Loading…
Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital
Summary A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005-10, Vol.25 (7), p.662-665 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333 |
container_end_page | 665 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 662 |
container_title | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Pathadey, S. D. Van Woerden, H. C. Jenkinson, S. D. |
description | Summary
A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01443610500280317 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01443610500280317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>954102741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnROO3oD3BjiAt3pVA8qkpnM5n4mGQSN7omt6mLzYSGFqgx_e-l7U4mapQFJPCdE849hDzn7DVnI3vDuJRCc6YY60cm-PCArLjQstPjJB6S1eG9a4A6I09KuWWMNVY-Jmdc91ooMa1IuI7zYqtPkSZHA6zTkim4im2nu4x3Pi2FWsACGSHSgr_gt_SSZqw5ld3h4g5pqcu8pz422exLzd5W-g0jZgh00zBfITwljxyEgs9O5zn5-uH9l6tP3c3nj9dXlzedFVLXbl5z148DmxCcVIJbNgxoJXMwrYG31fejsNY53s98RKGsmpRCJSXHSQkhzsmro-8up-8Llmq2vlgMASK2OEaPgxoG3Tfw5R_gbcsf299Mz9XQhip1g_gRsi1uyejMLvst5L3hzBx6MH_10DQvTsbLeovzveI0-AZcHAEfXcpb-JFymE2FfUjZZYjWFyP-5__uN_kGIdSNbR3dJ_i3-idqtqfm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215728046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Pathadey, S. D. ; Van Woerden, H. C. ; Jenkinson, S. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pathadey, S. D. ; Van Woerden, H. C. ; Jenkinson, S. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01443610500280317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16263539</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOGYDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Births ; Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics & numerical data ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, District ; Humans ; Incidence ; Labor, Induced - statistics & numerical data ; Maternal Age ; Odds Ratio ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Probability ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Surgery ; United Kingdom ; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2005-10, Vol.25 (7), p.662-665</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16263539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pathadey, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Woerden, H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, S. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Summary
A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, District</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Labor, Induced - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0144-3615</issn><issn>1364-6893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnROO3oD3BjiAt3pVA8qkpnM5n4mGQSN7omt6mLzYSGFqgx_e-l7U4mapQFJPCdE849hDzn7DVnI3vDuJRCc6YY60cm-PCArLjQstPjJB6S1eG9a4A6I09KuWWMNVY-Jmdc91ooMa1IuI7zYqtPkSZHA6zTkim4im2nu4x3Pi2FWsACGSHSgr_gt_SSZqw5ld3h4g5pqcu8pz422exLzd5W-g0jZgh00zBfITwljxyEgs9O5zn5-uH9l6tP3c3nj9dXlzedFVLXbl5z148DmxCcVIJbNgxoJXMwrYG31fejsNY53s98RKGsmpRCJSXHSQkhzsmro-8up-8Llmq2vlgMASK2OEaPgxoG3Tfw5R_gbcsf299Mz9XQhip1g_gRsi1uyejMLvst5L3hzBx6MH_10DQvTsbLeovzveI0-AZcHAEfXcpb-JFymE2FfUjZZYjWFyP-5__uN_kGIdSNbR3dJ_i3-idqtqfm</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Pathadey, S. D.</creator><creator>Van Woerden, H. C.</creator><creator>Jenkinson, S. D.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</title><author>Pathadey, S. D. ; Van Woerden, H. C. ; Jenkinson, S. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, District</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Labor, Induced - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pathadey, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Woerden, H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, S. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pathadey, S. D.</au><au>Van Woerden, H. C.</au><au>Jenkinson, S. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>662-665</pages><issn>0144-3615</issn><eissn>1364-6893</eissn><coden>JOGYDW</coden><abstract>Summary
A retrospective study was undertaken in a district general hospital to identify factors associated with vaginal delivery, as opposed to caesarean section, in women undergoing induction of labour after a previous caesarean section. The study was undertaken over 9 years (April 1994 - May 2003) and included patients in their second or subsequent pregnancy who had previously had one lower segment caesarean delivery and in whom labour had been induced. Records were extracted from a database and anonymised. Vaginal delivery after induction of labour was attempted in 81 patients of whom 64 (79.0%) subsequently delivered vaginally. There were few complications and no cases of uterine rupture. Two factors had a statistical significant relationship with vaginal birth after induction of labour; occipito-anterior position (OR 10.18, 95% CI 1.42 - 112.7, Yates corrected χ2; p = 0.001) and more than one previous birth (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.28 - 21.67, p = 0.017). Other associations were explored but were not statistically significant. This paper contributes to the literature on factors associated with vaginal delivery after induction of labour and previous caesarean section, which may inform the selection of cases, and consequent success rates for vaginal delivery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16263539</pmid><doi>10.1080/01443610500280317</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-3615 |
ispartof | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2005-10, Vol.25 (7), p.662-665 |
issn | 0144-3615 1364-6893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_01443610500280317 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Adult Births Cesarean Section, Repeat - statistics & numerical data Cohort Studies Confidence Intervals Female Follow-Up Studies Hospitals Hospitals, District Humans Incidence Labor, Induced - statistics & numerical data Maternal Age Odds Ratio Parity Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Probability Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Studies Surgery United Kingdom Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - statistics & numerical data |
title | Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section: A retrospective study in a district general hospital |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A04%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20of%20labour%20after%20a%20previous%20caesarean%20section:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20in%20a%20district%20general%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Pathadey,%20S.%20D.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=662-665&rft.issn=0144-3615&rft.eissn=1364-6893&rft.coden=JOGYDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01443610500280317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E954102741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-db1f28709eaf4531c077ec40fa9ba11112283ccff12d18e35c5955e5441e95333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215728046&rft_id=info:pmid/16263539&rfr_iscdi=true |