Loading…
Assessment of the uncertainties of global climate models in the evaluation of standardized precipitation and runoff indices: a case study
Uncertainties in climate change projection can originate from various sources and cause challenges. Thus, two specific approaches were developed in this study, for use in the selection of global climate models and in the assessment of drought occurrence. Considering the bias-corrected data, the perf...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hydrological sciences journal 2021-07, Vol.66 (9), p.1419-1436 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913 |
container_end_page | 1436 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1419 |
container_title | Hydrological sciences journal |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Salimian, Niloofar Nazari, Sara Ahmadi, Azadeh |
description | Uncertainties in climate change projection can originate from various sources and cause challenges. Thus, two specific approaches were developed in this study, for use in the selection of global climate models and in the assessment of drought occurrence. Considering the bias-corrected data, the performance of global climate models was evaluated using statistical methods, and the 14 best-ranked models were selected. These climate scenarios were used in the Long Ashton Research Station (LARS) downscaling model to obtain the precipitation and temperature time series. Identification of unit Hydrographs And Component flows from Rainfall, Evaporation, and Streamflow (IHACRES) was used to model the runoff time series. Standardized precipitation and runoff indices were considered to assess the probability of meteorological and hydrological droughts. Finally, the Bayesian method was used to analyse the uncertainty assessment of drought occurrence. This methodology was applied in the Karkheh River basin and presented the moderate drought condition as the most probable state. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02626667.2021.1937178 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02626667_2021_1937178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2560969440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OHDEQhK0oSNksPEIkSznPxj8z9jinIAQhEhIXOFseu028mrU3tge0vAFvzQwL15xa6vqqWl0IfaNkQ0lPfhAmmBBCbhhhdEMVl1T2n9CK0Y40vOXdZ7RamGaBvqCvpWwJ4a0SfIVezkuBUnYQK04e17-Ap2ghVxNiDVCW5cOYBjNiO4adqYB3ycFYcIhvNDyacTI1pLigpZroTHbhGRzeZ7BhH-pRnQWcp5i8n60uWCg_scHWFJhdkzucohNvxgJn73ON7q8u7y6um5vb338uzm8ay3lfm95RSdVgB-YEGQTlSgxGtp2FruusU9K1Q2sleGq8cNIz1fdESgLA-qFXlK_R92PuPqd_E5Sqt2nKcT6pWSeIEqptyUx1R8rmVEoGr_d5fj8fNCV6aV1_tK6X1vV767Pv19EXok95Z55SHp2u5jCm7LOJNhTN_x_xCrJGi6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560969440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the uncertainties of global climate models in the evaluation of standardized precipitation and runoff indices: a case study</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Salimian, Niloofar ; Nazari, Sara ; Ahmadi, Azadeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Salimian, Niloofar ; Nazari, Sara ; Ahmadi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><description>Uncertainties in climate change projection can originate from various sources and cause challenges. Thus, two specific approaches were developed in this study, for use in the selection of global climate models and in the assessment of drought occurrence. Considering the bias-corrected data, the performance of global climate models was evaluated using statistical methods, and the 14 best-ranked models were selected. These climate scenarios were used in the Long Ashton Research Station (LARS) downscaling model to obtain the precipitation and temperature time series. Identification of unit Hydrographs And Component flows from Rainfall, Evaporation, and Streamflow (IHACRES) was used to model the runoff time series. Standardized precipitation and runoff indices were considered to assess the probability of meteorological and hydrological droughts. Finally, the Bayesian method was used to analyse the uncertainty assessment of drought occurrence. This methodology was applied in the Karkheh River basin and presented the moderate drought condition as the most probable state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0262-6667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-3435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2021.1937178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Atmospheric precipitations ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian method ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Drought ; Evaporation ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Hydrologic drought ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Precipitation ; Precipitation and runoff ; Probability theory ; Rain ; Rainfall ; River basins ; Runoff ; standardized precipitation index ; standardized runoff index ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Time series ; Uncertainty ; Unit hydrographs</subject><ispartof>Hydrological sciences journal, 2021-07, Vol.66 (9), p.1419-1436</ispartof><rights>2021 IAHS 2021</rights><rights>2021 IAHS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5248-0638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salimian, Niloofar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazari, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the uncertainties of global climate models in the evaluation of standardized precipitation and runoff indices: a case study</title><title>Hydrological sciences journal</title><description>Uncertainties in climate change projection can originate from various sources and cause challenges. Thus, two specific approaches were developed in this study, for use in the selection of global climate models and in the assessment of drought occurrence. Considering the bias-corrected data, the performance of global climate models was evaluated using statistical methods, and the 14 best-ranked models were selected. These climate scenarios were used in the Long Ashton Research Station (LARS) downscaling model to obtain the precipitation and temperature time series. Identification of unit Hydrographs And Component flows from Rainfall, Evaporation, and Streamflow (IHACRES) was used to model the runoff time series. Standardized precipitation and runoff indices were considered to assess the probability of meteorological and hydrological droughts. Finally, the Bayesian method was used to analyse the uncertainty assessment of drought occurrence. This methodology was applied in the Karkheh River basin and presented the moderate drought condition as the most probable state.