Loading…
Taking the long view of deterrence
In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's us...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of strategic studies 2005-10, Vol.28 (5), p.751-763 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 763 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 751 |
container_title | Journal of strategic studies |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Morgan, Patrick M. |
description | In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms & internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict & promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, & a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01402390500393837 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01402390500393837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512213179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgQbxEZ3Y33V3wIsUvKHip4C1sNrMaTZO6m1r7702pt6I9zQvzPDPwMnaKcImg4QpQAhcGMgBhhBZqjw1QSZEaoV722WC9T9fAITuK8R0Atc7EgJ1N7UfVvCbdGyV124evipZJ65OSOgqBGkfH7MDbOtLJ7xyy57vb6fghnTzdP45vJqmTEruUSiygtMppYbwijzgy3jpLzhugzBRcFg4LLzlSwRGF19qANLIQfkQKxJCdb-7OQ_u5oNjlsyo6qmvbULuIeWYUBzB8JyiUQsm16sGLf0HMkHMUqEyP4gZ1oY0xkM_noZrZsMoR8nXD-VbDvaM2TtX4Nszssg11mXd2VbfBB9u4Km5beffd9eb1TlP8_fgHQaaRJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512213179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taking the long view of deterrence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Morgan, Patrick M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><description>In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms & internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict & promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, & a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-2390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-937X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01402390500393837</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSTSD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Cold War ; Community ; Deterrence ; International Relations ; International security ; International system ; Legitimacy ; NATO ; Norms ; Weapons of mass destruction</subject><ispartof>Journal of strategic studies, 2005-10, Vol.28 (5), p.751-763</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><title>Taking the long view of deterrence</title><title>Journal of strategic studies</title><description>In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms & internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict & promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, & a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell</description><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International security</subject><subject>International system</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>NATO</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Weapons of mass destruction</subject><issn>0140-2390</issn><issn>1743-937X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgQbxEZ3Y33V3wIsUvKHip4C1sNrMaTZO6m1r7702pt6I9zQvzPDPwMnaKcImg4QpQAhcGMgBhhBZqjw1QSZEaoV722WC9T9fAITuK8R0Atc7EgJ1N7UfVvCbdGyV124evipZJ65OSOgqBGkfH7MDbOtLJ7xyy57vb6fghnTzdP45vJqmTEruUSiygtMppYbwijzgy3jpLzhugzBRcFg4LLzlSwRGF19qANLIQfkQKxJCdb-7OQ_u5oNjlsyo6qmvbULuIeWYUBzB8JyiUQsm16sGLf0HMkHMUqEyP4gZ1oY0xkM_noZrZsMoR8nXD-VbDvaM2TtX4Nszssg11mXd2VbfBB9u4Km5beffd9eb1TlP8_fgHQaaRJg</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Morgan, Patrick M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Taking the long view of deterrence</title><author>Morgan, Patrick M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International security</topic><topic>International system</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>NATO</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Weapons of mass destruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of strategic studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Patrick M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taking the long view of deterrence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strategic studies</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>751-763</pages><issn>0140-2390</issn><eissn>1743-937X</eissn><coden>JSTSD5</coden><abstract>In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms & internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict & promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, & a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01402390500393837</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-2390 |
ispartof | Journal of strategic studies, 2005-10, Vol.28 (5), p.751-763 |
issn | 0140-2390 1743-937X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01402390500393837 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Cold War Community Deterrence International Relations International security International system Legitimacy NATO Norms Weapons of mass destruction |
title | Taking the long view of deterrence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking%20the%20long%20view%20of%20deterrence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strategic%20studies&rft.au=Morgan,%20Patrick%20M.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=751-763&rft.issn=0140-2390&rft.eissn=1743-937X&rft.coden=JSTSD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01402390500393837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1512213179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512213179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |