Loading…

Taking the long view of deterrence

In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of strategic studies 2005-10, Vol.28 (5), p.751-763
Main Author: Morgan, Patrick M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703
cites
container_end_page 763
container_issue 5
container_start_page 751
container_title Journal of strategic studies
container_volume 28
creator Morgan, Patrick M.
description In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, & therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms & internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict & promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, & a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01402390500393837
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01402390500393837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512213179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgQbxEZ3Y33V3wIsUvKHip4C1sNrMaTZO6m1r7702pt6I9zQvzPDPwMnaKcImg4QpQAhcGMgBhhBZqjw1QSZEaoV722WC9T9fAITuK8R0Atc7EgJ1N7UfVvCbdGyV124evipZJ65OSOgqBGkfH7MDbOtLJ7xyy57vb6fghnTzdP45vJqmTEruUSiygtMppYbwijzgy3jpLzhugzBRcFg4LLzlSwRGF19qANLIQfkQKxJCdb-7OQ_u5oNjlsyo6qmvbULuIeWYUBzB8JyiUQsm16sGLf0HMkHMUqEyP4gZ1oY0xkM_noZrZsMoR8nXD-VbDvaM2TtX4Nszssg11mXd2VbfBB9u4Km5beffd9eb1TlP8_fgHQaaRJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512213179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taking the long view of deterrence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Morgan, Patrick M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><description>In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, &amp; therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms &amp; internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict &amp; promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, &amp; a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-2390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-937X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01402390500393837</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSTSD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Cold War ; Community ; Deterrence ; International Relations ; International security ; International system ; Legitimacy ; NATO ; Norms ; Weapons of mass destruction</subject><ispartof>Journal of strategic studies, 2005-10, Vol.28 (5), p.751-763</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><title>Taking the long view of deterrence</title><title>Journal of strategic studies</title><description>In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, &amp; therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms &amp; internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict &amp; promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, &amp; a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell</description><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International security</subject><subject>International system</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>NATO</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Weapons of mass destruction</subject><issn>0140-2390</issn><issn>1743-937X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgQbxEZ3Y33V3wIsUvKHip4C1sNrMaTZO6m1r7702pt6I9zQvzPDPwMnaKcImg4QpQAhcGMgBhhBZqjw1QSZEaoV722WC9T9fAITuK8R0Atc7EgJ1N7UfVvCbdGyV124evipZJ65OSOgqBGkfH7MDbOtLJ7xyy57vb6fghnTzdP45vJqmTEruUSiygtMppYbwijzgy3jpLzhugzBRcFg4LLzlSwRGF19qANLIQfkQKxJCdb-7OQ_u5oNjlsyo6qmvbULuIeWYUBzB8JyiUQsm16sGLf0HMkHMUqEyP4gZ1oY0xkM_noZrZsMoR8nXD-VbDvaM2TtX4Nszssg11mXd2VbfBB9u4Km5beffd9eb1TlP8_fgHQaaRJg</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Morgan, Patrick M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Taking the long view of deterrence</title><author>Morgan, Patrick M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International security</topic><topic>International system</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>NATO</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Weapons of mass destruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of strategic studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Patrick M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taking the long view of deterrence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strategic studies</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>751-763</pages><issn>0140-2390</issn><eissn>1743-937X</eissn><coden>JSTSD5</coden><abstract>In this first response in a roundtable discussion on Sir Lawrence Freedman's book Deterrence, the author characterizes the concept of deterrence as a security management system that is evolving, &amp; therefore relevant as a contemporary resource for the international system. Freedman's use of the term "internalized deterrence" is unpacked to explore the possibly antithetical use of internalized norms &amp; internalized deterrence that rests on a vision of changing international actor behavior through the spread of international norms. The author critiques the role of deterrence in inculcating norms, citing the role of elite in Europe in the limitation of conflict &amp; promotion of cooperation. Freedman's perspective on community development is characterized as a long-term development that will depend on a strong sense of international community. The author concludes that the creation of legitimacy through embedded norms, &amp; a multilateral approach by the US will create a collective of actors to internalize deterrence norms for credibility. J. Harwell</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01402390500393837</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-2390
ispartof Journal of strategic studies, 2005-10, Vol.28 (5), p.751-763
issn 0140-2390
1743-937X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01402390500393837
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Cold War
Community
Deterrence
International Relations
International security
International system
Legitimacy
NATO
Norms
Weapons of mass destruction
title Taking the long view of deterrence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking%20the%20long%20view%20of%20deterrence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strategic%20studies&rft.au=Morgan,%20Patrick%20M.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=751-763&rft.issn=0140-2390&rft.eissn=1743-937X&rft.coden=JSTSD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01402390500393837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1512213179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ed1b0da7c839f7ef1169facaecf90e59b24bc1bf421eb2113f8890494b3f6e703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512213179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true