</description><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian method</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Hydrologic drought</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation and runoff</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>standardized precipitation index</subject><subject>standardized runoff index</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Unit hydrographs</subject><issn>0262-6667</issn><issn>2150-3435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OHDEQhK0oSNksPEIkSznPxj8z9jinIAQhEhIXOFseu028mrU3tge0vAFvzQwL15xa6vqqWl0IfaNkQ0lPfhAmmBBCbhhhdEMVl1T2n9CK0Y40vOXdZ7RamGaBvqCvpWwJ4a0SfIVezkuBUnYQK04e17-Ap2ghVxNiDVCW5cOYBjNiO4adqYB3ycFYcIhvNDyacTI1pLigpZroTHbhGRzeZ7BhH-pRnQWcp5i8n60uWCg_scHWFJhdkzucohNvxgJn73ON7q8u7y6um5vb338uzm8ay3lfm95RSdVgB-YEGQTlSgxGtp2FruusU9K1Q2sleGq8cNIz1fdESgLA-qFXlK_R92PuPqd_E5Sqt2nKcT6pWSeIEqptyUx1R8rmVEoGr_d5fj8fNCV6aV1_tK6X1vV767Pv19EXok95Z55SHp2u5jCm7LOJNhTN_x_xCrJGi6s</recordid><startdate>20210704</startdate><enddate>20210704</enddate><creator>Salimian, Niloofar</creator><creator>Nazari, Sara</creator><creator>Ahmadi, Azadeh</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-0638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210704</creationdate><title>Assessment of the uncertainties of global climate models in the evaluation of standardized precipitation and runoff indices: a case study</title><author>Salimian, Niloofar ; Nazari, Sara ; Ahmadi, Azadeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian method</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Hydrologic drought</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation and runoff</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>standardized precipitation index</topic><topic>standardized runoff index</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Unit hydrographs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salimian, Niloofar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazari, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, Azadeh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salimian, Niloofar</au><au>Nazari, Sara</au><au>Ahmadi, Azadeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the uncertainties of global climate models in the evaluation of standardized precipitation and runoff indices: a case study</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle><date>2021-07-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1419</spage><epage>1436</epage><pages>1419-1436</pages><issn>0262-6667</issn><eissn>2150-3435</eissn><abstract>Uncertainties in climate change projection can originate from various sources and cause challenges. Thus, two specific approaches were developed in this study, for use in the selection of global climate models and in the assessment of drought occurrence. Considering the bias-corrected data, the performance of global climate models was evaluated using statistical methods, and the 14 best-ranked models were selected. These climate scenarios were used in the Long Ashton Research Station (LARS) downscaling model to obtain the precipitation and temperature time series. Identification of unit Hydrographs And Component flows from Rainfall, Evaporation, and Streamflow (IHACRES) was used to model the runoff time series. Standardized precipitation and runoff indices were considered to assess the probability of meteorological and hydrological droughts. Finally, the Bayesian method was used to analyse the uncertainty assessment of drought occurrence. This methodology was applied in the Karkheh River basin and presented the moderate drought condition as the most probable state.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02626667.2021.1937178</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-0638</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0262-6667 |
ispartof | Hydrological sciences journal, 2021-07, Vol.66 (9), p.1419-1436 |
issn | 0262-6667 2150-3435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02626667_2021_1937178 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Atmospheric precipitations Bayesian analysis Bayesian method Climate change Climate models Drought Evaporation Global climate Global climate models Hydrologic drought Hydrology Mathematical models Precipitation Precipitation and runoff Probability theory Rain Rainfall River basins Runoff standardized precipitation index standardized runoff index Statistical analysis Statistical methods Stream discharge Stream flow Time series Uncertainty Unit hydrographs |
title | Assessment of the uncertainties of global climate models in the evaluation of standardized precipitation and runoff indices: a case study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20uncertainties%20of%20global%20climate%20models%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20standardized%20precipitation%20and%20runoff%20indices:%20a%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20sciences%20journal&rft.au=Salimian,%20Niloofar&rft.date=2021-07-04&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1419&rft.epage=1436&rft.pages=1419-1436&rft.issn=0262-6667&rft.eissn=2150-3435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02626667.2021.1937178&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2560969440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8d1719bcb2d60b61396ba745ce555cd97d4b4c7ef1af6d7f29880770ee28b8913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560969440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |