Loading…
Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration
The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of sports sciences 2017-07, Vol.35 (13), p.1279-1286 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3 |
container_end_page | 1286 |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 1279 |
container_title | Journal of sports sciences |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Kim, Dohyun Lee, Jongshill Park, Hoon Ki Jang, Dong Pyo Song, Soohwa Cho, Baek Hwan Jung, Yoo-Suk Park, Rae-Woong Joo, Nam-Seok Kim, In Young |
description | The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
and individually measured resting VO
2
as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
. Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02640414_2016_1221520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859719150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOfRwBZYsMmU9uxnWQHGkFBqtRNF-ysG8duXRI7tZ2WeQpeGUczZcGC1V2c7557dA9C7yjZUtKSS8IkJ5zyLSNUbiljVDDyCm0ol7LivPnxGm1WplqhE3Sa0gMhlFNB36IT1ggh21ps0O9dmGaIzt_hfG9wyuAHiEPCweLgDZ5Mhj6MTmPzuLgnGI3Pq5Yh_cTOY9B6iZDNuMcmZTdBXq3m-31yGsYiZ_fkchG9iXdl_JqNH1xeosE9JDOUI6uHGU1xccGfozcWxmQujvMM3X79crv7Vl3fXH3ffb6udN3xXLWDht52TAsNwHrKrWCCdqKxtqllb2TXWCF5R7huhpZbILwGZjrNpNYw1Gfo48F2juFxKcnV5FJJMYI3YUmKtqJraEcFKeiHf9CHsERfwhWq_JBIyVZKHCgdQ0rRWDXH8o24V5SotTD1UphaC1PHwsre-6P70k9m-Lv10lABPh0A522IEzyHOA4qw34M0Ubw2iVV___GH7BXp_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883506620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Kim, Dohyun ; Lee, Jongshill ; Park, Hoon Ki ; Jang, Dong Pyo ; Song, Soohwa ; Cho, Baek Hwan ; Jung, Yoo-Suk ; Park, Rae-Woong ; Joo, Nam-Seok ; Kim, In Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyun ; Lee, Jongshill ; Park, Hoon Ki ; Jang, Dong Pyo ; Song, Soohwa ; Cho, Baek Hwan ; Jung, Yoo-Suk ; Park, Rae-Woong ; Joo, Nam-Seok ; Kim, In Young</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
and individually measured resting VO
2
as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
. Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-0414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-447X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27556835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; accelerometer ; Accelerometry ; Adult ; Calorimetry, Indirect ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Metabolic Equivalent ; metabolic equivalent of task ; physical activity energy expenditure ; resting metabolic rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of sports sciences, 2017-07, Vol.35 (13), p.1279-1286</ispartof><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016</rights><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jongshill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hoon Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Dong Pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Soohwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Baek Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Yoo-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Nam-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, In Young</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</title><title>Journal of sports sciences</title><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><description>The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
and individually measured resting VO
2
as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
. Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>accelerometer</subject><subject>Accelerometry</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Calorimetry, Indirect</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolic Equivalent</subject><subject>metabolic equivalent of task</subject><subject>physical activity energy expenditure</subject><subject>resting metabolic rate</subject><issn>0264-0414</issn><issn>1466-447X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOfRwBZYsMmU9uxnWQHGkFBqtRNF-ysG8duXRI7tZ2WeQpeGUczZcGC1V2c7557dA9C7yjZUtKSS8IkJ5zyLSNUbiljVDDyCm0ol7LivPnxGm1WplqhE3Sa0gMhlFNB36IT1ggh21ps0O9dmGaIzt_hfG9wyuAHiEPCweLgDZ5Mhj6MTmPzuLgnGI3Pq5Yh_cTOY9B6iZDNuMcmZTdBXq3m-31yGsYiZ_fkchG9iXdl_JqNH1xeosE9JDOUI6uHGU1xccGfozcWxmQujvMM3X79crv7Vl3fXH3ffb6udN3xXLWDht52TAsNwHrKrWCCdqKxtqllb2TXWCF5R7huhpZbILwGZjrNpNYw1Gfo48F2juFxKcnV5FJJMYI3YUmKtqJraEcFKeiHf9CHsERfwhWq_JBIyVZKHCgdQ0rRWDXH8o24V5SotTD1UphaC1PHwsre-6P70k9m-Lv10lABPh0A522IEzyHOA4qw34M0Ubw2iVV___GH7BXp_0</recordid><startdate>20170703</startdate><enddate>20170703</enddate><creator>Kim, Dohyun</creator><creator>Lee, Jongshill</creator><creator>Park, Hoon Ki</creator><creator>Jang, Dong Pyo</creator><creator>Song, Soohwa</creator><creator>Cho, Baek Hwan</creator><creator>Jung, Yoo-Suk</creator><creator>Park, Rae-Woong</creator><creator>Joo, Nam-Seok</creator><creator>Kim, In Young</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170703</creationdate><title>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</title><author>Kim, Dohyun ; Lee, Jongshill ; Park, Hoon Ki ; Jang, Dong Pyo ; Song, Soohwa ; Cho, Baek Hwan ; Jung, Yoo-Suk ; Park, Rae-Woong ; Joo, Nam-Seok ; Kim, In Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>accelerometer</topic><topic>Accelerometry</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Calorimetry, Indirect</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolic Equivalent</topic><topic>metabolic equivalent of task</topic><topic>physical activity energy expenditure</topic><topic>resting metabolic rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jongshill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hoon Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Dong Pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Soohwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Baek Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Yoo-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Nam-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, In Young</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dohyun</au><au>Lee, Jongshill</au><au>Park, Hoon Ki</au><au>Jang, Dong Pyo</au><au>Song, Soohwa</au><au>Cho, Baek Hwan</au><au>Jung, Yoo-Suk</au><au>Park, Rae-Woong</au><au>Joo, Nam-Seok</au><au>Kim, In Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><date>2017-07-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1279</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1279-1286</pages><issn>0264-0414</issn><eissn>1466-447X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the study is to analyse how the standard of resting metabolic rate (RMR) affects estimation of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) using an accelerometer. In order to investigate the effect on estimation according to intensity of activity, comparisons were conducted between the 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
and individually measured resting VO
2
as the standard of 1 MET. MET was estimated by linear regression equations that were derived through five-fold cross-validation using 2 types of MET values and accelerations; the accuracy of estimation was analysed through cross-validation, Bland and Altman plot, and one-way ANOVA test. There were no significant differences in the RMS error after cross-validation. However, the individual RMR-based estimations had as many as 0.5 METs of mean difference in modified Bland and Altman plots than RMR of 3.5 ml O
2
· kg
−1
· min
−1
. Finally, the results of an ANOVA test indicated that the individual RMR-based estimations had less significant differences between the reference and estimated values at each intensity of activity. In conclusion, the RMR standard is a factor that affects accurate estimation of METs by acceleration; therefore, RMR requires individual specification when it is used for estimation of METs using an accelerometer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>27556835</pmid><doi>10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-0414 |
ispartof | Journal of sports sciences, 2017-07, Vol.35 (13), p.1279-1286 |
issn | 0264-0414 1466-447X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02640414_2016_1221520 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) |
subjects | Acceleration accelerometer Accelerometry Adult Calorimetry, Indirect Energy Metabolism - physiology Exercise - physiology Female Humans Male Metabolic Equivalent metabolic equivalent of task physical activity energy expenditure resting metabolic rate |
title | Comparing the standards of one metabolic equivalent of task in accurately estimating physical activity energy expenditure based on acceleration |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A19%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20standards%20of%20one%20metabolic%20equivalent%20of%20task%20in%20accurately%20estimating%20physical%20activity%20energy%20expenditure%20based%20on%20acceleration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sports%20sciences&rft.au=Kim,%20Dohyun&rft.date=2017-07-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1279&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1279-1286&rft.issn=0264-0414&rft.eissn=1466-447X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02640414.2016.1221520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859719150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-8dcabf92c5caa2b14f5251957ff736be697f564904c7d84fa043a2e9c26ccad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883506620&rft_id=info:pmid/27556835&rfr_iscdi=true |