gompert, David C.</au><au>Knudson, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Quad to Quint? Vietnam's Strategic Potential</atitle><jtitle>Survival (London)</jtitle><date>2024-01-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>57-65</pages><issn>0039-6338</issn><eissn>1468-2699</eissn><abstract>The United States should enlarge its concept for countering Chinese expansionism to stress economic power in addition to military power. One bold move to this end would be to include Vietnam in a redefined 'Quint' alongside the current Quad comprising Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Instead of forging a US-Vietnam defence treaty and encouraging a Vietnamese military build-up, which could trigger a hostile Chinese reaction, the US would help Vietnam advance its own priorities of renewable development and improved worker productivity. For this, an American-led business-government initiative will be needed. As China's economy sputters while its military investments grow, a Quint with both economic and military power could enjoy an advantage in peacetime and during crises.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00396338.2024.2309074</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6338 |
ispartof | Survival (London), 2024-01, Vol.66 (1), p.57-65 |
issn | 0039-6338 1468-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_00396338_2024_2309074 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Australia China containment foreign direct investment (FDI) India Power Productivity Quad Quint renewable development South China Sea Taiwan Treaties United States Vietnam |
title | From Quad to Quint? Vietnam's Strategic Potential |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A42%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Quad%20to%20Quint?%20Vietnam's%20Strategic%20Potential&rft.jtitle=Survival%20(London)&rft.au=Adams,%20James&rft.date=2024-01-02&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=57-65&rft.issn=0039-6338&rft.eissn=1468-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00396338.2024.2309074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2922706554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-741da685b4a612b10177532256fbbe68c9444dced5cfcb5f097cfd7750363a103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922706554&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |