Loading…

Differences in applied electrical power between full thorax models and limited-domain models for RF cardiac ablation

Most modeling studies on radiofrequency cardiac ablation (RFCA) are based on limited-domain models, which means the computational domain is restricted to a few centimeters of myocardium and blood around the active electrode. When mimicking constant power RFCA procedures (e.g., atrial fibrillation ab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of hyperthermia 2020-01, Vol.37 (1), p.677-687
Main Authors: Irastorza, Ramiro M., Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana, Pérez, Juan J., Berjano, Enrique
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3
container_end_page 687
container_issue 1
container_start_page 677
container_title International journal of hyperthermia
container_volume 37
creator Irastorza, Ramiro M.
Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana
Pérez, Juan J.
Berjano, Enrique
description Most modeling studies on radiofrequency cardiac ablation (RFCA) are based on limited-domain models, which means the computational domain is restricted to a few centimeters of myocardium and blood around the active electrode. When mimicking constant power RFCA procedures (e.g., atrial fibrillation ablation) it is important to know how much power is absorbed around the active electrode and how much in the rest of the tissues before reaching the dispersive electrode. 3D thorax full models were built by progressively incorporating different organs and tissues with simplified geometries (cardiac chamber, cardiac wall, subcutaneous tissue and skin, spine, lungs and aorta). Other 2D limited-domain models were also built based on fragments of myocardium and blood. The electrical problem was solved for each model to estimate the spatial power distribution around the active electrode. From 79 to 82% of the power was absorbed in a 4 cm-radius sphere around the active electrode in the full thorax model at active electrode insertion depths of between 0.5 and 2.5 mm, while the impedance values ranged from 104 to 118 Ω, which were consistent with those found (from 83 to 103 Ω) in a 4 cm radius cylindrical limited domain model. The applied power in limited-domain RFCA models is approximately 80% of that applied in full thorax models, which is equivalent to the power programed in a clinical setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02656736.2020.1777330
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02656736_2020_1777330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ba7ac818bc08467089693835bd84d182</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2415286069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOI5-BCFHL70m6c6fvimrqwsLgug5VJKKZkl32qSHcb_99jijR08Fr977FdQj5DVnV5wZ9pYJJZXu1ZVgYpO01n3PnpAdH9TQSS71U7I7ebqT6Tl50do9Y2yQQu_I-iHFiBVnj42mmcKy5ISBYka_1uQh06UcsVKH6xFxpvGQM11_lgq_6VQC5kZhDjSnKa0YulAm2DCXTSyVfr2hHmpI4Cm4DGsq80vyLEJu-Ooy9-T7zcdv15-7uy-fbq_f33V-kGrtZNSBOce8R4GCo-65lJHzwcVRCKacNnrUwCX2kQ_YC6MFgIiMu6BG5vs9uT1zQ4F7u9Q0QX2wBZL9I5T6w0Jdk89oHWjwhhvnmRmUZmZUY2966YIZAjdiY705s5Zafh2wrXZKzWPOMGM5NCsGLoVRbIvtiTxbfS2tVYz_TnNmT43Zv43ZU2P20tiWe3fOpXl73ATHUnOwKzzkUmOF2adm-_8jHgHauZ0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415286069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in applied electrical power between full thorax models and limited-domain models for RF cardiac ablation</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Irastorza, Ramiro M. ; Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana ; Pérez, Juan J. ; Berjano, Enrique</creator><creatorcontrib>Irastorza, Ramiro M. ; Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana ; Pérez, Juan J. ; Berjano, Enrique</creatorcontrib><description>Most modeling studies on radiofrequency cardiac ablation (RFCA) are based on limited-domain models, which means the computational domain is restricted to a few centimeters of myocardium and blood around the active electrode. When mimicking constant power RFCA procedures (e.g., atrial fibrillation ablation) it is important to know how much power is absorbed around the active electrode and how much in the rest of the tissues before reaching the dispersive electrode. 3D thorax full models were built by progressively incorporating different organs and tissues with simplified geometries (cardiac chamber, cardiac wall, subcutaneous tissue and skin, spine, lungs and aorta). Other 2D limited-domain models were also built based on fragments of myocardium and blood. The electrical problem was solved for each model to estimate the spatial power distribution around the active electrode. From 79 to 82% of the power was absorbed in a 4 cm-radius sphere around the active electrode in the full thorax model at active electrode insertion depths of between 0.5 and 2.5 mm, while the impedance values ranged from 104 to 118 Ω, which were consistent with those found (from 83 to 103 Ω) in a 4 cm radius cylindrical limited domain model. The applied power in limited-domain RFCA models is approximately 80% of that applied in full thorax models, which is equivalent to the power programed in a clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1777330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Cardiac ablation ; computer model ; limited-domain model ; RF ablation ; thorax model</subject><ispartof>International journal of hyperthermia, 2020-01, Vol.37 (1), p.677-687</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1813-4176 ; 0000-0001-8486-8699 ; 0000-0002-3247-2665 ; 0000-0002-6455-3574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02656736.2020.1777330$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02656736.2020.1777330$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27481,27903,27904,59120,59121</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Irastorza, Ramiro M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berjano, Enrique</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in applied electrical power between full thorax models and limited-domain models for RF cardiac ablation</title><title>International journal of hyperthermia</title><description>Most modeling studies on radiofrequency cardiac ablation (RFCA) are based on limited-domain models, which means the computational domain is restricted to a few centimeters of myocardium and blood around the active electrode. When mimicking constant power RFCA procedures (e.g., atrial fibrillation ablation) it is important to know how much power is absorbed around the active electrode and how much in the rest of the tissues before reaching the dispersive electrode. 