Durability of running shoes with ethylene vinyl acetate or polyurethane midsoles

• Published in: Journal of sports sciences 2012-12, Vol.30 (16), p.1787-1792
• Main Authors: Wang, Lin, Hong, Youlian, Li, Jing Xian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Athletic shoes; Biological and medical sciences; Biomechanical Phenomena; biomechanics; cushioning; Density; Ethylene; Ethylenes; Foot; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hardness; Humans; Male; Materials durability; Polyurethane; Polyurethanes; road running; Running; Running shoe; Shoes - standards; Sports Equipment - standards; Stress, Mechanical; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports; Vinyl Compounds; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0264-0414; 1466-447X
• DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.723819

Ethylene vinyl acetate and polyurethane are widely used materials for shoe midsoles. The present study investigated the durability of running shoes made from ethylene vinyl acetate and one type of polyurethane (polyurethane-1), which have similar hardness and density, and another type of polyurethane (polyurethane-2), which has high hardness/density. All shoes differed from one another only in terms of the midsole material used. Eight male runners participated in the present study and used the shoes to run 500 km (10 × 50 km). The cushioning and energy return characteristics of each shoe were measured using an impact tester before and after each 50-km run. The results showed that as the running distance increased, the peak force of midsole materials changed with different patterns. Ethylene vinyl acetate and polyurethane-1 showed greater cushioning than polyurethane-2 over 500 km (ethylene vinyl acetate, 918.2-968.0 N; polyurethane-1, 909.6-972.9 N; polyurethane-2, 983.0-1105.6 N). Polyurethane-1 showed greater cushioning from 200 km to 300 km compared with 0 km (0 km, 972.9 ± 66.3 N; 200 km, 909.6 ± 61.2 N; 250 km, 921.9 ± 51.2 N; 300 km, 924.6 ± 51.9 N). The cushioning of ethylene vinyl acetate shoes was diminished after 500 km compared with that at 0 km (968.0 ± 25.9 N vs. 921.1 ± 20.1 N). Ethylene vinyl acetate resulted in greater energy returns than polyurethane. Both foam category and hardness/density affected the critical biomechanical properties of running shoes.