Loading…

Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration

The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sports sciences 2017-07, Vol.35 (13), p.1279-1286
Main Authors: Kim, Dohyun, Lee, Jongshill, Park, Hoon Ki, Jang, Dong Pyo, Song, Soohwa, Cho, Baek Hwan, Jung, Yoo-Suk, Park, Rae-Woong, Joo, Nam-Seok, Kim, In Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3
container_end_page 1286
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1279
container_title Journal of sports sciences
container_volume 35
creator Kim, Dohyun
Lee, Jongshill
Park, Hoon Ki
Jang, Dong Pyo
Song, Soohwa
Cho, Baek Hwan
Jung, Yoo-Suk
Park, Rae-Woong
Joo, Nam-Seok
Kim, In Young
description The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 and individually measured resting VO 2 as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 . Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02640414_2016_1221520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859719150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOfRwBZYsMmU9uxnWQHGkFBqtRNF-ysG8duXRI7tZ2WeQpeGUczZcGC1V2c7557dA9C7yjZUtKSS8IkJ5zyLSNUbiljVDDyCm0ol7LivPnxGm1WplqhE3Sa0gMhlFNB36IT1ggh21ps0O9dmGaIzt_hfG9wyuAHiEPCweLgDZ5Mhj6MTmPzuLgnGI3Pq5Yh_cTOY9B6iZDNuMcmZTdBXq3m-31yGsYiZ_fkchG9iXdl_JqNH1xeosE9JDOUI6uHGU1xccGfozcWxmQujvMM3X79crv7Vl3fXH3ffb6udN3xXLWDht52TAsNwHrKrWCCdqKxtqllb2TXWCF5R7huhpZbILwGZjrNpNYw1Gfo48F2juFxKcnV5FJJMYI3YUmKtqJraEcFKeiHf9CHsERfwhWq_JBIyVZKHCgdQ0rRWDXH8o24V5SotTD1UphaC1PHwsre-6P70k9m-Lv10lABPh0A522IEzyHOA4qw34M0Ubw2iVV___GH7BXp_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883506620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Kim, Dohyun ; Lee, Jongshill ; Park, Hoon Ki ; Jang, Dong Pyo ; Song, Soohwa ; Cho, Baek Hwan ; Jung, Yoo-Suk ; Park, Rae-Woong ; Joo, Nam-Seok ; Kim, In Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyun ; Lee, Jongshill ; Park, Hoon Ki ; Jang, Dong Pyo ; Song, Soohwa ; Cho, Baek Hwan ; Jung, Yoo-Suk ; Park, Rae-Woong ; Joo, Nam-Seok ; Kim, In Young</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 and individually measured resting VO 2 as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 . Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-0414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-447X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27556835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; accelerometer ; Accelerometry ; Adult ; Calorimetry, Indirect ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Metabolic Equivalent ; metabolic equivalent of task ; physical activity energy expenditure ; resting metabolic rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of sports sciences, 2017-07, Vol.35 (13), p.1279-1286</ispartof><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2016</rights><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jongshill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hoon Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Dong Pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Soohwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Baek Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Yoo-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Nam-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, In Young</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</title><title>Journal of sports sciences</title><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><description>The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 and individually measured resting VO 2 as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 . Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>accelerometer</subject><subject>Accelerometry</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Calorimetry, Indirect</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolic Equivalent</subject><subject>metabolic equivalent of task</subject><subject>physical activity energy expenditure</subject><subject>resting metabolic rate</subject><issn>0264-0414</issn><issn>1466-447X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOfRwBZYsMmU9uxnWQHGkFBqtRNF-ysG8duXRI7tZ2WeQpeGUczZcGC1V2c7557dA9C7yjZUtKSS8IkJ5zyLSNUbiljVDDyCm0ol7LivPnxGm1WplqhE3Sa0gMhlFNB36IT1ggh21ps0O9dmGaIzt_hfG9wyuAHiEPCweLgDZ5Mhj6MTmPzuLgnGI3Pq5Yh_cTOY9B6iZDNuMcmZTdBXq3m-31yGsYiZ_fkchG9iXdl_JqNH1xeosE9JDOUI6uHGU1xccGfozcWxmQujvMM3X79crv7Vl3fXH3ffb6udN3xXLWDht52TAsNwHrKrWCCdqKxtqllb2TXWCF5R7huhpZbILwGZjrNpNYw1Gfo48F2juFxKcnV5FJJMYI3YUmKtqJraEcFKeiHf9CHsERfwhWq_JBIyVZKHCgdQ0rRWDXH8o24V5SotTD1UphaC1PHwsre-6P70k9m-Lv10lABPh0A522IEzyHOA4qw34M0Ubw2iVV___GH7BXp_0</recordid><startdate>20170703</startdate><enddate>20170703</enddate><creator>Kim, Dohyun</creator><creator>Lee, Jongshill</creator><creator>Park, Hoon Ki</creator><creator>Jang, Dong Pyo</creator><creator>Song, Soohwa</creator><creator>Cho, Baek Hwan</creator><creator>Jung, Yoo-Suk</creator><creator>Park, Rae-Woong</creator><creator>Joo, Nam-Seok</creator><creator>Kim, In Young</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170703</creationdate><title>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</title><author>Kim, Dohyun ; Lee, Jongshill ; Park, Hoon Ki ; Jang, Dong Pyo ; Song, Soohwa ; Cho, Baek Hwan ; Jung, Yoo-Suk ; Park, Rae-Woong ; Joo, Nam-Seok ; Kim, In Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>accelerometer</topic><topic>Accelerometry</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Calorimetry, Indirect</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolic Equivalent</topic><topic>metabolic equivalent of task</topic><topic>physical activity energy expenditure</topic><topic>resting metabolic rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jongshill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hoon Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Dong Pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Soohwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Baek Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Yoo-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Nam-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, In Young</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dohyun</au><au>Lee, Jongshill</au><au>Park, Hoon Ki</au><au>Jang, Dong Pyo</au><au>Song, Soohwa</au><au>Cho, Baek Hwan</au><au>Jung, Yoo-Suk</au><au>Park, Rae-Woong</au><au>Joo, Nam-Seok</au><au>Kim, In Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><date>2017-07-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1279</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1279-1286</pages><issn>0264-0414</issn><eissn>1466-447X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 and individually measured resting VO 2 as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O 2  · kg −1  · min −1 . Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>27556835</pmid><doi>10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-0414
ispartof Journal of sports sciences, 2017-07, Vol.35 (13), p.1279-1286
issn 0264-0414
1466-447X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02640414_2016_1221520
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
subjects Acceleration
accelerometer
Accelerometry
Adult
Calorimetry, Indirect
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Exercise - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Metabolic Equivalent
metabolic equivalent of task
physical activity energy expenditure
resting metabolic rate
title Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A19%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20standards%20of%20one%20metabolic%20equivalent%20of%20task%20in%20accurately%20estimating%20physical%20activity%20energy%20expenditure%20based%20on%20acceleration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sports%20sciences&rft.au=Kim,%20Dohyun&rft.date=2017-07-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1279&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1279-1286&rft.issn=0264-0414&rft.eissn=1466-447X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859719150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883506620&rft_id=info:pmid/27556835&rfr_iscdi=true