3D thorax full models were built by progressively incorporating different organs and tissues with simplified geometries (cardiac chamber, cardiac wall, subcutaneous tissue and skin, spine, lungs and aorta). Other 2D limited-domain models were also built based on fragments of myocardium and blood. The electrical problem was solved for each model to estimate the spatial power distribution around the active electrode. From 79 to 82% of the power was absorbed in a 4 cm-radius sphere around the active electrode in the full thorax model at active electrode insertion depths of between 0.5 and 2.5 mm, while the impedance values ranged from 104 to 118 Ω, which were consistent with those found (from 83 to 103 Ω) in a 4 cm radius cylindrical limited domain model. The applied power in limited-domain RFCA models is approximately 80% of that applied in full thorax models, which is equivalent to the power programed in a clinical setting.</description><subject>Cardiac ablation</subject><subject>computer model</subject><subject>limited-domain model</subject><subject>RF ablation</subject><subject>thorax model</subject><issn>0265-6736</issn><issn>1464-5157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOI5-BCFHL70m6c6fvimrqwsLgug5VJKKZkl32qSHcb_99jijR08Fr977FdQj5DVnV5wZ9pYJJZXu1ZVgYpO01n3PnpAdH9TQSS71U7I7ebqT6Tl50do9Y2yQQu_I-iHFiBVnj42mmcKy5ISBYka_1uQh06UcsVKH6xFxpvGQM11_lgq_6VQC5kZhDjSnKa0YulAm2DCXTSyVfr2hHmpI4Cm4DGsq80vyLEJu-Ooy9-T7zcdv15-7uy-fbq_f33V-kGrtZNSBOce8R4GCo-65lJHzwcVRCKacNnrUwCX2kQ_YC6MFgIiMu6BG5vs9uT1zQ4F7u9Q0QX2wBZL9I5T6w0Jdk89oHWjwhhvnmRmUZmZUY2966YIZAjdiY705s5Zafh2wrXZKzWPOMGM5NCsGLoVRbIvtiTxbfS2tVYz_TnNmT43Zv43ZU2P20tiWe3fOpXl73ATHUnOwKzzkUmOF2adm-_8jHgHauZ0Y</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Irastorza, Ramiro M.</creator><creator>Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana</creator><creator>Pérez, Juan J.</creator><creator>Berjano, Enrique</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-4176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8486-8699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-2665</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-3574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Differences in applied electrical power between full thorax models and limited-domain models for RF cardiac ablation</title><author>Irastorza, Ramiro M. ; Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana ; Pérez, Juan J. ; Berjano, Enrique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cardiac ablation</topic><topic>computer model</topic><topic>limited-domain model</topic><topic>RF ablation</topic><topic>thorax model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irastorza, Ramiro M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berjano, Enrique</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of hyperthermia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irastorza, Ramiro M.</au><au>Gonzalez-Suarez, Ana</au><au>Pérez, Juan J.</au><au>Berjano, Enrique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in applied electrical power between full thorax models and limited-domain models for RF cardiac ablation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of hyperthermia</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>687</epage><pages>677-687</pages><issn>0265-6736</issn><eissn>1464-5157</eissn><abstract>Most modeling studies on radiofrequency cardiac ablation (RFCA) are based on limited-domain models, which means the computational domain is restricted to a few centimeters of myocardium and blood around the active electrode. When mimicking constant power RFCA procedures (e.g., atrial fibrillation ablation) it is important to know how much power is absorbed around the active electrode and how much in the rest of the tissues before reaching the dispersive electrode. 3D thorax full models were built by progressively incorporating different organs and tissues with simplified geometries (cardiac chamber, cardiac wall, subcutaneous tissue and skin, spine, lungs and aorta). Other 2D limited-domain models were also built based on fragments of myocardium and blood. The electrical problem was solved for each model to estimate the spatial power distribution around the active electrode. From 79 to 82% of the power was absorbed in a 4 cm-radius sphere around the active electrode in the full thorax model at active electrode insertion depths of between 0.5 and 2.5 mm, while the impedance values ranged from 104 to 118 Ω, which were consistent with those found (from 83 to 103 Ω) in a 4 cm radius cylindrical limited domain model. The applied power in limited-domain RFCA models is approximately 80% of that applied in full thorax models, which is equivalent to the power programed in a clinical setting.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02656736.2020.1777330</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-4176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8486-8699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-2665</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-3574</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-6736
ispartof International journal of hyperthermia, 2020-01, Vol.37 (1), p.677-687
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_02656736_2020_1777330
source Taylor & Francis
subjects Cardiac ablation
computer model
limited-domain model
RF ablation
thorax model
title Differences in applied electrical power between full thorax models and limited-domain models for RF cardiac ablation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A36%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20applied%20electrical%20power%20between%20full%20thorax%20models%20and%20limited-domain%20models%20for%20RF%20cardiac%20ablation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20hyperthermia&rft.au=Irastorza,%20Ramiro%20M.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=687&rft.pages=677-687&rft.issn=0265-6736&rft.eissn=1464-5157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02656736.2020.1777330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415286069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5f7d0bb0cce2e21e73155f114bf92206b78797a15e3f14e32872aa2f01bd690c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415286069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true