Loading…

Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital

Summary A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005-10, Vol.25 (7), p.662-665
Main Authors: Pathadey, S. D., Van Woerden, H. C., Jenkinson, S. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333
container_end_page 665
container_issue 7
container_start_page 662
container_title Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 25
creator Pathadey, S. D.
Van Woerden, H. C.
Jenkinson, S. D.
description Summary A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01443610500280317
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01443610500280317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>954102741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnROO3oD3BjiAt3pVA8qkpnM5n4mGQSN7omt6mLzYSGFqgx_e-l7U4mapQFJPCdE849hDzn7DVnI3vDuJRCc6YY60cm-PCArLjQstPjJB6S1eG9a4A6I09KuWWMNVY-Jmdc91ooMa1IuI7zYqtPkSZHA6zTkim4im2nu4x3Pi2FWsACGSHSgr_gt_SSZqw5ld3h4g5pqcu8pz422exLzd5W-g0jZgh00zBfITwljxyEgs9O5zn5-uH9l6tP3c3nj9dXlzedFVLXbl5z148DmxCcVIJbNgxoJXMwrYG31fejsNY53s98RKGsmpRCJSXHSQkhzsmro-8up-8Llmq2vlgMASK2OEaPgxoG3Tfw5R_gbcsf299Mz9XQhip1g_gRsi1uyejMLvst5L3hzBx6MH_10DQvTsbLeovzveI0-AZcHAEfXcpb-JFymE2FfUjZZYjWFyP-5__uN_kGIdSNbR3dJ_i3-idqtqfm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215728046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Pathadey, S. D. ; Van Woerden, H. C. ; Jenkinson, S. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pathadey, S. D. ; Van Woerden, H. C. ; Jenkinson, S. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01443610500280317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16263539</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOGYDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Births ; Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, District ; Humans ; Incidence ; Labor, Induced - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Maternal Age ; Odds Ratio ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Probability ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Surgery ; United Kingdom ; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2005-10, Vol.25 (7), p.662-665</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16263539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pathadey, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Woerden, H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, S. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Summary A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, District</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Labor, Induced - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0144-3615</issn><issn>1364-6893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnROO3oD3BjiAt3pVA8qkpnM5n4mGQSN7omt6mLzYSGFqgx_e-l7U4mapQFJPCdE849hDzn7DVnI3vDuJRCc6YY60cm-PCArLjQstPjJB6S1eG9a4A6I09KuWWMNVY-Jmdc91ooMa1IuI7zYqtPkSZHA6zTkim4im2nu4x3Pi2FWsACGSHSgr_gt_SSZqw5ld3h4g5pqcu8pz422exLzd5W-g0jZgh00zBfITwljxyEgs9O5zn5-uH9l6tP3c3nj9dXlzedFVLXbl5z148DmxCcVIJbNgxoJXMwrYG31fejsNY53s98RKGsmpRCJSXHSQkhzsmro-8up-8Llmq2vlgMASK2OEaPgxoG3Tfw5R_gbcsf299Mz9XQhip1g_gRsi1uyejMLvst5L3hzBx6MH_10DQvTsbLeovzveI0-AZcHAEfXcpb-JFymE2FfUjZZYjWFyP-5__uN_kGIdSNbR3dJ_i3-idqtqfm</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Pathadey, S. D.</creator><creator>Van Woerden, H. C.</creator><creator>Jenkinson, S. D.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</title><author>Pathadey, S. D. ; Van Woerden, H. C. ; Jenkinson, S. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, District</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Labor, Induced - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pathadey, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Woerden, H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, S. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pathadey, S. D.</au><au>Van Woerden, H. C.</au><au>Jenkinson, S. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>662-665</pages><issn>0144-3615</issn><eissn>1364-6893</eissn><coden>JOGYDW</coden><abstract>Summary A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16263539</pmid><doi>10.1080/01443610500280317</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-3615
ispartof Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2005-10, Vol.25 (7), p.662-665
issn 0144-3615
1364-6893
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01443610500280317
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Births
Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics & numerical data
Cohort Studies
Confidence Intervals
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hospitals
Hospitals, District
Humans
Incidence
Labor, Induced - statistics & numerical data
Maternal Age
Odds Ratio
Parity
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Probability
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Studies
Surgery
United Kingdom
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics & numerical data
title Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A04%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20of%20labour%20after%20a%20previous%20caesarean%20section:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20in%20a%20district%20general%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Pathadey,%20S.%20D.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=662-665&rft.issn=0144-3615&rft.eissn=1364-6893&rft.coden=JOGYDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01443610500280317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E954102741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215728046&rft_id=info:pmid/16263539&rfr_iscdi=true